We extend McLarty, Vardaman, and Barnett’s analysis of how family firm supervisor attributes, in terms of familial status and socioemotional wealth importance, affect supervisee performance by considering the supervisee attributes. We further integrate the concept of restricted and generalized social exchange to provide a theoretical basis for how hierarchical dyadic (in)congruence moderates the relationship between supervisee commitment and performance. By providing a more fine-grained conceptualization, we contribute to the family business literature at its organization behavior interface.
BernhardF.O’DriscollM. P. (2011) Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees’ work attitudes and behaviors. Group & Organization Management36(3): 345–384.
2.
BlauP. M. (1964) Exchange and power in social life, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
3.
CarsrudA. L. (2006) Commentary: “Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm”: It all depends on perceptions of family, fairness, equity, and justice. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 855–860.
4.
CorbettaG.SalvatoC. (2004) Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28(4): 355–362.
5.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
6.
DaspitJ. J.HoltD. T.ChrismanJ. J.LongR. G. (2016) Examining family firm succession from a social exchange perspective: A multiphase, multistakeholder review. Family Business Review29(1): 44–64.
7.
DebickiB. J.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.PearsonA. W.SpencerB. A. (2016) Development of a Socioemotional Wealth Importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy7(1): 47–57.
8.
DeephouseD. L.JaskiewiczP. (2013) Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. Journal of Management Studies50(3): 337–360.
9.
GagnéM.SharmaP.De MassisA. (2014) The study of organizational behaviour in family business. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology23(5): 643–656.
10.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(4): 1199–1228.
11.
HoltD. T.MadisonK.KellermannsF. W. (2017) Variance in family members’ assessments: The importance of dispersion modeling in family firm research. Family Business Review30(1): 61–83.
12.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD. (2014) Temporal considerations in the study of family firms: Reflections on “the study of organizational behaviour in family business”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology23(5): 669–673.
13.
Le Breton-MillerI.MillerD.LesterR. H. (2011) Stewardship or agency? A social embeddedness reconciliation of conduct and performance in public family businesses. Organization Science22(3): 704–721.
14.
LongR. G.MathewsK. M. (2011) Ethics in the family firm: Cohesion through reciprocity and exchange. Business Ethics Quarterly21(2): 287–308.
15.
McLarty, B. D., Vardaman, J. M., & Barnett, T. (2019). Congruence in exchange: The influence of supervisors on employee performance in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice43(2), 302–321.
16.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2014) Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(4): 713–720.
17.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI.MinichilliA.CorbettaG.PittinoD. (2014) When do non-family CEOs outperform in family firms? Agency and behavioural agency perspectives. Journal of Management Studies51(4): 547–572.
18.
SciasciaS.MazzolaP.KellermannsF. W. (2014) Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: Introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy5(2): 131–137.
19.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2018) Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review31(1): 54–79.
20.
UeharaE. (1990) Dual exchange theory, social networks, and informal social support. American Journal of Sociology96(3): 521–557.
21.
VallejoM. C. (2008) Is the culture of family firms really different? A value-based model for its survival through generations. Journal of Business Ethics81(2): 261–279.
22.
Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (2018). Socio-emotional wealth separation and decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The moderating role of psychological safety. Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 648–676.
23.
VardamanJ. M.AllenD. G.RogersB. L. (2018) We are friends but are we family? Organizational identification and nonfamily employee turnover. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice42(2): 290–309.
24.
WardJ. (1987) Keeping the family business healthy: How to plan for continuing growth, profitability, and family leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
25.
ZhangZ.WangM.ShiJ. (2012) Leader-follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 111–130.
