This article explores the counterintuitive notion that congruence in the importance family firm supervisors and their employees place on socioemotional wealth is negatively associated with employee citizenship and proactive behaviors, while incongruence has positive effects. Results from polynomial regression analysis of data collected from 159 family firm supervisor–employee dyads support our complacency theory-based model, suggesting that congruence creates attentional lethargy and complacency toward organizational citizenship and proactivity while incongruence makes the need to engage in beneficial behaviors more salient. The negative effects of congruence are alleviated by higher levels of leader–member exchange. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AnderssonF. W.JohanssonD.KarlssonJ.LodefalkM.PoldahlA. (2018). The characteristics of family firms: Exploiting information on ownership, kinship, and governance using total population data. Small Business Economics, 51(3), 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
2.
BarnettT.KellermannsF. W. (2006). Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00155.x
3.
BernerthJ. B.CarterM. Z.ColeM. S. (2022). The (in) congruence effect of leaders’ narcissism identity and reputation on performance: A socioanalytic multistakeholder perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(10), 1725. https:///doi/10.1037/apl0000974
4.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
5.
CarterM. Z.ArmenakisA. A.FeildH.MossholderK. W. (2013). Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1824
6.
CarterM. Z.MossholderK. W. (2015). Are we on the same page? The performance effects of congruence between supervisor and group trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1349–1363. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038798
7.
CarterM. Z.MossholderK. W.FeildH.ArmenakisA. A. (2014). Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of supervisor-subordinate racial and gender dissimilarity. Group & Organization Management, 39, 691–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114551605
8.
ChiaburuD. S.SmithT. A.WangJ.ZimmermanR. D. (2014). Relative importance of leader influences for subordinates’ proactive behaviors, prosocial behaviors, and task performance. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000105
9.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
10.
Christensen-SalemA.MesquitaL. F.HashimotoM.HomP. W.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2021). Family firms are indeed better places to work than non-family firms! Socioemotional wealth and employees’ perceived organizational caring. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(1), 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100412
11.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
ColquittJ. A.BaerM.D.LongD. M.Halvorsen-GanepolaM. D. K. (2014). Scale indicators of social exchange relationships: A comparison of relative content validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 599–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036374
13.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
14.
CruzC.Gómez-MejiaL. R.BecerraM. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO-TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036975
15.
DavilaJ.DuranP.Gómez-MejíaL.Sanchez-BuenoM. J. (2023). Socioemotional wealth and family firm performance: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 14(2), 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2022.100536
16.
DebickiB. J.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.PearsonA. W.SpencerB. A. (2016). Development of a Socioemotional Wealth Importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.01.002
17.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. W. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350–400). Jossey-Bass.
18.
EdwardsJ. R. (2008). Person–environment fit in organizations: An assessment of theoretical progress. The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 167–230. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211503
19.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD. M. (2009). The value of value congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 654–677. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014891
20.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi:10.3758/bf03193146
21.
FreseM.FayD.HilburgerT.LengK.TagA. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00639.x
22.
GibsonC. B.CooperC. D.CongerJ. A. (2009). Do you see what we see? The complex effects of perceptual distance between leaders and teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013073
23.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.CruzC.BerroneP.De CastroJ. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
24.
Gomez-MejiaL. R.PatelP. C.ZellwegerT. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1369–1397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315614375
25.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approaches to leadership: Development of the leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
26.
HekmanD. R.AquinoK.OwensB. P.MitchellT. R.SchilpzandP.LeavittK. (2010). An examination of whether and how racial and gender biases influence customer satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 238–264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388763
27.
IliesR.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.269
28.
JaskiewiczP.CombsJ. G.ShanineK. K.KacmarK. M. (2017). Introducing the family: A review of family science with implications for management research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 309–341. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0053
29.
JaskiewiczP.KleinS. (2007). The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research, 60, 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.015
30.
KawallJ. (2006). On complacency. American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(4), 343–355.
31.
KellermannsF. W.WalterJ.FloydS. W.LechnerC.ShawJ. C. (2011). To agree or not to agree? A meta-analytical review of strategic consensus and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.004
32.
