We utilize the exploration/exploitation framework to examine how a firm’s engagement in exploration influences its portfolio of external corporate venturing (ECV) activities. Three forms of equity-based ECV are considered: corporate venture capital investments, joint ventures, and acquisitions. The organizational learning literature is used to investigate how a firm’s engagement in exploration influences its usage of acquisitions relative to its overall portfolio of ECV activities. The investing firm’s industry technological dynamism is posited as a moderator of the relationship between exploration and the relative usage of acquisitions. Utilizing a sample of 1,326 firm-year observations between 1996 and 2008, we find that exploration is positively related to the relative usage of acquisitions, though this relationship is moderated by the investing firm’s industry technological dynamism.
AhujaG.KatilaR.2001. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 197-220.
2.
AudretschD. B.FeldmanM. P.1996. R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86: 630-640.
3.
BalakrishnanS.KozaM. P.1993. Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 20: 99-117.
BasuS.PhelpsC.KothaS.2011. Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, 26: 153-171.
6.
BasuS.WadhwaA.2013. External venturing generate discontinuous strategic renewal: An options perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30: 956-975.
7.
BensonD.ZiedonisR.2009. Corporate venture capital as a window on new technologies: Implications for the performance of corporate investors when acquiring startups. Organization Science, 20: 329-351.
8.
BierlyP. E.DamanpourF.SantoroM. D.2009. The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 481-509.
9.
BowmanE.1984. Content analysis of annual reports for corporate strategy and risk. Interfaces, 14: 61-71.
10.
BradleyS. W.AldrichH.ShepherdD. A.WiklundJ.2010. Resources, environmental change, and survival: Asymmetric paths of young independent and subsidiary organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 486-509.
11.
BrantR.1990. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics, 46: 1171-1178.
12.
CertoS. T.SemadeniM.2006. Strategy research and panel data: Evidence and implications. Journal of Management, 32: 449.
13.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S.2003. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd ed.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
CovinJ. G.MilesM. P.2007. Strategic use of corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31: 183-207.
15.
CuiA. S.KumarM.2012. Termination of related and unrelated joint ventures: A contingency approach. Journal of Business Research, 65: 1202-1208.
16.
DanneelsE.SethiR.2011. New product exploration under environmental turbulence. Organization Science, 22: 1026-1039.
17.
Dunlap-HinklerD.KotabeM.MudambiR.2010. A story of breakthrough versus incremental innovation: Corporate entrepreneurship in the global pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 106-127.
18.
DuriauV.RegerR.PfarrerM.2007. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10: 5-34.
19.
DushnitskyG.LavieD.2010. How alliance formation shapes corporate venture capital investment in the software industry: A resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4: 22-48.
20.
DushnitskyG.LenoxM.2005a. When do firms undertake R&D by investing in new ventures?Strategic Management Journal, 26: 947-965.
21.
DushnitskyG.LenoxM. J.2005b. When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures? Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34: 615-639.
22.
EstradaI.delaFuenteG.Martín-CruzN.2010. Technological joint venture formation under the real options approach. Research Policy, 39: 1185-1197.
23.
FoltaT. B.1998. Governance and uncertainty: The tradeoff between administrative control and commitment. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1007-1028.
24.
FossN. J.LyngsieJ.ZahraS. A.2013. The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 1453-1471.
25.
GompersP.2002. Corporations and the financing of innovation: The corporate venturing experience. Economic Review–Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 87: 1-18.
26.
GrantR.1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109-122.
27.
GuptaA. K.SmithK. G.ShalleyC. E.2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 693-706.
28.
HeZ.WongP.2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15: 481-494.
29.
HeckmanJ. J.1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47: 153-161.
30.
HillS. A.BirkinshawJ.2014. Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units. Journal of Management, 40: 1899-1931.
31.
HuberG.1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2: 88-115.
32.
InkpenA. C.2000. Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management Studies, 37: 1019-1044.
33.
KangM. P.MahoneyJ. T.TanD.2009. Why firms make unilateral investments specific to other firms: The case of OEM suppliers. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 117-135.
34.
KatilaR.AhujaG.2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 1183-1194.
35.
KeatsB.HittM.1988. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31: 570-598.
36.
KeilT.2004. Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41: 799-825.
37.
KeilT.AutioE.GeorgeG.2008. Corporate venture capital, disembodied experimentation and capability development. Journal of Management Studies, 45: 1475-1505.
