This study investigates how venture development programs such as private incubators, university incubators, and accelerators influence the success of participating nanotechnology startups. With the recent growth in such programs, empirical work is needed to compare their impact on participants across programs and with nonparticipants. Using data on firm bankruptcies, liquidation, government grants, and venture capital, we find benefits, but the influence of each venture development program varies greatly. We further investigate the influence of program services and resources to clarify program heterogeneity beyond existing typologies. The results clarify the role of these programs and ecosystem intermediaries.
AertsK.MatthyssensP.VandenbemptK. (2007). Critical role and screening practices of European business incubators. Technovation, 27(5), 254–267.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.002
AllenD. N.MccluskeyR. (1991). Structure, policy, services, and performance in the business incubator industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(2), 61–77.doi:10.1177/104225879101500207
4.
AllenD. N.RahmanS. (1985). Small business incubators: A positive environment for entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 23(3), 12–22.
5.
AllisonP. D. (2014). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Sage Publications.
6.
AmezcuaA.RatinhoT.PlummerL. A.JayamohanP. (2020). Organizational sponsorship and the economics of place: How regional urbanization and localization shape incubator outcomes. Journal of business venturing, 35(4), 105967.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105967
7.
AmezcuaA. S. (2010). Boon or boondoggle? Business incubation as entrepreneurship policy. Working Paper.
8.
AmezcuaA. S.GrimesM. G.BradleyS. W.WiklundJ. (2013). Organizational sponsorship and founding environments: A contingency view on the survival of business-incubated firms, 1994–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1628–1654.doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0652
9.
AroraA.FosfuriA.GambardellaA. (2001). Markets for technology. MIT Press.
10.
AroraA.NandkumarA. (2011). Cash-out or flameout! opportunity cost and entrepreneurial strategy: Theory, and evidence from the information security industry. Management Science, 57(10), 1844–1860.doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1381
11.
AudretschD. B.KeilbachM. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1242–1254.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00722.x
12.
AutioE.KenneyM.MustarP.SiegelD.WrightM. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.015
13.
BarberoJ. L.CasillasJ. C.RamosA.GuitarS. (2012). Revisiting incubation performance: How incubator typology affects results. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(5), 888–902.
14.
BarberoJ. L.CasillasJ. C.WrightM.GarciaA. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9308-9
15.
BarneyJ. B. (1991). The resource based view of strategy: Origins, implications, and prospects. Journal of Management, 17(1), 97–211.
16.
BatesT. (2005). Analysis of young, small firms that have closed: Delineating successful from unsuccessful closures. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 343–358.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.01.003
17.
BaumJ. A. C.OliverC. (1991). Institutional linkages and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 187–218.doi:10.2307/2393353
18.
BeckerB.GassmannO. (2006). Corporate incubators: Industrial R&D and what universities can learn from them. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 469–483.doi:10.1007/s10961-006-0008-6
19.
BeckmanC. M. (2006). The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 741–758.doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083030
BlankT. H. (2020). When incubator resources are crucial: Survival chances of student startups operating in an academic incubator. Journal of Technology Transfer, 23(2), 1–24.doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09831-4
22.
BlossfeldH. P.RohwerG. (2002). Techniques of event history modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
23.
BøllingtoftA.UlhøiJ. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency?Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.005
BonvillianW. B. (2011). The problem of political design in federal innovation organization. InFealingK. H.LaneJ. I.MarburgerJ. H.ShippS. S. (Eds.), The science of science policy. Stanford University Press.
26.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S. (1997). Time is of the essence: Event history models in political science. American Journal of Political Science, 1414–1461.
27.
BruneelJ.RatinhoT.ClarysseB.GroenA. (2012). The evolution of business incubators: Comparing demand and supply of business incubation services across different incubator generations. Technovation, 32(2), 110–121.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003
28.
CefisE.MarsiliO. (2006). Survivor: The role of innovation in firms’ survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626–641.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006
29.
ChanK. F.LauT. (2005). Assessing technology incubator programs in the science park: The good, the bad and the ugly. Technovation, 25(10), 1215–1228.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.010
30.
