How does the socioemotional wealth (SEW) of a family firm affect its deal valuation in acquisition? Using a sample of 515 completed transactions of S&P 500 firms over the period 2003–2016, we examine a number of contexts and find that SEW creates differential valuations of targets by family firms vis-à-vis non-family firms. Particularly from an internationalization perspective, acquisitions may be an ideal option for family firms because foreign acquisitions may be loosely coupled from the core firm. Post-hoc analyses on the heterogeneity in family governance reveal that founder and descendant board chairs may have different perceptions of SEW.
AguinisH.Gomez-MejiaL. R.MartinG. P.JooH. (2018). CEO pay is indeed decoupled from CEO performance: Charting a path for the future. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 16(1), 117–136.doi:10.1108/MRJIAM-12-2017-0793
2.
AmihudY.LevB.TravlosN. G. (1990). Corporate control and the choice of investment financing: The case of corporate acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 45(2), 603–616.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03706.x
3.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00567
4.
AndersonR. C.ReebD. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.
5.
AndréP.Ben-AmarW.SaadiS. (2014). Family firms and high technology Mergers & Acquisitions. Journal of Management & Governance, 18(1), 129–158.doi:10.1007/s10997-012-9221-x
6.
ArregleJ.DuranP.HittM. A.EssenM. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta‐analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831.doi:10.1111/etap.12246
7.
ArregleJ. L.HittM. A.MariI. (2019). A missing link in family firms’ internationalization research: Family structures. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(5), 1–17.doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00213-z
8.
BarneyJ. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.doi:10.1177/014920639101700108
9.
BarneyJ. B. (1988). Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 9(S1), 71–78.doi:10.1002/smj.4250090708
10.
BarontiniR.CaprioL. (2006). The effect of family control on firm value and performance: Evidence from continental Europe. European Financial Management, 12(5), 689–723.doi:10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00273.x
11.
Ben-AmarW.AndréP. (2006). Separation of ownership from control and acquiring firm performance: The case of family ownership in Canada. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(3-4), 517–543.doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00613.x
12.
BerkovitchE.NarayananM. P. (1993). Motives for takeovers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(3), 347–362.doi:10.2307/2331418
13.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
14.
BrownD. T.RyngaertM. D. (1991). The mode of acquisition in takeovers: Taxes and asymmetric information. Journal of Finance, 46(2), 653–669.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb02678.x
15.
CaprioL.CrociE.Del GiudiceA. (2011). Ownership structure, family control, and acquisition decisions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1636–1657.doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2011.09.008
16.
CartwrightS.SchoenbergR. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: Recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17(S1), S1–S5.doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00475.x
17.
ChengY.HarfordJ.ZhangT. (2015). Bonus-driven repurchases. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 50(3), 447–475.doi:10.1017/S0022109015000149
18.
ChiricoF.Gómez-MejiaL. R.HellerstedtK.WithersM.NordqvistM. (2019). To merge, sell, or Liquidate? Socioemotional wealth, family control, and the choice of business exit. Journal of Management, 10, 014920631881872.doi:10.1177/0149206318818723
19.
CollinsJ. D.HolcombT. R.CertoS. T.HittM. A.LesterR. H. (2009). Learning by doing: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62(12), 1329–1334.doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.11.005
20.
CollisD. J.MontgomeryC. A.MontgomeryC. A. (1998). Corporate strategy: A resource-based approach. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
21.
CruzC. C.Gómez-MejiaL. R.BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.
22.
DjankovS.La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007
23.
DouJ.JacobyG.LiJ.SuY.WuZ. (2019). Family involvement and family firm internationalization: The Moderating effects of board experience and geographical distance. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 250–261.doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2018.12.004
24.
EdenL.MillerS. (2001, August). Opening the black box: Multinationals and the costs of doing business abroad. InAcademy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2001, pp.C1–C6). Academy of Management.
25.
FaccioM.MasulisR. W. (2005). The choice of payment method in European mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1345–1388.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00764.x
26.
FangH. C.SiauK. L.MemiliE.DouJ. (2019). Cognitive antecedents of family business bias in investment decisions: A commentary on “Risky decisions and the family firm bias: An experimental study based on prospect theory”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 409–416.
27.
Feito-RuizI.Menéndez-RequejoS. (2010). Family firm mergers and acquisitions in different legal environments. Family Business Review, 23(1), 60–75.doi:10.1177/0894486509353419
28.
Feito-RuizI.Menéndez-RequejoS. (2011). Cross-Border mergers and acquisitions in different legal environments. International Review of Law and Economics, 31(3), 169–187.
29.
