Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide and is most frequently diagnosed in women who are between the ages of 35 and 44, with the incidence rates increasing nearly 2% each year in women ages 30–44. Standard surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer routinely involves hysterectomy. However, the prevalence of cervical cancer in young patients and the social shift of women electing to delay childbearing has created a reproductive dilemma. With the arrival of the radical vaginal trachelectomy in the late 1980s, patients with early-stage cervical cancer now had an option for fertility preservation. Over time, fertility-sparing surgeries for cervical cancer patients have become increasingly conservative while maintaining comparable oncologic outcomes. This surgical review examines the variety of fertility-sparing procedures available for early-stage cervical cancer in the context of their oncologic and reproductive outcomes.
FonthamETH, WolfAMD, ChurchTR, et al.Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020; 70(5):321–346; doi: 10.3322/CAAC.21628
2.
SchmelerKM, FrumovitzM, RamirezPT. Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: Is there a role for less radical surgery? Gynecol Oncol, 2011; 120(3):321–325; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.352
3.
GemerO, EitanR, GdalevichM, et al.Can parametrectomy be avoided in early cervical cancer? An algorithm for the identification of patients at low risk for parametrial involvement. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013; 39(1):76–80; doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.013
4.
FrumovitzM, SunCC, SchmelerKM, et al.Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol, 2009; 114(1):93–99; doi: 10.1097/AOG.0B013E3181AB474D
5.
WrightJD, GrigsbyPW, BrooksR, et al.Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer, 2007; 110(6):1281–1286; doi: 10.1002/CNCR.22899;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI
6.
CovensA, RosenB, MurphyJ, et al.How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the Cervix? Gynecol Oncol, 2002; 84(1):145–149; doi: 10.1006/GYNO.2001.6493
7.
SalaE, MiccoM, BurgerIA, et al.Complementary prognostic value of pelvic MRI and whole-body FDG PET/CT in the pretreatment assessment of patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2015; 25(8):1461–1467; doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000519
8.
KangS, NamBH, ParkJY, et al.Risk assessment tool for distant recurrence after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A Korean gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol, 2012; 30(19):2369–2374; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.5923;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
9.
ShimSH, LeeSW, ParkJY, et al.Risk assessment model for overall survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Gynecol Oncol, 2013; 128(1):54–59; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.09.033
10.
LakhmanY, AkinO, ParkKJ, et al.Stage IB1 cervical cancer: Role of preoperative MR imaging in selection of patients for fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy. Radiology, 2013; 269(1):149–158; doi: 10.1148/RADIOL.13121746
11.
XuL, SunFQ, WangZH. Radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer: A systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2011; 90(11):1200–1209; doi: 10.1111/J.1600-0412.2011.01231.X
12.
BentivegnaE, GouyS, MaulardA, et al.Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: A systematic review. Lancet Oncol, 2016; 17(6):e240–e253; doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30032-8
13.
WillowsK, LennoxG, CovensA. Fertility-sparing management in cervical cancer: Balancing oncologic outcomes with reproductive success. Gynecol Oncol Res Pract, 2016; 3(1):9; doi: 10.1186/S40661-016-0030-9
14.
TsengJH, AloisiA, SonodaY, et al.Long-Term oncologic outcomes of uterine-preserving surgery in young women with stage Ib1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2018; 28(7):1350–1359; doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001319
15.
PlanteM, GregoireJ, RenaudMC, RoyM. The vaginal radical trachelectomy: An update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol Oncol, 2011; 121(2):290–297; doi: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2010.12.345
16.
Gil-IbañezB, GlickmanA, Del PinoM, et al.Vaginal fertility-sparing surgery and laparoscopic sentinel lymph node detection in early cervical cancer. Retrospective study with 15 years of follow-up. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020; 251:23–27; doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.039
17.
WethingtonSL, CibulaD, DuskaLR, et al.An international series on abdominal radical trachelectomy. Intr J Gynecological Cancer, 2012; 22(7):1251–1257; doi: 10.1097/igc.0b013e318263eee2
18.
TangJ, LiJ, WangS, et al.On what scale does it benefit the patients if uterine arteries were preserved during ART? Gynecol Oncol, 2014; 134(1):154–159; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.04.043
19.
EinsteinMH, ParkKJ, SonodaY, et al.Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: A comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol, 2009; 112(1):73–77; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.09.007
20.
PhM, MaulardA, ScherierS, et al.Oncologic results of fertility sparing surgery of cervical cancer: An updated systematic review. Gynecol Oncol, 2022; 165(1):169–183; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.023
21.
NezhatC, RomanRA, RambhatlaA, NezhatF. Reproductive and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review. Fertil Steril, 2020; 113(4):685–703; doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.003
22.
MarchioleP, BenchaibM, BuenerdA, et al.Oncological safety of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical trachelectomy (LARVT or Dargent’s operation): A comparative study with laparoscopic-assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy (LARVH). Gynecol Oncol, 2007; 106(1):132–141; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.03.009
23.
RamirezPT, FrumovitzM, ParejaR, et al.Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med, 2018; 379(20):1895–1904; doi: 10.1056/NEJMOA1806395
24.
SalvoG, RamirezPT, LeitaoMM, et al.Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International radical trachelectomy assessment study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2022; 226(1):97.e1–97.e16; doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.029
25.
NickAM, FrumovitzMM, SolimanPT, et al.Fertility sparing surgery for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer: Open vs. robotic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 2012; 124(2):276–280; doi: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2011.09.035
26.
PerssonJ, ImbodenS, ReynissonP, et al.Reproducibility and accuracy of robot-assisted laparoscopic fertility sparing radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 2012; 127(3):484–488; doi: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2012.08.022
27.
RamirezPT, ParejaR, RendónGJ, et al.Management of low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: Should conization, simple trachelectomy, or simple hysterectomy replace radical surgery as the new standard of care? Gynecol Oncol, 2014; 132(1):254–259; doi: 10.1016/J.YGYNO.2013.09.004
28.
PlanteM, RenaudMC, SebastianelliA, GregoireJ. Simple vaginal trachelectomy: A valuable fertility-preserving option in early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2017; 27(5):1021–1027; doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000989
29.
PlanteM, RenaudMC, SebastianelliA, GregoireJ. Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: The new standard of care? Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020; 30(7):981–986; doi: 10.1136/IJGC-2020-001432
30.
ShimSH, LimMC, KimHJ, et al.Can simple trachelectomy or conization show comparable survival rate compared with radical trachelectomy in IA1 cervical cancer patients with lymphovascular space invasion who wish to save fertility? A systematic review and guideline recommendation. PLoS One, 2018; 13(1):e0189847; doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0189847
31.
SchmelerKM, ParejaR, BlancoAL, et al.ConCerv: A prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2021; 31(10):1317–1325; doi: 10.1136/IJGC-2021-002921
32.
FureyKB, AndersonZS, KuznickiML, et al.Increasing trends of cervical conization with lymph node evaluation for fertility-sparing surgery in early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2023; 173:122–129; doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.025
33.
Benedetti-PaniciP, ManeschiF, ScambiaG, et al.Lymphatic spread of cervical cancer: An anatomical and pathological study based on 225 radical hysterectomies with systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 1996; 62(1):19–24; doi: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0184
34.
JorgensenKA, AgustiN, WuCF, et al.Fertility-sparing surgery vs standard surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Difference in 5-year life expectancy by tumor size. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2024; 230(6):663.e1–663.e13; doi: 10.1016/J.AJOG.2024.02.012
