Entrepreneurship scholarship faces challenges related to diverse populations, striving to balance inclusivity with the recognition of unique entrepreneurial identities. Applying optimal distinctiveness theory, we explore the relationship between belongingness and uniqueness in entrepreneurship research. Catalyzed by Bakker and McMullen’s 2023 article on inclusivity in entrepreneurship, we utilized natural language processing to examine responses about inclusive entrepreneurship from 29 scholars dedicated to marginalized populations. Findings suggest that employing varied research methods and integrating structural and epistemological considerations can enhance our understanding of entrepreneurial heterogeneity. We advocate for entrepreneurship research that values individual experiences while promoting inclusive practices, highlighting the need for evolving scholarly paradigms to reflect entrepreneurial differences.
Al-DajaniH.BangN.BascoR.CalabròA.ChengJ.ClintonE.DaspitJ.De MassisA.Discua CruzA.Garcia-LorenzoL.GartnerW.GermainO.GherardiS.HelinJ.ImasJ.JackS.McadamM.Radu-LefebvreM.RovelliP.WelterF. (2023). A multi-voiced account of family entrepreneuring research: Expanding the agenda of family entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(9), 2185–2233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2023-0516
4.
AldrichH. E.CliffJ. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00011-9
5.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
AudretschD. B.BelitskiM.CaiazzaR.GüntherC.MenterM. (2022). From latent to emergent entrepreneurship: The importance of context. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, Article 121356.
8.
AudretschD. B.LehmannE. E.SeitzN. (2021). Amenities, subcultures, and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 56, 571–591.
9.
BacqS.HartogC.HoogendoornB. (2013). A quantitative comparison of social and commercial entrepreneurship: Toward a more nuanced understanding of social entrepreneurship organizations in context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 40–68.
BakkerR. M.McMullenJ. S. (2023). Inclusive entrepreneurship: A call for a shared theoretical conversation about unconventional entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 38(1), Article 106268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106268
12.
BatesT. (2011). Minority entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 7(3–4), 151–311.
13.
BatesT. (2022), Minority entrepreneurship 2.0. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 18(7–8), 423–582. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000101
14.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215
15.
Ben-HafaïedhC.XhenetiM.StenholmP.BlackburnR.WelterF.UrbanoD. (2024). The interplay of context and entrepreneurship: The new frontier for contextualisation research. Small Business Economics, 62(2), 571–582.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.
18.
BrushC. G.de BruinA.WelterF. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910942318
19.
BrushC. G.DuhaimeI. M.GartnerW. B.StewartA.KatzJ. A.HittM. A.AlvarezS. A.MeyerG. D.VenkataramanS. (2003). Doctoral education in the field of entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 309–331.
20.
BrushC. G.GreeneP. G.HartM. M.HallerH. S. (2001). From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 15(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2001.4251394
21.
BrutonG. D.LewisA.Cerecedo-LopezJ. A.ChapmanK. (2023). A racialized view of entrepreneurship: A review and proposal for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 17(2), 492–515. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0185
22.
BruyatC.JulienP.-A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180.
23.
BusenitzL. W.BarneyJ. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.
24.
CalásM. B.SmircichL.BourneK. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.
25.
CarlandJ. W.HoyF.BoultonW. R.CarlandJ. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354–359.
26.
ChowdhuryR. (2023). Misrepresentation of marginalized groups: A critique of epistemic neocolonialism. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(3), 553–570.
27.
ClarkD. R.CrawfordG. C.PidduckR. J. (2023). Exceptionality in entrepreneurship: Systematically investigating outlier outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 20, Article e00422.
CrenshawK. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In CrenshawK. W.FinemanM. A.MykitiukR. (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 91–118). Routledge.
DansonM.GallowayL.SherifM. (2021). From unemployment to self-employment: Can enterprise policy intensify the risks of poverty?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 75, Article 102164.
32.
de BruinA.SwailJ. (2024). Advancing gender inclusivity: Moving entrepreneurial ecosystems onto new paths. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 19–36.
DilliS.ElertN.HerrmannA. M. (2018). Varieties of entrepreneurship: Exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments. Small Business Economics, 51, 293–320.
35.
DiltheyW. (1974). On the special character of the human sciences. In TruzziM. (Ed.), Verstehen: Subjective understanding in the social sciences (pp. 10–17). Addison-Wesley.
36.
EaglyA. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Psychology Press.
37.
EdwardsP.RamM. (2006). Surviving on the margins of the economy: Working relationships in small, low-wage firms. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 895–916.
