Although founders are responsible for soliciting venture capital (VC) funding, their influence over VC syndicate formation has largely been neglected in the extant literature. This article fills this gap by comparing serial and novice entrepreneurs. Using the information asymmetry argument as our guiding framework, we argue that when potential investors face diminished information asymmetry, entrepreneurs are more likely to form VC syndicates that are more beneficial to ventures—providing entrepreneurs with greater and more diverse resources and to some extent reducing entrepreneurs’ loss of control. Enriched by qualitative evidence from fieldwork, a quantitative analysis of 351 ventures shows general support for our argument and reveals unexpected nuances.
AmitR.GlostenL.MullerE. (1993) Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies30(5): 815–834.
4.
AnconaD.CaldwellD. (1992) Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science3(3): 321–341.
5.
AndrieuG.GrohA. P. (2012) Entrepreneurs' financing choice between independent and bank-affiliated venture capital firms. Journal of Corporate Finance18(5): 1143–1167.
6.
BarberB. M.YasudaA. (2017) Interim fund performance and fundraising in private equity. Journal of Financial Economics124(1): 172–194.
7.
BarrotJ.-N. (2016) Investor horizon and the life cycle of innovative firms: Evidence from venture capital. Management Science63(9): 3021–3043.
8.
BeckmanC. M.BurtonM. D. (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organization Science19(1): 3–24.
9.
BirleyS. (1985) The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 107–117.
10.
BlauP. M. (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure, New York, NY: Free Press.
11.
BonacichP. (1987) Power and centrality. American Sociological Review92(5): 1170–1182.
12.
BottazziL.Da RinM.HellmannT. (2008) Who are the active investors?: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics89(3): 488–512.
13.
BranderJ. A.AmitR.AntweilerW. (2002) Venture-capital syndication: Improved venture selection vs the value-added hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy11(3): 423–452.
14.
BranderJ. A.DuQ.HellmannT. (2014) The effects of government-sponsored venture capital: International evidence. Review of Finance19(2): 571–618.
15.
BygraveW. D. (1987) Syndicated investments by venture capital firms: A networking perspective. Journal of Business Venturing2(2): 139–154.
16.
BygraveW. D. (1988) The structure of the investment networks of venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing3(2): 137–158.
17.
BygraveW. D.TimmonsJ. A. (1992) Venture capital at the crossroads, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
18.
ChahineS.ArthursJ. D.FilatotchevI.HoskissonR. E. (2012) The effects of venture capital syndicate diversity on earnings management and performance of IPOs in the US and UK: An institutional perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance18(1): 179–192.
19.
ChakrabortyI.EwensM. (2017). Managing performance signals through delay: Evidence from venture capital. Management Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2662.
20.
CohenB. D.DeanT. J. (2005) Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal26(7): 683–690.
21.
ColemanJ. S. (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
22.
ColemanJ. S. (1990) Foundations of social theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
CopeJ. (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4): 373–397.
24.
DavilaA.FosterG.GuptaM. (2003) Venture capital financing and the growth of startup firms. Journal of Business Venturing18(6): 689–708.
25.
DelmarF.ShaneS. (2006) Does experience matter? The effect of founding team experience on the survival and sales of newly founded ventures. Strategic Organization4(3): 215–247.
26.
DimovD.GedajlovicE. (2010) A property rights perspective on venture capital investment decisions. Journal of Management Studies47(7): 1248–1271.
27.
DushnitskyG.LenoxM. J. (2005) When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures?Strategic Management Journal26(10): 947–965.
28.
DushnitskyG.ShaverJ. M. (2009) Limitations to interorganizational knowledge acquisition: The paradox of corporate venture capital. Strategic Management Journal30: 1045–1064.
29.
FietJ. O. (1995) Risk avoidance strategies in venture capital markets. Journal of Management Studies32(4): 551–574.
GompersP.GornallW.KaplanS. N.StrebulaevI. A. (2016). How do venture capitalists make decisions?National Bureau of Economic Research.
32.
GompersP.KovnerA.LernerJ.ScharfsteinD. (2010) Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics96: 18–32.
33.
GompersP.LernerJ. (2004) The venture capital cycle, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
34.