FranksJ.MayerC.RossiS. (2009). Ownership: Evolution and regulation. Review of Financial Studies, 22(10), 4009–4056.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn108
30.
FresardL. (2010). Financial strength and product market behavior: The real effects of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Finance, 65(3), 1097–1122.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01562.x
31.
FullerK.NetterJ.StegemollerM. (2002). What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions. Journal of Finance, 57(4), 1763–1793.doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00477
32.
GeJ.CarneyM.KellermannsF. (2019). Who fills institutional voids? Entrepreneurs’ utilization of political and family ties in emerging markets. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(6), 1124–1147.doi:10.1177/1042258718773175
33.
GentryR.DibrellC.KimJ. (2016). Long–term orientation in publicly traded family businesses: Evidence of a dominant logic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(4), 733–757.doi:10.1111/etap.12140
34.
GlassmanR. B. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18(2), 83–98.doi:10.1002/bs.3830180202
35.
Gomez–MejiaL. R.CampbellJ. T.MartinG.HoskissonR. E.MakriM.SirmonD. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351–1374.
36.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
37.
Gomez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills Luis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
38.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family‐controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00889.x
39.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.PatelP. C.ZellwegerT. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369–1397.doi:10.1177/0149206315614375
40.
GranataD.ChiricoF. (2010). Measures of value in acquisitions: Family versus nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 23(4), 341–354.doi:10.1177/0894486510386367
41.
GuptaA.LeCompteR. L. B.MisraL. (1997). Acquisitions of solvent thrifts: Wealth effects and managerial motivations. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(10), 1431–1450.doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(97)00026-5
42.
HaleblianJ.DeversC. E.McNamaraG.CarpenterM. A.DavisonR. B. (2009). Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 35(3), 469–502.doi:10.1177/0149206308330554
43.
HansenR. G. (1987). A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business, 60(1), 75–95.doi:10.1086/296386
44.
HarrisM.RavivA. (1988). Corporate control contests and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 55–86.doi:10.1016/0304-405X(88)90040-2
45.
HarrisonJ. S.HittM. A.HoskissonR. E.IrelandR. D. (1991). Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations. Journal of Management, 17(1), 173–190.doi:10.1177/014920639101700111
46.
HaunschildP. R. (1994). How much is that company worth?: Interorganizational relationships, uncertainty, and acquisition premiums. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3), 391–411.doi:10.2307/2393296
47.
HaywardM. L. A.HambrickD. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 103–127.doi:10.2307/2393810
48.
HittM. A.HoskissonR. E.KimH. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.
49.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
50.
HolburnG. L.ZelnerB. A. (2010). Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power generation industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(12), 1290–1315.doi:10.1002/smj.860
51.
HuizingaH. P.VogetJ. (2009). International taxation and the direction and volume of cross‐border M&As. Journal of Finance, 64(3), 1217–1249.
52.
HymerS. H. (1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of foreign direct investment.
53.
JainB. A.ShaoY. (2014). Family involvement and post-IPO investment policy. Family Business Review, 27(4), 287–306.doi:10.1177/0894486514538044
54.
JamesH. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–55.doi:10.1080/13571519984304
JonesC. D.MakriM.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2008). Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded, family–controlled firms: The case of diversification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1007–1026.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00269.x
57.
JungK.KimY.-C.StulzR. (1996). Timing, investment opportunities, managerial discretion, and the security issue decision. Journal of Financial Economics, 42(2), 159–185.doi:10.1016/0304-405X(96)00881-1
58.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2003). Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002. The World Bank.
59.
KaufmannD.KraayA.MastruzziM. (2006). Measuring governance using cross-country perceptions data. International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption, 52.
60.
KimK.HaiderZ. A.WuZ.DouJ. (2019). Corporate social performance of family firms: A place-based perspective in the context of layoffs. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(1), 1–18.doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04152-5
61.
KitchingJ. (1974). Winning and losing with European acquisitions. Harvard Business Review, 52(2), 124–136.
62.
KogutB.SinghH. (1998). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490394
63.
KolevK.WisemanR. M.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2017). Do CEOs ever lose? Fairness perspective on the allocation of residuals between CEOs and shareholders. Journal of Management, 43(2), 610–637.doi:10.1177/0149206314535437
64.
KostovaT. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893938
65.
KotlarJ.SignoriA.De MassisA.VismaraS. (2018). Financial wealth, socioemotional wealth, and IPO underpricing in family firms: A two-stage gamble model. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1073–1099.doi:10.5465/amj.2016.0256
66.
LavertyK. J. (1996). Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 825–860.
67.
