Calling upon stakeholder theory and the socioemotional wealth (SEW) literature, we investigate how SEW impacts the decline-stemming strategies of family firms. Drawing on a recent conceptualization of SEW, we validate a two-dimensional measurement of the construct using a content analysis technique. Our empirical test on a sample of publicly traded family firms in need of turnaround suggests that the strategic preferences of family firms change depending upon the type of SEW (extended vs. restricted) the owning family values the most. The fine-grained characterization of SEW adopted in this study accounts for within-family-firm differences and thus enables the reconciliation of conflicting findings in the literature.
AbebeM. A.TangpongC. (2018). Founder-CEOs and corporate turnaround among declining firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review26(1): 45–57.
2.
AmernicJ.CraigR.TourishD. (2007). The transformational leader as pedagogue, physician, architect, commander, and saint: Five root metaphors in Jack Welch’s letters to stockholders of General Electric. Human Relations60: 1839–1872.
3.
ArogyaswamyK.BarkerI.Yasai-ArdekaniM. (1995). Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage mode. Journal of Management Studies32(4): 493–525.
4.
BarkerV. L.MoneM. A. (1994). Retrenchment: Cause of turnaround or consequence of decline?Strategic Management Journal15(5): 395–405. 10.1002/smj.4250150506
5.
BarrP. S.StimpertJ. L.HuffA. S. (1992). Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal. Strategic Management Journal13(S1): 15–36. 10.1002/smj.4250131004
6.
BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review25(3): 258–279.
7.
BlockJ. (2010). Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review23(2): 109–130.
8.
BrighamK. H.LumpkinG. T.PayneG. T.ZacharyM. A. (2014). Researching long-term orientation: A validation study and recommendations for future research. Family Business Review27(1): 72–88.
9.
BromileyP. (2009). The behavioral foundations of strategic management, New York: Wiley.
10.
BrutonG. D.AhlstromD.WanJ. C. C. (2003). Turnaround in East Asian firms: Evidence from ethnic Overseas Chinese communities. Strategic Management Journal24(6): 519–540. 10.1002/smj.312
11.
BrutonG. D.OviattB. M.WhiteM. A. (1994). Performance of acquisitions of distressed firms. Academy of Management Journal37(4): 972–989.
12.
CasillasJ. C.PastorF. (2015). The top 250 multinational family firms. Chair of Santander family business, Seville, Spain: University of Seville.
13.
CaterJ.SchwabA. (2008). Turnaround strategies in established small family firms. Family Business Review21(1): 31–50.
14.
CennamoC.BerroneP.CruzC.Gómez-MejíaL. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth and proactive stakeholder engagement: Why family-controlled firms care more about their stakeholders. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(6): 1153–1173.
15.
ChiricoF.SalvatoC.ByrneB.AkhterN.Arriaga MúzquizJ. (2018). Commitment escalation to a failing family business. Journal of Small Business Management56(3): 494–512. 10.1111/jsbm.12316
16.
ChoiY. R.ShepherdD. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management31(4): 573–596. 10.1177/0149206304272294
17.
ChrismanJ. J.PatelP. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal55(4): 976–997.
18.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.De MassisA. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice39(2): 173–182.
19.
ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J.BergielE. B. (2009). An agency theoretic analysis of the professionalized family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33(2): 355–372.
20.
ChungC. N.LuoX. (2008). Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organization Science19(5): 766–784.
21.
ColquittJ. A.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal. Academy of Management Journal50(6): 1281–1303.
22.
CruzC.JustoR. (2017). Portfolio entrepreneurship as a mixed gamble: A winning bet for family entrepreneurs in SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management55(4): 571–593.
23.
CruzC.Larraza-KintanaM.Garcés-GaldeanoL.BerroneP. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(6): 1295–1316.
24.
De MassisA.KotlarJ.ChuaJ. H.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Ability and willingness as sufficiency conditions for family-oriented particularistic behavior: Implications for theory and empirical studies. Journal of Small Business Management52(2): 344–364.
25.
DebickiB. J.KellermannsF. W.ChrismanJ. J.PearsonA. W.SpencerB. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy7(1): 47–57.
26.
DeckerC. (2016). Stakeholders’ impact on turnaround performance: The case of German savings banks. Journal of Small Business Management. Advance online publication. 10.1111/jsbm.12274
27.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review20(1): 65–91. 10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
28.
D’AveniR. A. (1989). The aftermath of organizational decline: A longitudinal study of the strategic and managerial characteristics of declining firms. Academy of Management Journal32(3): 577–605.
29.
D’AveniR. A.MacMillanI. C. (1990). Crisis and the content of managerial communications: A study of the focus of attention of top managers in surviving and failing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly35(4): 634–657.
30.
EssenM.StrikeV. M.CarneyM.SappS. (2015). The resilient family firm: Stakeholder outcomes and institutional effects. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(3): 167–183.
31.
FaccioM.LangL. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics65(3): 365–395. 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0
32.
FaghfouriP.KraiczyN. D.HackA.KellermannsF. W. (2015). Ready for a crisis? How supervisory boards affect the formalized crisis procedures of small and medium-sized family firms in Germany. Review of Managerial Science9(2): 317–338.
33.
FilatotchevI.TomsS. (2006). Corporate governance and financial constraints on strategic turnarounds. Journal of Management Studies43: 407–433.