GompersP. A. (1995) Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance50(5): 1461–1489.
35.
GormanM.SahlmanW. A. (1989) What do venture capitalists do?Journal of Business Venturing4: 231–248.
36.
GouldR. V. (2002) The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology107(5): 1143–1178.
37.
GulatiR. (1995) Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal38(1): 85–112.
38.
GulatiR.GargiuloM. (1999) Where do interorganizational networks come from?American Journal of Sociology104(5): 1439–1493.
39.
GulerI. (2007) Throwing good money after bad? Political and institutional influences on sequential decision making in the venture capital industry. Administrative Science Quarterly52(2): 248–285.
40.
HallenB. L. (2008) The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations: From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments?Administrative Science Quarterly53(4): 685–718.
41.
HallenB. L.EisenhardtK. M. (2012) Catalyzing strategies and efficient tie formation: How entrepreneurs obtain venture capital ties. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 35–70.
42.
HeidlR. A.SteensmaH. K.PhelpsC. (2014) Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances. Organization Science25(5): 1351–1371.
43.
HellmannT.LindseyL.PuriM. (2008) Building relationships early: Banks in venture capital. The Review of Financial Studies21(2): 513–541.
44.
HellmannT.PuriM. (2002) Venture capital and the professionalization of start-up firms: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance57(1): 169–197.
45.
HochbergY. V.LindseyL. A.WesterfieldM. M. (2015) Resource accumulation through economic ties: Evidence from venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics118(2): 245–267.
46.
HochbergY. V.LjungqvistA.LuY. (2007) Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance62(1): 251–301.
47.
HsuD. H. (2004) What do entrepreneurs pay for venture capital affiliation?Journal of Finance59(4): 1805–1844.
48.
HsuD. H. (2007) Experienced entrepreneurial founders, organizational capital, and venture capital funding. Research Policy36: 722–741.
49.
HsuD. H.RobertsE. B.EesleyC. E. (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Research Policy36(5): 768–788.
50.
JensenM.RoyA. (2008) Staging exchange partner choices: When do status and reputation matter?Academy of Management Journal51(3): 495–516.
51.
JoshiA.RohH. (2009) The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal52(3): 599–627.
52.
KaplanS. N.SchoarA. (2005) Private equity performance: Returns, persistence, and capital flows. Journal of Finance60(4): 1791–1823.
53.
KatilaR.RosenbergerJ. D.EisenhardtK. M. (2008) Swimming with sharks: Technology ventures, defense mechanisms and corporate relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly53: 295–332.
54.
KingG.ZengL. (2001) Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis9: 137–163.
55.
KirilenkoA. A. (2001) Valuation and control in venture finance. The Journal of Finance56(2): 565–587.
56.
KrishnanR.MartinX.NoorderhavenN. G. (2006) When does trust matter to alliance performance?Academy of Management Journal49(5): 894–917.
57.
LafontaineF.ShawK. (2016) Serial entrepreneurship: Learning by doing?Journal of Labor Economics34(S2): S217–S254.
58.
LavieD.LechnerC.SinghH. (2007) The performance implications of timing of entry and involvement in multipartner alliances. Academy of Management Journal50(3): 578–604.
59.
LernerJ. (1994) The syndication of venture capital investments. Financial Management23(3): 16–27.
60.
LernerJ. (1995) Venture capitalists and the oversight of private firms. Journal of Finance50(1): 301–318.
61.
LiY. (2008) Duration analysis of venture capital staging: A real options perspective. Journal of Business Venturing23(5): 497–512.
62.
LiY.ChiT. (2013) Venture capitalists' decision to withdraw: The role of portfolio configuration from a real options lens. Strategic Management Journal34(11): 1351–1366.
63.
LincolnJ. R. (1984) Analyzing Relations in dyads: Problems, models, and an application to interorganizational research. Sociological Methods and Research13(1): 45–76.
64.
LockettA.WrightM. (2001) The syndication of venture capital investments. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science29: 375–390.
65.
MacmillanI. C.SiegelR.NarasimhaP. S. (1985) Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing1(1): 119–128.
66.
