We incorporate entrepreneurial passion into a dual theory of information-processing, theorizing that passion can be used as information in analytical thinking, and as a heuristic in intuitive thinking. We find that passion is generally associated with an increase in crowdfunding success rates (+1%). Its effect becomes more powerful (+16% increase in success) when exhibited in conditions of coherence/fluency, that is, with high levels of preparedness, while it disappears in conditions of incoherence/disfluency and when the judgment is important. This conceptual framework reconciles contradictory findings of previous studies, suggesting that affective cues have the power to influence decisions in contexts characterized by large numbers of non-professional investors.
AllisonT. H.DavisB. C.WebbJ. W.ShortJ. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002
2.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.569
3.
AshkanasyN. M.HumphreyR. H.HuyQ. N (2017). Integrating emotions and affect in theories of management. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0474
BaronR. A.MarkmanG. D. (2000). Beyond social capital: How social skills can enhance entrepreneurs’ success. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909843
ButticèV.Di PietroFrancescaTencaF. (2021). They do not look alike: What kind of private investors do equity crowdfunded firms attract?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–30. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09895-w
8.
ButticèV.Di PietroF.TencaF. (2020). Is equity crowdfunding always good? Deal structure and the attraction of venture capital investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101773.
9.
ButticèV.FranzoniC.Rossi-LamastraC.RovelliP. (2018). The road to crowdfunding success: A review of extantliterature. In TucciC.AfuahA.ViscusiG. (Eds.), Creating and capturing value through crowdsourcing (pp. 97–126). Oxford University PressOxford University Press.
10.
CacioppoJ. T.CacioppoS.PettyR. E. (2018). The neuroscience of persuasion: A review with an emphasis on issues and opportunities. Social Neuroscience, 13(2), 129–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1273851
11.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.Kao ChuanF.RodriguezR. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1032–1043.
12.
CardonM. S. (2008). Is passion contagious? The transference of entrepreneurial passion to employees. Human Resource Management Review, 18(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.04.001
13.
CardonM. S.GregoireD. A.StevensC. E.PatelP. C. (2013). Measuring entrepreneurial passion: Conceptual foundations and scale validation. Journal of business venturing, 28(3), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.003.
14.
CardonM. S.KirkC. (2015). Entrepreneurial passion as mediator of the self-efficacy to persistence relationship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12089
15.
CardonM. S.MittenessC.SudekR. (2017). Motivational cues and angel investing: interactions among enthusiasm, preparedness, and commitment. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1057–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12255
16.
CardonM. S.SudekR.MittenessC. (2009a). The impact of perceived entrepreneurial passion on angel investing. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44244277
17.
CardonM.WincentJ.SinghJ.DrnovsekM. (2009b). The nature and expereince of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2009.40633190
18.
ChanC. S. R.ParhankangasA. (2017). Crowdfunding innovative ideas: How incremental and radical innovativeness influence funding outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12268
19.
ChenS.ChaikenS. (1999). The heuristic-systemic model in its broader context. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). The Guilford Press.
20.
ChenX. P.YaoX.KothaS. (2009). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36462018
21.
CohenJ. D. (2005). The vulcanization of the human brain: A neural perspective on interactions between cognition and emotion. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196750
22.
ColomboM. G.FranzoniC.Rossi-LamastraC. (2014). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100.
23.
ColomboM. G.FranzoniC.Rossi-LamastraC. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12118
24.
DamasioA. R (1994). Descartes’ error. Emotion, reason, and the human brain (Vol. 310). Avon Books.
25.
DaneE.PrattM. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Source: The Academy of Management Review Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
26.
DavisB.y C.HmieleskiK. M.WebbJ. W.CoombsJ. E. (2017). Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: The influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006
27.
de MolE.CardonM. S.de JongB.KhapovaS. N.ElfringT. (2020). Entrepreneurial passion diversity in new venture teams: An empirical examination of short-and long-term performance implications. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105965
28.
DefazioD.FranzoniC.Rossi-LamastraC. (2021). How pro-social framing affects the success of crowdfunding projects: The role of emphasis and information crowdedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 357–378.
29.
DehaeneS. (1997). The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford University Press.
30.
DrnovsekM.CardonM. S.PatelP. C. (2016). Direct and indirect effects of passion on growing technology ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(2), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1213.
31.
DroverW.WoodM. S.CorbettA. C. (2018). Toward a cognitive view of signalling theory: Individual attention and signal set interpretation. Journal of Management Studies, 55(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12282
EvansJ. (2007). Hypothetical thinking: Dual processes in reasoning and judgment. Psychology Press.
34.
EvansJ.FrankishK. (2009). In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press.
35.
EvansJ. S. B. T.StanovichK. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
GalbraithC. S.DenobleA. F.EhrlichS. B.HorowitzA. N. (2013). Presenter passion and presentation design on reviewer assessment and subsequent success: An empirical study of high technology proposal and business plan presentations. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 24(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2013.02.003
38.