34.
FreemanR. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
35.
FroomanJ. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review24(2): 191–205.
36.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.HaynesK. T.Núñez-NickelM.JacobsonK. J. L.Moyano-FuentesJ. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly52(1): 106–137.
37.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.MakriM.KintanaM. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies47(2): 223–252.
38.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.NeacsuI.MartinG. (2017). CEO risk-taking and socioemotional wealth: The Behavioral Agency model, family control, and CEO option wealth. Journal of Management15(4): 014920631772371. 10.1177/0149206317723711
39.
Gómez-MejíaL. R.PatelP. C.ZellwegerT. M. (2018). In the horns of the dilemma: Socioemotional wealth, financial wealth, and acquisitions in family firms. Journal of Management44(4): 1369–1397. 10.1177/0149206315614375
40.
HartR. P. (2000). Diction 5.0: The text-analysis program, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
HauckJ.Suess-ReyesJ.BeckS.PrüglR.FrankH. (2016). Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and-managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER Scale. Journal of Family Business Strategy7(3): 133–148.
42.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47(1): 153–161. 10.2307/1912352
43.
HolstiO. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
44.
HsuehJ. W. -J. (2016). Socio-emotional wealth: Disentangling corporate social responsibility performance of family firms. Academy of Management Proceedings2016(1): 15511. 10.5465/ambpp.2016.15511abstract
45.
JawaharI. M.MclaughlinG. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review26(3): 397–414. 10.5465/amr.2001.4845803
46.
KavadisN.CastañerX. (2015). Who drives corporate restructuring? Co-existing owners in French firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(5): 417–433.
47.
KhandwallaP. N. (1983). Turnaround management of mismanaged complex organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization13(4): 5–41.
48.
LaiJ.SudarsanamS. (1997). Corporate restructuring in response to performance decline: Impact of ownership. governance, and lenders. European Finance Review1(2): 197–233.
49.
MartinG. P.Gómez-MejíaL. R.WisemanR. M. (2013). Executive stock options as mixed gambles: Revisiting the behavioral agency model. Academy of Management Journal56(2): 451–472.
50.
McKennyA. F.ShortJ. C.ZacharyM. A.PayneG. T. (2011). Assessing espoused goals in private family firms using content analysis. Family Business Review25(3): 298–317.
51.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerL. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(4): 713–720.
52.
MillerD.Breton-MillerI. L.LesterR. H. (2013). Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs. strategic perspectives. Organization Science24(1): 189–209.
53.
MorrowJ. L.JohnsonR. A.BusenitzL. W. (2004). The effects of cost and asset retrenchment on firm performance: The overlooked role of a firm’s competitive environment. Journal of Management30(2): 189–208. 10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.002
54.
PajunenK. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies43(6): 1261–1288.
55.
PanditN. R. (2000). Some recommendations for improved research on corporate turnaround. Management3(2): 31.
56.
PatelP. C.ChrismanJ. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal35(4): 617–627.
57.
PearceJ. A.IIRobbinsD. K. (1993). Toward improved theory and research on business turnaround. Journal of Management19(3): 613–636.
58.
ReayT.WhettenD. A. (2011). What constitutes a theoretical contribution in family business?Family Business Review24: 105–110.
59.
RobbinsD. K.PearceJ. A. (1992). Turnaround: Retrenchment and recovery. Strategic Management Journal13(4): 287–309. 10.1002/smj.4250130404
60.
RodaleJ.I. (1978). The synonym finder, Emmaus, PA: Rodale Press.
61.
SalvatoC.AldrichH. E. (2012). “That’s Interesting!” in family business research. Family Business Review25(2): 125–135.
62.
SchmittA.RaischS. (2013). Corporate turnarounds: The duality of retrenchment and recovery. Journal of Management Studies50(7): 1216–1244.
63.
ShortJ. C.BrobergJ. C.CogliserC. C.BrighamK. H. (2010). Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA): An illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational Research Methods13(2): 1–28.
64.
ShortJ. C.PalmerT. B. (2003). Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes90(2): 209–224. 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00530-7
65.
ShortJ. C.PalmerT. B. (2008). The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods11(4): 727–752. 10.1177/1094428107304534
66.
StrikeV. M.BerroneP.SappS. G.CongiuL. (2015). A socioemotional wealth approach to CEO career horizons in family firms. Journal of Management Studies52(4): 555–583.
67.
SuttonR.ICallahanA. L. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. Academy of Management Journal30(3): 405–436.
68.
TangpongC.AbebeM.LiZ. (2015). A temporal approach to retrenchment and successful turnaround in declining firms. Journal of Management Studies52(5): 647–677.
69.
TrahmsC. A.NdoforH. A.SirmonD. G. (2013). Organizational decline and turnaround a review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management39(5): 1277–1307.
70.
VardamanJ. M.GondoM. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(6): 1317–1322.
71.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
72.
ZacharyM. A.McKennyA.ShortJ. C.PayneG. T. (2011). Family business and market orientation: Construct validation and comparative analysis. Family Business Review24(3): 233–251.
73.
ZellwegerT. M.AstrachanJ. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review21(4): 347–363.
74.
ZellwegerT. M.NasonR. S. (2008). A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance. Family Business Review21(3): 203–216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