ClarysseB.WrightM.Van de VeldeE. (2011). Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spinoff companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420–1442.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00991.x
31.
ClaytonP.FeldmanM.LoweN. (2018). Behind the scenes: Intermediary organizations that facilitate science commercialization through entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104–124.doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0133
32.
CoffR. W. (1997). Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource‐based theory. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 374–402.doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707154063
33.
CohenS. L. (2013). What do accelerators do? Insights from incubators and angels. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 8(3–4), 19–25.doi:10.1162/INOV_a_00184
34.
CohenS. L.BinghamC. B.HallenB. L. (2019). The role of accelerator designs in mitigating bounded rationality in new ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 810–854.doi:10.1177/0001839218782131
35.
CohenS. L.FehderD. C.HochbergY.MurrayF. (2019). The design of startup accelerators. Research Policy, 48(7), 1781–1797.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.003
36.
CohenS. L.HochbergY. (2014). Accelerating startups: The seed accelerator phenomenon. Available at SSRN 2418000. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers
37.
ColomboM. G.DelmastroM. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.
38.
CooperC. E.HamelS. A.ConnaughtonS. L. (2012). Motivations and obstacles to networking in a university business incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(4), 433–453.doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9189-0
39.
CooperR. S. (2003). Purpose and performance of the small business innovation research (SBIR) program. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 137–151.doi:10.1023/A:1022212015154
40.
DavilaA.FosterG.GuptaM. (2003). Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(6), 689–708.doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00127-1
41.
DempwolfC. S.AuerJ.D’IppolitoM. (2014). Innovation accelerators: Defining characteristics among startup assistance organizations. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. https://www.sba.gov.
42.
DeTienneD. R.McKelvieA.ChandlerG. N. (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 255–272.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.007
43.
DingW.ChoiE. (2011). Divergent paths to commercial science: A comparison of scientists’ founding and advising activities. Research Policy, 40(1), 69–80.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.011
44.
EbbersJ. J. (2014). Networking behavior and contracting relationships among entrepreneurs in business incubators. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5), 1–23.doi:10.1111/etap.12032
45.
EveleensC. P.van RijnsoeverF. J.NiestenE. M. M. I. (2017). How network-based incubation helps start-up performance: A systematic review against the background of management theories. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(3), 676–713.doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9510-7
46.
FehderD. C.HochbergY. (2017). Accelerators and the regional supply of venture capital investment. Available at SSRN 2518668.
47.
FeldmanM. P.FrancisJ. L. (2004). Homegrown solutions: Fostering cluster formation. Economic Development Quarterly, 18(2), 127–137.doi:10.1177/0891242403262556
48.
FortuneA.MitchellW. (2012). Unpacking firm exit at the firm and industry levels: The adaptation and selection of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 33(7), 794–819.doi:10.1002/smj.972
49.
FurrN.KapoorR. (2018). Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 33–61.doi:10.1002/smj.2709
50.
Gonzalez-UribeJ.LeatherbeeM. (2018). The effects of business accelerators on venture performance: Evidence from start-up Chile. The Review of Financial Studies, 31(4), 1566–1603.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhx103
51.
GoswamiK.MitchellJ. R.BhagavatulaS. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 117–150.doi:10.1002/sej.1281
52.
GreveH. R. (2011). Fast and expensive: The diffusion of a disappointing innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 32(9), 949–968.doi:10.1002/smj.922
53.
GrimaldiR.GrandiA. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: An assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00076-2
54.
HallenB. L.CohenS.BinghamC. (2020). Do accelerators accelerate? If so, how?Organization Science, 31(2), 378–414.
55.
HannanM. T.FreemanJ. (1988). The ecology of organizational mortality: American labor unions, 1836–1985. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 25–52.doi:10.1086/228950
56.
HansenM. T.ChesbroughH. W.NohriaN.SullD. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84.
HausbergJ. P.KorreckS. (2018). Business incubators and accelerators: A co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–26.
