This study examines the effects of family involvement on international market entry. Bridging theories of interorganizational imitation with the notion of socioemotional wealth protection, we argue that family-managed firms are more likely to act as “intuitive statisticians,” using the internationalization outcomes of industry peers to determine when to internationalize. An event history analysis of 2427 manufacturing firms supports this position. Family-managed firms’ likelihood to internationalize increases as prior entrants’ performance mean and variance increase. Ultimately, our study demonstrates that this imitation strategy enables family-managed firms to reduce risk and endure longer in broached international markets.
AlessandriT. M.CerratoD.EddlestonK. A. (2018). The mixed gamble of internationalization in family and nonfamily firms: The moderating role of organizational slack. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1201.
2.
AllisonP. D. (1995). Survival analysis using SAS: A practical guide. SAS Institute.
3.
AlmodóvarP.RugmanA. M. (2014). The M curve and the performance of Spanish international new ventures. British Journal of Management, 25(S1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12022.
4.
AmoreM. D.BennedsenM.Le Breton‐MillerI.MillerD. (2021). Back to the future: The effect of returning family successions on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(8), 1432–1458. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3273.
5.
AndersenP. K.GillR. D. (1982). Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. The Annals of Statistics, 10(4), 1100–1120. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345976.
6.
ArregleJ. L.DuranP.HittM. A.Van EssenM. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta‐analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12246.
7.
ArregleJ. L.NaldiL.NordqvistM.HittM. A. (2012). Internationalization of family-controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1115–1143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00541.x.
8.
BanerjeeA. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364.
BarkemaH. G.ShenkarO.VermeulenF.BellJ. H. J. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: How firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.5465/256889.
11.
BhaumikS. K.DriffieldN.PalS. (2010). Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 437–450. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.52.
12.
BikhchandaniS.HirshleiferD.WelchI. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849.
13.
BikhchandaniS.HirshleiferD.WelchI. (1998). Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(3), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.3.151.
14.
BoellisA.MariottiS.MinichilliA.PiscitelloL. (2016). Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8), 929–950. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2016.23.
15.
BromileyP.RauD. (2019). Some problems in using prospect theory to explain strategic management issues. Academy of Management Perspectives. in presshttps://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2018.0072.
16.
CalderaA. (2010). Innovation and exporting: Evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics, 146(4), 657–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-010-0065-7.
17.
CarneyM. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x.
CassimanB.VeugelersR. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470.
20.
CerratoD.PivaM. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9166-x.
21.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SharmaP. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x.
22.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211.
23.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.SteierL. P.RauS. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00540.x.
24.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A sehavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall.
25.
DavisP. S.DesaiA. B.FrancisJ. D. (2000). Mode of international entry: An isomorphism perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490904.
26.
De MassisA.AudretschD.UhlanerL.KammerlanderN. (2018a). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373.
27.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.KotlarJ.PetruzzelliA. M.WrightM. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017.
28.
De MassisA.FrattiniF.MajocchiA.PiscitelloL. (2018b). Family firms in the global economy: Toward a deeper understanding of internationalization determinants, processes and outcomes. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1199.
29.
DebellisF.RondiE.PlakoyiannakiE.De MassisA. (2021). Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 56(1), 101144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101144.
DeTienneD. R.ChiricoF. (2013). Exit strategies in family firms: How socioemotional wealth drives the threshold of performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1297–1318. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12067.
32.
DiMaggioP. J., & PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. . American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
33.
EllsbergD. (2001). Ambiguity and decision. Garland Publishing.
34.
EzellM. E.LandK. C.CohenL. E. (2003). Modeling multiple failure time data: A survey of variance–corrected proportional hazards models with empirical applications to arrest data. Sociological Methodology, 33(1), 111–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00129.x.
35.
FangH.KotlarJ.MemiliE.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA. (2018). The pursuit of international opportunities in family firms: Generational differences and the role of knowledge-based resources. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1197.
36.
FernándezZ.NietoM. J. (2005). Internationalization strategy of small and medium sized family businesses: Some influential factors. Family Business Review, 18(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00031.x.
37.
FernándezZ.NietoM. J. (2006). Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400196.
