Purpose. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Oncology module of the generic KINDL scale (having 24 items with 6 domains). Methods. The psychometric properties of the KINDL Oncology module were evaluated from the aspect of internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity on an inpatient sample of 103 Turkish children (mean age 10.0 ± 4.01 years) who had various oncological disorders. Results. The KINDL Oncology module (24 items) showed acceptable α coefficients ranging from .57 (physical well-being) to .87 (treatment) for each domain. In confirmatory factor analysis of the original 4-domain structure, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation was found as .086, and Comparative Fit Index was .87. Good known groups results supported the construct validity of the instrument. Correlations between the domains of the mother KINDL and the domains of its oncology module were significantly high, indicating a satisfactory convergent validity. Conclusion. The Turkish version of the KINDL Oncology module showed good reliability and questionable validity in this study. However, further research on other language versions of the module is needed for its global use.
BhatiaS.JenneyM. E. M.WuE.BogueM. K.RockwoodT. H.FeusnerJ. H.KaneR. L. (2004). The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument: Reliability and validity of the youth form. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 145, 39-46.
2.
BoyleM. H.OffordD. R.HofmannH. G. M.CatlinG. P.BylesJ. A.CadmanD. T.. . . SzatmariP. (1987). Ontario Child Health Study: I. Methodology. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 826-831.
3.
BullingerM.AlonsoJ.ApoloneG.LeplègeA.SullivanM.Wood-DauphineeS.. . . WareJ. E.Jr. (1998). Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: The IQOLA project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 913-923.
4.
ChenF.CurranP.BollenK. A.KirbyJ.PaxtonP. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Social Science Research, 36, 462-494.
5.
ChungO. K.LiH. C.ChiuS. Y.LopezV. (2012). Predisposing factors to the quality of life of childhood cancer survivors. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 29, 211-220.
6.
CollinsJ. J.DevineT. DDickG. S.JohnsonE. A.KilhamH. A.PinkertonC. R.. . . PortenoyR. K. (2002). The measurement of symptoms in young children with cancer: The validation of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale in children aged 7-12. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 23, 10-16.
7.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
8.
DupuisL. L.EthierM. C.TomlinsonD.HesserT.SungL. (2012). A systematic review of Symptom Assessment Scales in children with cancer. BMC Cancer, 12, 30.
9.
EiserC.MohayH.MorseR. (2000). The measurement of quality of life in young children. Child Care, Health and Development, 26, 401-414.
10.
EserE.YukselH.BaydurH.ErhartM.OzyurtB. C.OzcanC.SiebererU. R. (2008). The psychometric properties of the New Turkish Generic Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children (Kid-KINDL). Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 19, 409-417.
11.
EwingJ. E.KingM. T.SmithN. F. (2009).Validation of modified forms of the PedsQL Generic Core Scales and Cancer Module Scales for adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer or a blood disorder. Quality of Life, 8, 231-244.
12.
FurushoJ.KubagawaT.SatohH.ShibataR.NemotoY.MatsuzakiK.. . . WatanabeS. (2006). Study of the kid KINDL questionnaire scores for children with developmental disorders in normal classes and their parents. No To Hattatsu, 38, 183-186.
13.
GoodwinD. A. J.BoggsS. R.Graham-PoleJ. (1994). Development and validation of the pediatric oncology Quality of Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 6, 321-328.
14.
GundlachS.WurzJ.SchmutzerG.HiermannP.KapellenT.GallerA.. . . BrählerE. (2006). Health-related quality of life of siblings of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, 131, 1143-1148.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using Lisrel for structural equation modeling—A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.
17.
LangeveldN. E.GrootenhuisM. A.VouteP. A.HaanR. J.BosC. V. D. (2004). Quality of life, self-esteem and worries in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 13, 867-881.
18.
MacCallumR. C.AustinJ. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
19.
MacCallumR. C.BrowneM. W.SugawaraH. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.
20.
McGregorL. M.MetzgerM. L.SandersR.SantanaV. M. (2007). Pediatric cancers in the new millennium: Dramatic progress, new challenges. Oncology (Williston Park), 21, 809-820.
21.
McHorneyC. A.TarlovA. R. (1995). Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: Are available health status surveys adequate? Quality of Life Research, 4, 293-307.
22.
NoyesJ. (2007). Comparison of ventilator-dependent child reports of health-related quality of life with parent reports and normative populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 58, 1-10.
23.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McCrag-Hill.
24.
PortneyL. G.WatkinsM. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
25.
Ravens-SiebererU.ErhartM.WilleN.WetzelR.NickelJ.BullingerM. (2006). Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment in children and adolescents methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics, 24, 1199-1220.
26.
RobertR. S.PaxtonR. J.PallaS. L.YangG.AskinsM. A.JoyS. E.AterJ. L. (2012). Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Pediatric Quality Of Life Inventory generic core scales, cancer module and multidimensional fatigue scale in long-term adult survivors of pediatric cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 59, 703-707.
27.
RosenbaumP. L.SaigalS. (1996). Measuring health related quality of life in pediatric populations: Conceptual issues. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven.
28.
Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcome Trust. (2002). Assessing health status and health-related quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193-205.
29.
Serra-SuttonV.RajmilL.BerraS.HerdmanM.AymerichM.FerrerM.. . . SiméoniM. C. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the health and quality-of-life questionnaire, the Vecú et Santé Perçue de l’Adolescent (VSP-A). Atencion Primaria, 37, 203-208.
30.
ShepherdE. J. W.WoodgateR. L. (2010). Cancer survivorship in children and young adults: A concept analysis. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 27, 109-118.
31.
StreinerD. L.NormanG. R. (2003). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
32.
TanırK. M.KuğuoğluS. (2011). Turkish validity and reliability of a pediatric quality of life cancer module for children aged 8-12 and parents. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12, 125-130.
33.
TeixeiraI. P.Novais IdeP.Pinto RdeM.CheikN. C. (2012). Cultural adaptation and validation of the KINDL Questionnaire in Brazil for adolescents between 12 and 16 years of age. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 15, 845-857.
34.
VarniJ. W.KatzE. R.SeidM.QuigginD. J. L.FriedmanBenderA.CastroC. M. (1998). The Pediatric Cancer Quality of Life Inventory (PCQL): Instrument development’ descriptive statistics’ and cross-informant variance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 179-204.
35.
VarniJ. W.LimbersC. A. (2008). The PedsQL Multidimensional Fatigue Scale in young adults: Feasibility, reliability and validity in a university student population. Quality of Life Research, 17, 105-114.
36.
WeeH. L.Ravens-SiebererU.ErhartM.LiS.-C. (2007). Factor structure of the Singapore English version of the KINDL® children quality of life questionnaire. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19, 5-4.