ManigartS.LockettA.MeulemanM.WrightM.LandströmH.BruiningH.DesbrièresP.HommelU. (2006) Venture capitalists' decision to syndicate. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice30(2): 131–153.
67.
ManigartS.WrightM.RobbieK.DesbrieresP.De WaeleK. (1997) Venture capitalists' appraisal of investment projects: An empirical european study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice21: 29–44.
68.
MegginsonW. L.WeissK. A. (1990) Venture capitalist certification in initial public offerings. Journal of Finance46(3): 879–903.
69.
MeulemanM.LockettA.ManigartS.WrightM. (2010) Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations: The paradox of relational embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies47(6): 995–1019.
70.
MoseyS.WrightM. (2007) From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice31(6): 909–935.
71.
OsnabruggeM. V.RobinsonR. J. (2000) Angel investing: Matching start-up funds with start-up companies, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
72.
OzmelU.ReuerJ. J.GulatiR. (2013) Signals across multiple networks: How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Academy of Management Journal56(3): 852–866.
73.
PaikY. (2014) Serial entrepreneurs and venture survival: Evidence from US venture-capital-financed semiconductor firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal8(3): 254–268.
74.
PodolnyJ. (1994) Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly39(3): 458–483.
75.
RowleyT. J. (1997) Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review22(4): 887–910.
76.
SahlmanW. A. (1990) The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics27(2): 473–521.
77.
SapienzaH. J. (1992) When do venture capitalists add value?Journal of Business Venturing7(1): 9–27.
78.
SapienzaH. J.KorsgaardM. A.ForbesD. (2003) The self-determination motive and entrepreneurs’ choice of financing. In: KatzJ. A.ShepherdD. A. (eds) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press, pp. 105–138.
79.
SapienzaH. J.ManigartS.VermeirW. (1996) Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing11(6): 439–469.
80.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review25(1): 217–226.
81.
ShinS. J.KimT.-Y.LeeJ.-Y.BianL. (2012) Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal55(1): 197–212.
82.
SimmelG. (1950) Individual and society. In: WolffK. H. (ed.) The sociology of Georg Simmel, New York, NY: Free Press.
83.
SimonsT.PelledL. H.SmithK. A. (1999) Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal42(6): 662–673.
84.
SorensonM. (2007) How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital. The Journal of Finance62(6): 2725–2762.
85.
SorensonO.StuartT. E. (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology106(6): 1546–1588.
86.
SorensonO.StuartT. E. (2008) Bringing the context back in: Settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks. Administrative Science Quarterly53(2): 266–294.
87.
StandaertT.ManigartS. (2017) Government as fund-of-fund and VC fund sponsors: Effect on employment in portfolio companies. Small Business Economics50(2): 357–373.
TrapidoD. (2007) Competitive embeddedness and the emergence of interfirm cooperation. Social Forces86(1): 165–191.
90.
VanackerT.ManigartS.MeulemanM. (2014) Path-dependent evolution versus intentional management of investment ties in science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38(3): 671–690.
91.
WassermanN. (2013) The founder's dilemmas: Anticipating and avoiding the pitfalls that can sink a startup, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
92.
WooldridgeJ. (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
93.
WrightM.RobbieK.EnnewC. (1997) Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing12(3): 227–249.
94.
YoshikawaT.PhanP. H.LintonJ. (2004) The relationship between governance structure and risk management approaches in Japanese venture capital firms. Journal of Business Venturing19(6): 831–849.
95.
ZengM.ChenX.-P. (2003) Achieving cooperation in multi-party alliances: A social dilemma approach to partnership management. Academy of Management Review28(4): 587–605.
96.
ZhangJ. (2011) The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: Evidence from serial entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics36: 187–208.
97.
ZhangJ.SouitarisV.SohP. H.WongP. K. (2008) A contingent model of network utilization in early financing of technology ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32(4): 593–613.
98.
ZhangL.GuptaA. K.HallenB. L. (2017) The conditional importance of prior ties: A group-level analysis of venture capital syndication. Academy of Management Journal60(4): 1–27.
99.
ZhelyazkovP. I. (2018). Interactions and interests: Collaboration outcomes, competitive concerns, and the limits to triadic closure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(1), 210–247.
