We refine the findings of Vardaman, Allen, and Rogers that indicate the structural position of nonfamily employees in friendship networks can enhance organizational identification and reduce turnover in family firms. We extend their work by offering a more nuanced perspective that not all friendships are created equal. We propose that a family friend’s membership in the family in-group or out-group influences nonfamily employees’ organizational identification, and in turn, their behavior (i.e., organizational citizenship behavior and deviance). Our theorizing expands the nascent literature on nonfamily employees, offering a theoretical rationale for their complex and often poorly understood behavior.
ArregleJ.HittM. A.SirmonD. G.VeryP. (2007) The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies44(1): 73–95.
2.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
3.
BarnettT.KellermannsF. W. (2006) Are we family and are we treated as family? Nonfamily employees’ perceptions of justice in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30(6): 837–854.
4.
BeckerT. E.BennettR. J. (2007) Employee attachment and deviance in organizations. In: Langam-FoxJ.CooperC. L.KlimoskiR. J. (eds) Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace: Management challenges and symptoms, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 136–148.
5.
BennettR. J.RobinsonS. L. (2000) Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology85(3): 349–360.
6.
BernhardF.O’DriscollM. P. (2011) Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees’ work attitudes and behaviors. Group & Organization Management36(3): 345–384.
7.
BorgattiS. P.HalginD. S. (2011) On network theory. Organization Science22(5): 1168–1181.
8.
ChrismanJ. J.ChuaJ. H.PearsonA. W.BarnettT. (2012) Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(2): 267–293.
9.
CropanzanoR.MitchellM. S. (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management31(6): 874–900.
10.
DansereauF.GraenG.HagaW. J. (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance13(1): 46–78.
11.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly39(2): 239–263.
12.
EddlestonK. A.KidwellR. E. (2012) Parent-child relationships: Planting the seeds of deviant behavior in the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(2): 369–386.
13.
Gilbert, E., & Karahalios, K. (2009, April 4–9). Predicting tie strength with social media (pp. 211–220). In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA), CHI ‘09. ACM, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518736.
14.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
15.
GranovetterM. S. (1982) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In: MarsdenP. V.LinN. (eds) Social structure and network analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 105–130.
16.
HaynieD. L.DooganN. J.SollerB. (2014) Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology: An Interdisciplinary Journal52(4): 688–722.
17.
HoggM. A.TerryD. I. (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25(1): 121–140.
18.
HuangG.WellmanN.AshfordS. J.LeeC.WangL. (2017) Deviance and exit: The organizational costs of job insecurity and moral disengagement. Journal of Applied Psychology102(1): 26–42.
19.
IliesR.NahrgangJ. D.MorgesonF. P. (2007) Leader-member exchange and citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology92(1): 269–277.
20.
LidenR. C.SparroweR. T.WayneS. J. (1997) Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. In: FerrisG. R. (ed.) Research in personnel and human resources managementVol 15, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 47–119.
21.
MadisonK.KellermannsF. W. (2013) Is the spiritual bond bound by blood? An exploratory study of spiritual leadership in family firms. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion10(2): 159–182.
22.
MillerD.Le Breton-MillerI. (2005) Management insights from great and struggling family businesses. Long Range Planning38(6): 517–530.
23.
MobergD. J. (2000) Role models and moral exemplars: How do employees acquire virtues by observing others?Business Ethics Quarterly10(3): 675–696.
24.
NormanS. M.AveyJ. B.NimnichtJ. L.PigeonG. N. (2010) The interactive effects of psychological capital and organizational identity on employee organizational citizenship and deviance behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies17(4): 380–391.
25.
OrganD. W. (1988) Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26.
PodsakoffN. P.WhitingS. W.PodsakoffP. M.BlumeB. D. (2009) Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology94(1): 122–141.
27.
RikettaM. (2005) Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior66(2): 358–384.
28.
SakuraiK.JexS. M. (2012) Coworker incivility and incivility targets’ work effort and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating role of supervisor social support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology17(2): 150–161.
29.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinW.WorchelS. (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 33–48.
30.
TurnerJ. C. (1975) Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology5(1): 1–34.
31.
VaderaA. K.PrattM. G. (2013) Love, hate, ambivalence, or indifference? A conceptual examination of workplace crimes and organizational identification. Organization Science24(1): 172–188.
32.
van KnippenbergD. (2000) Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review49(3): 357–371.
33.
Vardaman, J., Allen, D., & Rogers, B. L. (2018). We are friends but are we family? Organizational identification and nonfamily employee turnover. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 290–309.
34.
VerbekeA.KanoL. (2012) The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36(6): 1183–1205.
35.
XuE.HuangX.LamC.MiaoQ. (2012) Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior33(4): 531–543.
36.
ZellwegerT. M.EddlestonK. A.KellermannsF. W. (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy1(1): 54–63.