GreifenederR.MullerP.StahlbergD.Van den BosK.BlessH. (2011). Guiding trustful behavior: The role of accessible content and accessibility experiences. The Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(5), 498-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.705.
39.
HinrichsJ. V.YurkoD. S.HuJ-M. (1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. Journal OfExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(4), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.4.890
40.
HoV. T.PollackJ. M. (2014). Passion isn’t always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs’ network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12062
41.
HseeC. K.KunreutherH. C. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007876907268.
42.
HsuD. K.Michael HaynieJ.SimmonsS. A.McKelvieA. (2014). What matters, matters differently: A conjoint analysis of the decision policies of angel and venture capital investors. Venture Capital, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.825527
43.
JaniszewskiC.LichtensteinD. R. (1999). A range theory account of price perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1086/209544
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
46.
KahnemanD.KleinG. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755
47.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.411
48.
KruglanskiA. W.ThompsonE. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pl100201
49.
Laureiro-MartínezD.BrusoniS. (2018). Cognitive flexibility and adaptive decision-making: Evidence from a laboratory study of expert decision makers. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1031–1058.
LiJ. J.ChenX. P.KothaS.FisherG. (2017). Catching fire and spreading it: A glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000217
LordR. G.MaherK. J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research, and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308219
55.
LoughranT.McDonaldB. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10‐Ks. The Journal of finance, 66(1), 35-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x.
56.
McKennyA. F.AguinisH.ShortJ. C.AnglinA. H. (2018). What doesn’t get measured does exist: Improving the accuracy of computer-aided text analysis. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2909–2933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316657594
57.
MittenessC.SudekR.CardonM. S. (2012). Angel investor characteristics that determine whether perceived passion leads to higher evaluations of funding potential. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(5), 592–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.003
MonroeK. B. (2003). Pricing: Making profitable decisions. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
60.
MurnieksC. Y.CardonM. S.SudekR.WhiteT. D.BrooksW. T. (2016). Drawn to the fire: The role of passion, tenacity and inspirational leadership in Angel investing. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.002
61.
NadkarniS.GruberM.DeCellesK.ConnellyB.BaerM. (2018). New ways of seeing: Radical theorizing. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.4002
62.
OoP. P.AllisonT. H.SahaymA.JuasrikulS. (2019). User entrepreneurs’ multiple identities and crowdfunding performance: Effects through product innovativeness, perceived passion, and need similarity. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.08.005
63.
ParhankangasA.EhrlichM. (2014). How entrepreneurs seduce business angels: An impression management approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.08.001
64.
ParhankangasA.RenkoM. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001
65.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2.
66.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1086/208954.
67.
PollackJ. M.RutherfordM. W.NagyB. G. (2012). Preparedness and cognitive legitimacy as antecedents of new venture funding in televised business pitches. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(5), 915–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00531.x
68.
RodaleJ. I. (1978). The synonym finderEditionL. (Ed.). Rodale.
69.
RomaP.PetruzzelliA. M.PerroneG. (2017). From the crowd to the market: The role of reward-based crowdfunding performance in attracting professional investors. Research Policy, 46(9), 1606–1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.012
70.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1988). How do i feel about it? The informative function of affective states. In FiedlerK.TorontoJ. F. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and social behavior. New evidence and integrative attempts (pp. 44–62). C.J. Hogrefe.
71.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 385–407). Guilford.
72.
ShaneS.DroverW.ClingingsmithD.CerfM. (2020). Founder passion, neural engagement and informal investor interest in startup pitches: An fMRI study. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105949.
73.
ShortJ. C.Christian BrobergJ.CogliserC. C.BrighamK. H. (2010). Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA). Organizational Research Methods, 13(2), 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109335949
SlovicP. (2010). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. Earthscan.
76.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregorD. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In GilovichT.GriffinD.KahnemanD. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implicaitons for the rationality debate?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–726. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435
79.
SteigenbergerN.WilhelmH. (2018). Extending signaling theory to rhetorical signals: Evidence from crowdfunding. Organization Science, 29(3), 357–546. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1195
80.
StoneD. N.ZiebartD. A. (1995). A model of financial incentive effects in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1020
81.
SudekR. (2006). Angel investment criteria. Small Business Strategy, 17(2), 89–104.
82.
TencaF.FranzoniC. (2019). Crowdfunding: Risk, fraud and regulation. In Handbook of research on crowdfunding. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117210.00020
83.
ThomasM.MorwitzV. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/429600
VallerandR. J.MageauG. A.RatelleC.LéonardM.BlanchardC.KoestnerR.GagnéM.MarsolaisJ. (2003). Les passions Del’Âme: On obsessive and harmonious passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756
86.
WarnickB. J.MurnieksC. Y.McMullenJ. S.BrooksW. T. (2018). Passion for entrepreneurship or passion for the product? A conjoint analysis of angel and VC decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.01.002