59.
HochbergY. (2016). Accelerating entrepreneurs and ecosystems: The seed accelerator model. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 16(1), 25–51.doi:10.1086/684985
60.
HolcombT. R.HolmesR. M.Jr.ConnellyB. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457–485.doi:10.1002/smj.747
61.
HopeO.-K.ThomasW. B.VyasD. (2013). Financial reporting quality of US private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 1715–1742.doi:10.2308/accr-50494
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
64.
KnoppL. (2012). State of the business incubation industry. NBIA Research Series.
65.
KolympirisC.KleinP. G. (2017). The effects of academic incubators on University innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(2), 145–170.doi:10.1002/sej.1242
66.
LasradoV.SivoS.FordC.O’NealT.GaribayI. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 205–219.doi:10.1007/s10961-015-9412-0
67.
LernerJ. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285–318.doi:10.1086/209616
68.
LewisD. A.Harper-AndersonE.MolnaL. A. (2011). Incubating success: Incubation best practices that lead to successful new ventures. University of Michigan.
69.
LinkA. N.ScottJ. T. (2003). Science parks and the generation of university-based knowledge: An exploratory study. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1323–1356.
70.
LukešM.LongoM. C.ZouharJ. (2019). Do business incubators really enhance entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from a large sample of innovative Italian start-ups. Technovation, 82, 25–34.
71.
MadalenoM.NathanM.OvermanH. G.WaightsS. (2018). Incubators, accelerators and regional economic development. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11856.
72.
McAdamM.McAdamR. (2008). High tech start-ups in university science park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s life cycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.012
73.
McAdamM.MillerK.McAdamR. (2016). Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, 50–51(10), 69–78.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.002
74.
MianS. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25(3), 325–335.doi:10.1016/0048-7333(95)00828-4
75.
MianS. A.LamineW.FayolleA. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50–51(2), 1–12.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
OECD. (2019). Policy brief on incubators and accelerators that support inclusive entrepreneurship. Publications Office of the European Union.
78.
PattonD.MarlowS. (2011). University technology business incubators: Helping new entrepreneurial firms to learn to grow. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(5), 911–926.doi:10.1068/c10198b
79.
PattonD.WarrenL.BreamD. (2009). Elements that underpin high-tech business incubation processes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 621–636.doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9105-7
80.
PauwelsC.ClarysseB.WrightM.Van HoveJ. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50–51(2), 13–24.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
RothaermelF. T.ThursbyM. (2005). University-incubator firm knowledge flows: Assessing their impact on incubator firm performance. Research Policy, 34(3), 305–320.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.11.006
83.
RothaermelF. T.ThursbyM. (2007). The nanotech versus the biotech revolution: Sources of productivity in incumbent firm research. Research Policy, 36(6), 832–849.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.008
84.
RothschildL.DarrA. (2005). Technological incubators and the social construction of innovation networks: An Israeli case study. Technovation, 25(1), 59–67.doi:10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00064-6
85.
RubinT. H.AasT. H.SteadA. (2015). Knowledge flow in technological business incubators: Evidence from Australia and Israel. Technovation, 41–42(1–2), 11–24.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.03.002
86.
SchoonhovenC. B.EisenhardtK. M.LymanK. (1990). Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 177–207.doi:10.2307/2393555
87.
SchwartzM. (2009). Beyond incubation: An analysis of firm survival and exit dynamics in the post-graduation period. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(4), 403–421.doi:10.1007/s10961-008-9095-x
88.
SchwartzM. (2013). A control group study of incubators’ impact to promote firm survival. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 302–331.doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9254-y
89.
ScotchmerS. (2005). Innovation and incentives. MIT Press.
90.
ScottW. R.DavisG. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Pearson Prentice Hall.
91.
ShawJ. D.ParkT.-Y.KimE. (2013). A resource-based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 572–589.doi:10.1002/smj.2025
92.
SinghJ.TuckerD. J.HouseR. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171–193.doi:10.2307/2392787
93.
