Abstract
Ten years ago, Orelove, Wehman, and Wood (1982) critically evaluated Special Olympics. Their review included the history and impact of Special Olympics, positive aspects of Special Olympics, limitations of Special Olympics, and suggestions for improving Special Olympics. Since this article was published, Special Olympics has made a variety of modifications and improvements to its overall organization and program. Yet, Special Olympics continues to be researched and critiqued. Has Special Olympics implemented any of the suggestions for improvement outlined by Orelove et al., or does Special Olympics continue to be the antithesis of the current philosophies of special education? The purpose of this paper is to objectively review the changes Special Olympics has made over the past ten years and evaluate Special Olympics in 1992. Emphasis is given to the efforts Special Olympics has made to meet the concerns raised by Orelove, Wehman, and Wood. New suggestions will be provided for improving Special Olympics or for initiating community alternatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