LeitterstorfM. P.WachterM. M. (2016). Takeover premiums and family blockholders. Family Business Review, 29(2), 214–230.doi:10.1177/0894486515622721
68.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 147–171.doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb00521.x
69.
MarkowitzH. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.
70.
MartinG. P.Gómez-MejíaL. R.WisemanR. (2013). Strategic implications of CEO compensation design: Revisiting the behavioral agency model. Academy of Management journal, 56(2), 451–472.
71.
MartynovaM.RenneboogL. (2008). Spillover of corporate governance standards in cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 200–223.doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.004
72.
MeziasJ. M. (2002). How to identify liabilities of foreignness and assess their effects on multinational corporations. Journal of International Management, 8(3), 265–282.doi:10.1016/S1075-4253(02)00069-8
73.
MillerD.Breton‐MillerL.LesterR. H. (2010). Family ownership and acquisition behavior in publicly‐traded companies. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2), 201–223.
74.
MillerD.Breton‐MillerL.ScholnickB. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non‐family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51–78.
75.
MillerD.SteierL.Breton-MillerL. (2016). What can scholars of entrepreneurship learn from sound family businesses?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 445–455.doi:10.1111/etap.12231
76.
MorosiniP.ShaneS.SinghH. (1998). National cultural distance and cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 137–158.doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490029
77.
MtarM. (2010). Institutional, industry and power effects on integration in cross-border acquisitions. Organization Studies, 31(8), 1099–1127.doi:10.1177/0170840610376147
78.
MyersS. C.MajlufN. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.doi:10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
79.
OplerT.PinkowitzL.StulzR.WilliamsonR. (1999). The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics, 52(1), 3–46.doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00003-3
80.
ParvinenP.TikkanenH. (2007). Incentive asymmetries in the mergers and acquisitions process. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 759–787.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00698.x
81.
PortaR. L.Lopez‐de‐SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.doi:10.1086/250042
82.
RequejoI.Reyes-ReinaF.Sanchez-BuenoM. J.Suárez-GonzálezI. (2018). European family firms and acquisition propensity: A comprehensive analysis of the legal system’s role. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(1), 44–58.doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.01.003
83.
RollR. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.doi:10.1086/296325
84.
RostandA. (1994). Optimizing managerial decisions during the acquisition integration process [Paper presentation]. 14th Annual Strategic Management Society International Conference, Paris.
85.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4378020
86.
SchulzeW. S.LubatkinM. H.DinoR. N.BuchholtzA. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.99.10114
ServaesH.ZennerM. (1996). The role of investment banks in acquisitions. Review of Financial Studies, 9(3), 787–815.doi:10.1093/rfs/9.3.787
89.
SharmaP.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.SteierL. P. (2019). Family firm behavior from a psychological perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042258719879675.
90.
ShleiferA.VishnyR. W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 70(3), 295–311.doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00211-3
91.
SpamannH. (2009). The “antidirector rights index” revisited. Review of Financial Studies, 23(2), 467–486.doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp067
92.
StanleyL. J.Hernández-LinaresR.López-FernándezM. C.KellermannsF. W. (2019). A typology of family firms: An investigation of entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Family Business Review, 0894486519838120.
93.
StanleyL. J.KellermannsF. W.ZellwegerT. M. (2017). Latent profile analysis: Understanding family firm profiles. Family Business Review, 30(1), 84–102.
94.
StewartA.HittM. A. (2012). Why can’ta family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms. Family Business Review, 25(1), 58–86.
95.
StulzR. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25–54.
96.
StyronW. (1979). Sophie’s choice (1st trade ed.). Random House.
97.
TangH. (2008). Family firms, acquisitions, and divestitures. ProQuest.
98.
TosiH. L.WernerS.KatzJ. P.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2000). How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies. Journal of Management, 26(2), 301–339.doi:10.1177/014920630002600207
99.
TravlosN. G. (1987). Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms’ stock returns. Journal of Finance, 42(4), 943–963.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb03921.x
100.
VillalongaB.AmitR. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value?Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
101.
WansleyJ. W.LaneW. R.YangH. C. (1987). Gains to bidder firms in cash and securities transactions. Financial Review, 22(4), 403–414.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6288.1987.tb01263.x
102.
WeickK. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.doi:10.2307/2391875
103.
WernerfeltB. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.doi:10.1002/smj.4250050207
104.
WisemanR. M.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.doi:10.5465/amr.1998.192967
105.
XieE.ReddyK. S.LiangJ. (2017). Country-specific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127–183.doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005
106.
ZaheerS. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341–363.
107.
ZahraS. A.HaytonJ. C.SalvatoC. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non–family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2004.00051.x
108.
ZellwegerT. M.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0665