KellermannsF. W.WalterJ.LechnerC.FloydS. W. (2005). The lack of consensus about strategic consensus: Advancing theory and research. Journal of Management, 31(5), 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279114
33.
KluemperD. H.DeGrootT.ChoiS. (2013). Emotion management ability: Predicting task performance, citizenship, and deviance. Journal of Management, 39(4), 878–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311407326
34.
KluemperD. H.McLartyB. D.BingM. N. (2015). Acquaintance ratings of the big five personality traits: Incremental validity beyond and interactive effects with self-reports in the prediction of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037810
35.
LeeK.AllenN. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.131
36.
LiaoE. Y.HuiC. (2021). A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38, 317–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9594-8
37.
LidenR. C.MaslynJ. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24, 43–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(99)80053-1
38.
LucianoM. M.BartelsA. L.D’InnocenzoM. M.MaynardM. T.MathieuJ. E. (2018). Shared team experiences and team effectiveness: Unpacking the contingent effects of entrained rhythms and task characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1403–1430. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0828
39.
MadisonK.DaspitJ. J.TurnerK.KellermannsF. W. (2018). Family firm human resource practices: Investigating the effects of professionalization and bifurcation bias on performance. Journal of Business Research, 84, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.06.021
40.
MadisonK.EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W.PowellG. N. (2021). Kinship and gender in family firms: New insights into employees’ organizational citizenship behavior. Family Business Review, 34(3), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211008062
41.
MarlerL. E.BarnettT.VardamanJ. M. (2019). Justice in the family firm: An integrative review and future research agenda. In MemiliE.DibrellC. (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of heterogeneity among family firms (pp. 589–612). Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (2005). Scaling the quality of teammates’ mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.296
43.
McLartyB. D.VardamanJ. M.BarnettT. (2019). Congruence in exchange: The influence of supervisors on employee performance in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(2), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258718796079
44.
MeadeA. W.CraigS. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
45.
MillsJ.ClarkM. S. (1982). Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 121–144.
46.
NikolaevB.BoudreauxC. J.WoodM. (2020). Entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: The mediating role of psychological functioning. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(3), 557–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719830314
47.
OrganD. W.RyanK. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775–802. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x
48.
ParkeM. R.TangiralaS.HussainI. (2020). Creating organizational citizens: How and when supervisor- versus peer-led role interventions change organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1714–1733. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000848
49.
ParkerS. K.WangY.LiaoJ. (2019). When is proactivity wise? A review of factors that influence the individual outcomes of proactive behavior. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015302
50.
ParkerS. K.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
51.
PenneyC.VardamanJ.MarlerL.Antin-YatesV. (2019). An image theory of strategic decision making in family businesses. Journal of Family Business Management, 9(4), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-05-2019-0032
52.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
53.
RaupR. B. (1925). Complacency: The foundation of human behavior. Macmillan.
54.
RotundoM.SackettP. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66
55.
SladeJ. A. (1928). Review of complacency, the foundation of human behavior, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 23(2), 257–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065446
56.
TaborW.ChrismanJ. J.MadisonK.VardamanJ. M. (2018). Nonfamily members in family firms: A review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 31(1), 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517734683
57.
VafeasM.HughesT. (2021). Inertia, boredom, and complacency in business-to-business relationships: Identifying and interpreting antecedents and manifestations. Journal of Business Research, 130, 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.038
58.
VancouverJ. B.MillsapR. E.PetersP. A. (1994). Multilevel analysis of organizational goal congruence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 666–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.666
59.
VardamanJ. M.AllenD. G.RogersB. L. (2018). We are friends but are we family? Organizational identification and nonfamily employee turnover. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717749235
60.
VardamanJ. M.GondoM. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12126
61.
VardamanJ. M.MarkinE. T.PenneyC. R.MarlerL. E.MckeeD. L. N. (2022). Willing and able? The screening and adoption of habitual family venture opportunities. Family Business Review, 35(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211059467
62.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2012). The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family–based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1183–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00545.x
63.
VogelR.RodellJ. B.LynchJ. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1561–1584. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0850
64.
WheelerA.R.ShanineK.K.LeonM.R.WhitmanM.V. (2014). Student-recruited samples in organizational research: A review, analysis, and guidelines for future research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12042
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