38.
KeilT.MaulaM.SchildtH.ZahraS.2008. The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 895-907.
39.
KogutB.ZanderU.1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
40.
KozaM. P.LewinA. Y.1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9: 255-264.
41.
LeibleinM. J.MillerD. J.2003. An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 24: 839-859.
42.
LeibleinM. J.ReuerJ. J.DalsaceF.2002. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 817-833.
43.
LevinthalD.MarchJ.1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 2: 307-333.
44.
LevinthalD.MarchJ.1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95-112.
45.
MarchJ.1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
46.
MaulaM.KeilT.ZahraS.2013. Top management’s attention to discontinuous technological change: Corporate venture capital as an alert mechanism. Organization Science, 24: 926-947.
47.
MillerD.1979. Strategy, structure and environment: Context influences upon some bivariate associations. Journal of Management Studies, 16: 294-316.
48.
MorrisR.1994. Computerized content analysis in management research: A demonstration of advantages & limitations. Journal of Management, 20: 903-931.
NeuD.WarsameH.PedwellK.1998. Managing public impressions: Environmental disclosures in annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23: 265-282.
51.
PalichL. E.CardinalL. B.MillerC. C.2000. Curvilinearity in the diversification-performance linkage: An examination of over three decades of research. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 155-174.
52.
PheneA.TallmanS.AlmeidaP.2012. When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation?Journal of Management, 38: 753-783.
53.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J.2006. Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31: 437-448.
54.
RosenkopfL.NerkarA.2001. Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 287-306.
55.
SahaymA.SteensmaH.BardenJ.2010. The influence of R&D investment on the use of corporate venture capital: An industry-level analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 25: 376-388.
56.
SampsonR. C.2007. R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50: 364-386.
57.
SantoroM.McGillJ.2005. The effect of uncertainty and asset co-specialization on governance in biotechnology alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 1261-1269.
58.
SchildtH.MaulaM.KeilT.2005. Explorative and exploitative learning from external corporate ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29: 493-515.
59.
ShortJ.PalmerT.2008. The application of DICTION to content analysis research in strategic management. Organizational Research Methods, 11: 727.
60.
SiggelkowN.LevinthalD.2003. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science, 14: 650-669.
61.
SubramanianR.InsleyR. G.BlackwellR. D.1993. Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30: 49-61.
62.
TongT.LiY.2011. Real options and investment mode: Evidence from corporate venture capital and acquisition. Organization Science, 22: 659-674.
63.
UotilaJ.MaulaM.KeilT.ZahraS.2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 221-231.
64.
VagnaniG.2015. Exploration and long-run organizational performance: The moderating role of technological interdependence. Journal of Management, 41: 1651-1676.
65.
van de VrandeV.2013. Balancing your technology-sourcing portfolio: How sourcing mode diversity enhances innovative performance. Strategic Management Journal, 34: 610-621.
66.
van de VrandeV.VanhaverbekeW.2013. How prior corporate venture capital investments shape technological alliances: A real options approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37: 1019-1043.
67.
van de VrandeV.VanhaverbekeW.DuystersG.2009. External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 62-80.
68.
van de VrandeV.VanhaverbekeW.DuystersG.2011. Technology in-sourcing and the creation of pioneering technologies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28: 974-987.
69.
WadhwaA.BasuS.2013. Exploration and resource commitments in unequal partnerships: An examination of corporate venture capital investments. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30: 916-936.
70.
WadhwaA.KothaS.2006. Knowledge creation through external venturing: Evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 819-835.
71.
WangH.LiJ.2008. Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34: 925-951.
72.
WeberL.MayerK.2014. Transaction cost economics and the cognitive perspective: Investigating the sources and governance of interpretive uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 39: 344-363.
73.
WilliamsonO.1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
74.
WintersT.MurfinD.1988. Venture capital investing for corporate development objectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 3: 207-222.
75.
WisemanR. M.2009. On the use and misuse of ratios in strategic management research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 5: 75-110.
76.
WolfeR.GouldW.1998. An approximate likelihood-ratio test for ordinal response models. Stata Technical Bulletin, 7: 24-27.
77.
WooldridgeJ. M.2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, 2nd ed.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78.
WuS.LevitasE.PriemR. L.2005. CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 859-873.
79.
Yli RenkoH.AutioE.SapienzaH. J.2001. Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 587-613.
