Abstract
Cell and gene therapies present unique challenges for long-term follow-up as they may lead to adverse events that could emerge years after treatment. Long-term follow-up helps identify potential delayed adverse events, such as oncogenesis or immunogenicity, which might not manifest immediately after treatment. Current regulatory guidelines emphasize a risk-based approach, recommending follow-up durations based on the therapy’s mechanism of action between 5 and 15 years. To facilitate long-term monitoring, regulatory authorities recommend the establishment of long-term follow-up protocols, often involving patient registries and supported by real-world data sources to systematically capture and track data from treated patients. These long-term follow-ups are instrumental in both post-approval safety studies and reimbursement decisions, where payers may link payments to treatment outcomes. As the field of cell and gene therapy evolves, regulatory frameworks continue to adapt, balancing the need for comprehensive long-term follow-up with the feasibility of implementation to ensure that therapies are adequately monitored, ensuring patient safety and therapeutic effectiveness over time. However, maintaining patient engagement over extended periods, ensuring high-quality data collection, and addressing privacy concerns present significant challenges. Innovative solutions such as decentralized data collection, digital health technologies, and data linkage with electronic health records aim to alleviate patient burden and improve data reliability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
