This study investigates how changes to an emergency voice communication system (EVCS) or the building environment affect speech intelligibility in four spaces of an office building: lobby, stairwell, dining area, and open-floor-plan office space. Effects of additional or alternate speaker locations, floor and wall coverings, and background noise on intelligibility are measured via objective means (i.e., meters that evaluated the speech transmission index (STI) of a test signal broadcast via the EVCS). Current practice recommends measurement spacing that appears to appropriately characterize the single-floor spaces, although changes to the environment can reduce STI measurements by nearly 20%. Several suggestions address concerns of when and where to perform speech intelligibility testing.
Jacob, K., ``Understanding Speech Intelligibility and the Fire Alarm Code,'' NFPA World Safety Congress, Anaheim, CA, 2001.
2.
International Electrotechnical Commission, `` Sound Systems for Emergency Purposes,'' IEC 60849 , Second Edition, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998, p. 43.
3.
International Organization for Standardization, `` Ergonomics — Assessment of Speech Communication,'' ISO 9921, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003, p. 36.
4.
National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 72: National Fire Alarm Code, 2002 Edition, Quincy, MA, USA, 2002, p. 235.
5.
Hodgson, M. and Nosal, E.-M., ``Effect of Noise and Occupancy on Optimal Reverberation Times For Speech Intelligibility In Classrooms,'' J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , Vol. 111, No. 2, 2002, pp. 931—939.
6.
Hodgson, M., ``Experimental Investigation of the Acoustical Characteristics of University Classrooms,'' J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 106, No. 4, 1999, pp. 1810—1819.
7.
Nishihara, N. and Hidaka, T., ``Mechanism Of Sound Absorption By Seated Audience In Halls,'' J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 110, No. 5, 2001, pp. 2398—2411.
8.
Geoffroy, N., ``Measuring Speech Intelligibility in Voice Alarm Communication Systems ,'' M.S. Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2005, p. 203.
9.
Accredited Standards Committee S3 (Bioacoustics), ``Method for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech Over Communications Systems,'' ANSI S3.2, Acoustical Society of America, 1995, p. 31.
10.
International Organization for Standardization, `` Acoustics — The Construction and Calibration of Speech Intelligibility Tests,'' ISO TR 4870, Switzerland, 1991, p. 26.
11.
International Electrotechnical Commission, `` Sound System Equipment — Part 16: Objective Rating Of Speech Intelligibility By Speech Transmission Index,'' IEC-60268-16, Third Edition, 2003, p. 34.
12.
SimplexGrinnell, ``STI-CIS System User's Guide,'' 579-277 Rev. A, Westminster, MA , USA, 2002, pp. 28.
Jacob, K., McManus, S., Verhave, J.A. and Steeneken, H., ``Development of an Accurate, Handheld, Simple-to-use Meter for the Prediction of Speech Intelligibility,'' Past, Present, and Future of the Speech Transmission Index, International Symposium on STI, The Netherlands, October 22—24, 2002, pp. 89—96.
15.
Steeneken, H. and Houtgast, T., ``Basics of the STI Measuring Method,'' Past, Present, and Future of the Speech Transmission Index, InternationalSymposium on STI, The Netherlands, October 22—24, 2002, pp. 13—44.
16.
Abrams, D., Duranceau, J., Geoffroy, N., Murphy, J., Newman, A. and Papagni, B., FP555 Detection, Alarm, and Smoke Control Final Project Report: Lobby, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2003, p. 30.
17.
Kahan, J., Liang, B.-W., Peralta, F., Phelan, P., Sulewski, A. and Thompson, B., FP555 Detection, Alarm, and Smoke Control Final Project Report: Stairwell , Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2003 , p. 15.
18.
Batbouta, M., Birmingham, J., Bou, F., C., Flaherty, D., Gratkowski, M. and Szwarc, D., FP555 Detection, Alarm, and Smoke Control Final Project Report: Cafeteria, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 2003, p. 38.
19.
Blackburn, M. , Choi, Y., Contois, D., Shanahan, G., Sher, E. and Woods, L., FP555 Detection, Alarm, and Smoke Control Final Project Report: Office, Worcester Polytechnic Institute , 2003, p. 35.