38.
EliaG.MargheritaA.PassianteG. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, Article 119791.
39.
EssersC.BenschopY. (2007). Enterprising identities: Female entrepreneurs of Moroccan or Turkish origin in the Netherlands. Organization Studies, 28(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068256
40.
EssersC.BenschopY. (2009). Muslim businesswomen doing boundary work: The negotiation of Islam, gender and ethnicity within entrepreneurial contexts. Human Relations, 62(3), 403–423.
41.
FairlieR. W.FossenF. M. (2020). Defining opportunity versus necessity entrepreneurship: Two components of business creation. In PolachekS. W.TatsiramosK. (Eds.), Change at home, in the labor market, and on the job (pp. 253–289). Emerald Publishing Limited.
42.
FauchartE.GruberM. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935–957.
43.
FisherG.KothaS.LahiriA. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383–409. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0496
44.
FoucaultM. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason (HowardR., Trans.). Random House.
45.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
46.
GallowayL. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the gay minority: Why the silence?International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007782433196
47.
GallowayL. (2011). The experiences of male gay business owners in the UK. International Small Business Journal, 30(8), 890–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610391324
48.
GarciaR.BaackD. W. (2023). The invisible racialized minority entrepreneur: Using white solipsism to explain the white space. Journal of Business Ethics, 188(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05308-6
49.
GarciaR.BonillasE.BurtonK. (2023). Re-conceptualizing underrepresented racial minority entrepreneurs. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 19(5–6), 447–589. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000111
50.
Garcia-LorenzoL.DonnellyP.Sell-TrujilloL.ImasJ. M. (2018). Liminal entrepreneuring: The creative practices of nascent necessity entrepreneurs. Organization Studies, 39(2–3), 373–395.
51.
GartnerW. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
52.
GartnerW. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship?Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15–28.
53.
GartnerW. B.MitchellT. R.VesperK. H. (1989). A taxonomy of new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(3), 169–186.
IrankundaA.PriceG. N.UzamereN. E.WilliamsM. J. (2020). Ex-incarceree/convict status: Beneficial for self-employment and entrepreneurship?The American Economist, 65(1), 144–162.
59.
JacobidesM. G.CennamoC.GawerA. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
60.
KerrS.KerrW. (2020). Immigrant entrepreneurship in America: Evidence from the survey of business owners 2007 & 2012. Research Policy, 49, Article 103918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103918
KutelaB.MsechuK.NovatN.KidandoE.KitaliA. (2023). Uncovering the influence of ChatGPT’s prompts on scientific writings using machine learning-based text mining approaches (SSRN Scholarly Paper 4385895). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4385895
LandströmH.LohrkeF. (2010). Historical foundations of entrepreneurship research. Edward Elgar Publishing.
66.
LassalleP.ShawE. (2021). Trailing wives and constrained agency among women migrant entrepreneurs: An intersectional perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1496–1521.
67.
LiuC. Y.PainterG.WangQ. (2014). Lessons for U.S. metropolitan areas: Characteristics and clustering of high-tech immigrant entrepreneurs [White paper]. Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation.
MarlowS.Martinez DyA. (2018). Annual review article: Is it time to rethink the gender agenda in entrepreneurship research?International Small Business Journal, 36(1), 3–22.
70.
Martinez DyA. (2020). Not all entrepreneurship is created equal: Theorising entrepreneurial disadvantage through social positionality. European Management Review, 17(3), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12390
71.
Martinez DyA. M.MacNeilH. (2023). “Doing inequality, doing intersectionality”: Intersectionality as threshold concept for studying inequalities in entrepreneurial activity. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 31(1), 136–154.
72.
Martinez DyA.MarlowS.MartinL. (2017). A web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations, 70(3), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716650730
73.
Martinez DyA.MartinL.MarlowS. (2018). Emancipation through digital entrepreneurship? A critical realist analysis. Organization, 25(5), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418777891
74.
MaukschS.DeyP. (2024). Treating disability as an asset (not a limitation): A critical examination of disability inclusion through social entrepreneurship. Organization, 31(4), 624–644.
75.
McMullenJ. S.BrownellK. M.AdamsJ. (2021). What makes an entrepreneurship study entrepreneurial? Toward a unified theory of entrepreneurial agency. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 1197–1238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720922460
76.
MesserschmidtJ. W. (2018). Hegemonic masculinity: Formulation, reformulation, and amplification. Rowman & Littlefield.
77.