38.
FernhaberS. A.LiD. (2010). The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00365.x.
39.
FiedlerK.JuslinP. (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. Cambridge University Press.
40.
FiolC. M.O’ConnorE. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.8925227.
41.
FournéS. P. L.ZschocheM. (2020). Reducing uncertainty in follow‐up foreign direct investment: Imitation by family firms. Global Strategy Journal, 10(4), 839–860. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1331.
42.
GabaV.TerlaakA. (2013). Decomposing uncertainty and its effects on imitation in firm exit decisions. Organization Science, 24(6), 1847–1869. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0823.
43.
Garcia-SanchezJ.MesquitaL. F.VassoloR. S. (2014). What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger: The evolution of competition and entry‐order advantages in economically turbulent contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 35(13), 1972–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2189.
44.
GedajlovicE.ShapiroD. M. (2002). Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069381.
45.
GeorgeG. (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843944.
46.
GeorgeG.WiklundJ.ZahraS. A. (2005). Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271760.
47.
GimenoJ.HoskissonR. E.BealB. D.WanW. P. (2005). Explaining the clustering of international expansion moves: A critical test in the US telecommunications industry. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.16928411.
48.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320.
49.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106.
50.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00889.x.
51.
GravesC.ThomasJ. (2006). Internationalization of Australian family businesses: A managerial capabilities perspective. Family Business Review, 19(3), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00066.x.
52.
GravesC.ThomasJ. (2008). Determinants of the internationalization pathways of family firms: An examination of family influence. Family Business Review, 21(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2008.00119.x.
53.
GreeneW. H. (1997). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54.
GreenwoodR.DíazA. M.LiS. X.LorenteJ. C. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21(2), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0453.
GreveH. R. (2013). Microfoundations of management: Behavioral strategies and levels of rationality in organizational action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0091.
57.
HabbershonT. G.WilliamsM. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x.
58.
HannanM. T., & FreemanJ. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.
59.
HarrisonJ. S.BoivieS.SharpN. Y.GentryR. J. (2018). Saving face: How exit in response to negative press and star analyst downgrades reflects reputation maintenance by directors. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0471.
60.
HaunschildP. R.MinerA. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393735.
61.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352.
62.
HeniszW. J.DeliosA. (2001). Uncertainty, imitation, and plant location: Japanese multinational corporations, 1990‐1996. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094871.
63.
HennartJ. F.MajocchiA.ForlaniE. (2017). The myth of the stay-at-home family firm: How family-managed SMEs can overcome their internationalization limitations. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0091-y.
64.
HsiehK.-Y.TsaiW.ChenM.-J. (2015). If they can do it, why not us? Competitors as reference points for justifying escalation of commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0869.
65.
HutzschenreuterT.KleindienstI.SchmittM. (2014). How mindfulness and acquisition experience affect acquisition performance. Management Decision, 52(6), 1116–1147. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-07-2013-0376.
66.
KanoL.VerbekeA. (2018). Family firm internationalization: Heritage assets and the impact of bifurcation bias. Global Strategy Journal, 8(1), 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1186.
67.
KleinbaumD. G.KleinM. (1996). The Cox proportional hazards model and its characteristics. In KleinbaumD. G.KleinM. (Eds.), Survival analysis (pp. 86–128). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2555-1_3.
68.
KnickerbockerF. T. (1973). Oligopolistic reaction and multinational enterprise. The International Executive, 15(2), 7–9.
69.
KnightF. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner, and Marx.
70.
KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 37(6), 1263–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12065.
71.
KotlarJ.SignoriA.De MassisA.VismaraS. (2018). Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1073–1099. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0256.
72.
KraatzM. S. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6), 621–643. https://doi.org/10.5465/256961.
73.
LahiriS.MukherjeeD.PengM. W. (2020). Behind the internationalization of family SMEs: A strategy tripod synthesis. Global Strategy Journal, 10(4), 813–838. https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1376.
74.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2020). Ideals-based accountability and reputation in select family firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04225-5.
75.
LevinthalD.MarchJ. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2(4), 307–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3.