Small Business Administration. (2020). SBIR/STTR awards information. www.sbir.gov
SöderblomA.SamuelssonM.WiklundJ.SandbergR. (2015). Inside the black box of outcome additionality: Effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance. Research policy, 44(8), 1501–1512.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.009
96.
SoetantoD.JackS. (2016). The impact of university-based incubation support on the innovation strategy of academic spin-offs. Technovation, 50–51(10), 25–40.doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.11.001
97.
SoetantoD. P.JackS. L. (2013). Business incubators and the networks of technology-based firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(4), 432–453.doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9237-4
98.
SpigelB. (2017). The relational organization of Entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.doi:10.1111/etap.12167
StevensonR.KierA. S.TaylorS. G. (2021). Do policy makers take grants for granted? The efficacy of public sponsorship for innovative entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 231–253.
101.
StinchcombeA. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. InMarchJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp.142–193). Rand McNally.
102.
StokanE.ThompsonL.MahuR. J. (2015). Testing the differential effect of business incubators on firm growth. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 317–327.doi:10.1177/0891242415597065
103.
StuartT. E.HoangH.HybelsR. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 315–349.doi:10.2307/2666998
104.
ThompsonJ. (1967). Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill.
105.
TooleA. A.CzarnitzkiD. (2007). Biomedical academic entrepreneurship through the SBIR program. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 716–738.doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2006.05.011
106.
TooleA. A.TurveyC. (2009). How does initial public financing influence private incentives for follow-on investment in early-stage technologies?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(1), 43–58.doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9074-7
107.
Ubi-Global. (2015). 2014 university business incubators index. www.ubi-global.com
108.
van RijnsoeverF. J. (2020). Meeting, mating, and intermediating: How incubators can overcome weak network problems in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Research Policy, 49(1), 103884.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.103884
109.
Van RijnsoeverF. J.Van WeeleM. A.EveleensC. P. (2017). Network brokers or hit makers? Analyzing the influence of incubation on start-up investments. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 605–629.doi:10.1007/s11365-016-0416-5
110.
van WeeleM. A.van RijnsoeverF. J.GroenM.MoorsE. H. M. (2020). Gimme shelter? Heterogeneous preferences for tangible and intangible resources when choosing an incubator. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(4), 984–1015.doi:10.1007/s10961-019-09724-1
111.
von ZedtwitzM.GrimaldiR. (2006). Are service profiles incubator-specific? Results from an empirical investigation in Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.doi:10.1007/s10961-006-0007-7
112.
WagnerS.CockburnI. (2010). Patents and the survival of internet-related IPOs. Research Policy, 39(2), 214–228.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.003
113.
WangJ.ShapiraP. (2012). Partnering with universities: A good choice for nanotechnology start-up firms?Small Business Economics, 38(2), 197–215.doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9248-9
114.
WelterF. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
115.
WennbergK.WiklundJ.DeTienneD. R.CardonM. S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375.doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.001
116.
WennbergK.WiklundJ.WrightM. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143.doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014
117.
WoolleyJ. (2010). Technology emergence through entrepreneurship across multiple industries. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(1), 1–21.doi:10.1002/sej.80
WoolleyJ. L. (2017b). Origins and outcomes: Success of spin-offs from universities, firms, and government research centers and laboratories. Academy of Management Discoveries, 3, 64–90.
120.
WoolleyJ. L. (2019). Gender, education, and occupation: How founder experiences influence firm outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(3), 266–290.doi:10.5465/amd.2017.0069
121.
WrightM.DroriI. (2018). Accelerators: Successful venture creation and growth. Edward Elgar Publishing.
122.
YoutieJ.IacopettaM.GrahamS. (2008). Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: Can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology?The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 315–329.doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9030-6
123.
YuS. (2020). How do accelerators impact the performance of high-technology ventures?Management Science, 66(2), 530–552.doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3256
124.
ZahraS. A.WrightM.AbdelgawadS. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 32(5), 479–500.doi:10.1177/0266242613519807
125.
ZimmermanM. A.ZeitzG. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431.doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389921