MinerJ. B.RajuN. S. (2004). Risk propensity differences between managers and entrepreneurs and between low-and high-growth entrepreneurs: A reply in a more conservative vein. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 3–13.
78.
MmbagaN. A.MathiasB. D.WilliamsD. W.CardonM. S. (2020). A review of and future agenda for research on identity in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), Article 106049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106049
79.
MorrisA. (2017). Voices from the margins: Inequalities in the sociological house. Social Problems, 64(2), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spx005
80.
MorrisM. H.PryorC. G.SchindehutteM. (2012). Entrepreneurship as experience: How events create ventures and ventures create entrepreneurs. Edward Elgar Publishing.
81.
NavisC.GlynnM. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. The Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2011.61031809
82.
NevoS. (2025). Atypical entrepreneurs in the venture idea elaboration phase. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(2), Article 106466.
83.
OECD/European Commission. (2023). The missing entrepreneurs 2023: Policies for inclusive entrepreneurship and self-employment. OECD Publishing.
84.
OgborJ. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196
PilkováA.JančovičováZ.KovačičováZ. (2016). Inclusive entrepreneurship in Visegrad4 countries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 220, 312–320.
88.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.
89.
Radu-LefebvreM.LefebvreV.CrosinaE.HyttiU. (2021). Entrepreneurial identity: A review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(6), 1550–1590. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211013795
90.
RamoglouS. (2013). Who is a ‘non-entrepreneur’? Taking the ‘others’ of entrepreneurship seriously. International Small Business Journal, 31(4), 432–453.
91.
RamoglouS.GartnerW. B.TsangE. W. K. (2020). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is (still) the wrong question. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, Article e00168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00168
92.
RobinsonG.DechantK. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Perspectives, 11(3), 21–31.
93.
SaxenianA. (2007). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Harvard University Press.
94.
SalmonyF. U.KanbachD. K. (2022). Personality trait differences across types of entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 16(3), 713–749.
95.
SchildtH. A.ZahraS. A.SillanpääA. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A co–citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00126.x
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
98.
ShoreL. M.RandelA. E.ChungB. G.DeanM. A.Holcombe EhrhartK.SinghG. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.
99.
SpigelB. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
100.
SpillingO. R. (2008). Entrepreneurship and heterogeneity. In CarayannisE. G.KaloudisA.MariussenA. (Eds.), Diversity in the knowledge economy and society. Heterogeneity, Innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 140–164). Edward Elgar Publishing.
StetsJ. E.BurkeP. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
104.
StewartW. H.Jr.RothP. L. (2001). Risk propensity differences between entrepreneurs and managers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 145.
105.
TeixeiraA. A. C. (2011). Mapping the (in)visible college(s) in the field of entrepreneurship. Scientometrics, 89(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0445-3
106.
ThaiM. T. T.TurkinaE. (2014). Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 490–510.
107.
TolbertP. S.DavidR. J.SineW. D. (2011). Studying choice and change: The intersection of institutional theory and entrepreneurship research. Organization Science, 22(5), 1332–1344. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0601
108.
ValdezZ. (2012). Self-employment as an indicator of segmented assimilation among six ethnic minority groups. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/2157-5665.1063,
WadhwaniR. D.LubinskiC. (2025). Hype: Marker and maker of entrepreneurial culture. Journal of Business Venturing, 40(2), Article 106455.
111.
WangQ.LiuC. Y. (2015). Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9595-z
112.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
113.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.
114.
WelterF.BakerT.AudretschD. B.GartnerW. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.
WheadonM.Duval-CouetilN. (2017). Entrepreneuring gender diversity in entrepreneurship through critical theory and reflexivity. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 188–202.
WingfieldA. H.TaylorT. (2018). Race, gender, and class in entrepreneurship: intersectional counterframes and black business owners. In ValdezZ.RomeroM. (Eds.), Intersectionality and ethnic entrepreneurship (pp. 124–144). Routledge.
119.
WooC. Y.CooperA. C.DunkelbergW. C. (1991). The development and interpretation of entrepreneurial typologies. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(2), 93–114.
120.
WuT.HeS.LiuJ.SunS.LiuK.HanQ.-L.TangY. (2023). A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 10(5), 1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618
121.
WuX.XiaoL.SunY.ZhangJ.MaT.HeL. (2022). A survey of human-in-the-loop for machine learning. Future Generation Computer Systems, 135, 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2022.05.014
122.
XhenetiM.MaddenA.Thapa KarkiS. (2019). Value of formalization for women entrepreneurs in developing contexts: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12172
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