LieschP. W.KnightG. A. (1999). Information internalization and hurdle rates in small and medium enterprise internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490075.
81.
LumpkinG. T.BrighamK. H. (2011). Long‐term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1149–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00495.x.
82.
MataJ.PortugalP. (2002). The survival of new domestic and foreign‐owned firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.217.
83.
MazzelliA.KotlarJ.De MassisA. (2018). Blending in while standing out: Selective conformity and new product introduction in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 206–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717748651.
84.
MazzelliA.NasonR. S.De MassisA.KotlarJ. (2019). Causality rules: Performance feedback on hierarchically related goals and capital investment variability. Journal of Management Studies, 56(8), 1630–1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12432.
85.
MillerD.Breton-MillerI. L.LesterR. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. Strategic perspectives. Organization Science, 24(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0728.
86.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005). Managing for the long run. Harvard Business School Press.
87.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2020). Family firms: A breed of extremes?Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 45(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720964186.
88.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.LesterR. H. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 201–223.
89.
MitchellW.ShaverJ. M.YeungB. (1994). Foreign entrant survival and foreign market share: Canadian companies’ experience in United States medical sector markets. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150705.
90.
MusajiS.SchulzeW. S.De CastroJ. O. (2020). How long does it take to “get to” the learning curve?Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1145.
91.
NasonR.MazzelliA.CarneyM. (2019). The ties that unbind: Socialization and business-owning family reference point shift. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 846–870. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0289.
92.
Observatorio de la Empresa Multinacional Española (2008). La expansión de la multinacional Española: Estrategias y cambios organizativos.
93.
OliverN.CalvardT.PotočnikK. (2017). Cognition, technology, and organizational limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 disaster. Organization Science, 28(4), 729–743. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1138.
94.
PanQ.SchaubelD. E. (2008). Proportional hazards regression based on biased samples and estimated selection probabilities. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 36(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.5550360111.
95.
PatelP. C.CriacoG.NaldiL. (2018). Geographic diversification and the survival of born-globals. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2008–2036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316635251.
96.
PatelP. C.FietJ. O. (2011). Knowledge combination and the potential advantages of family firms in searching for opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00497.x.
97.
Rabe-HeskethS.SkrondalA.PicklesA. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random effects. Journal of Econometrics, 128(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.08.017.
98.
RaoH.GreveH. R.DavisG. F. (2001). Fool’s gold: Social proof in the initiation and abandonment of coverage by wall street analysts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 502–526. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094873.
99.
ReuberA. R. (2016). An assemblage‐theoretic perspective on the internationalization processes of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(6), 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12243.
100.
RheeJ. H.ChengJ. L. (2002). Foreign market uncertainty and incremental international expansion: The moderating effect of firm, industry, and host country factors. MIR: Management International Review, 42(4), 419–439.
101.
RommeA. G. L.ZolloM.BerendsP. (2010). Dynamic capabilities, deliberate learning and environmental dynamism: A simulation model. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1271–1299.
102.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.AstrachanJ. H.PieperT. M. (2012). The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: Exploring nonlinear effects. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9264-9.
103.
SirmonD. G.HittM. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013.
104.
SorensonO., & SørensenJ. B. (2001). Finding the right mix: Franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.185.
105.
SouderD.ZaheerA.SapienzaH.RanucciR. (2017). How family influence, socioemotional wealth, and competitive conditions shape new technology adoption. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1774–1790. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2614.
106.
StephanH.BoekerW.BaumJ. A. C.Greve (2001). Getting to multimarket competition: How multimarket contact affects firms’ market entry decisions. In SilvermanP. B. (Ed.), Advances in strategic management (vol. 18). JAI Press.
107.
TerlaakA.GongY. (2008). Vicarious learning and inferential accuracy in adoption processes. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 846–868. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421979.
108.
Wiedersheim-PaulF.OlsonH. C.WelchL. S. (1978). Pre-export activity: The first step in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 9(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490650.
109.
WilliamsonI. O.CableD. M. (2003). Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040628.
110.
WisemanR. M.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192967.
111.
WooldridgeJ. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.
112.
ZahraS. A. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family businesses: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00057-0.
