Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-11
A Dynamic Model of Entrepreneurial Uncertainty and Business Opportunity Identification: Exploration as a Mediator and Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy as a Moderator
This study focuses on the identification of business opportunities when entrepreneurs’ perceived level of environmental uncertainty changes. We suggest that within persons, exploration mediates this relationship and entrepreneurial self-efficacy moderates whether entrepreneurs explore more or less with increasing uncertainty. To test our moderated mediation model we conducted a monthly field study with 121 early-stage entrepreneurs. Multilevel regression analyses reveal that an increase in the level of perceived uncertainty within entrepreneurs predicted the identification of opportunities through exploration for entrepreneurs high in self-efficacy, but not for those low in self-efficacy. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy acts as a personal resource that helps entrepreneurs to transform increasing perceptions of uncertainty into exploration and opportunity identification.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.CulpepperS. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490–1528.
2.
ArdichviliA.CardozoR.RayS. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 105–123.
3.
BaasM.de DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 794–809.
4.
BakkerA. B.HakanenJ. J.DemeroutiE.XanthopoulouD. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly, when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274–284. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274.
5.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
7.
BaronR. A. (2008). The role of affect in the entrepreneurial process. Academy of Management Review, 33, 328–340.
8.
BaumJ. R.LockeE. A. (2004). The relationship of entrepreneurial traits, skill, and motivation to subsequent venture growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 587–598.
9.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.DeWallC. N.ZhangL. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203.
10.
BehrensJ.ErnstH.ShepherdD. A. (2014). The decision to exploit an R&D project: Divergent thinking across middle and senior managers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 144–158.
11.
BledowR. (2013). Demand-perception and self-motivation as opponent processes: A response to Bandura and Vancouver. Journal of Management, 39, 14–26.
12.
BoydN. G.VozikisG. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 63–77.
13.
BrinckmannJ.GrichnikD.KapsaD. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 24–40.
14.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
BulloughA.RenkoM.MyattT. (2014). Danger zone entrepreneurs: The importance of resilience and self-efficacy for entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 473–499.
16.
ButlerJ. E.DoktorR.LinsF. A. (2010). Linking international entrepreneurship to uncertainty, opportunity discovery, and cognition. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 8, 121–134.
17.
CarverC. S. (2004). Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system. Emotion, 4, 3–22.
18.
CervoneD.KoppD. A.SchaumannL.ScottW. D. (1994). Mood, self-efficacy, and performance standards: Lower moods induce higher standards for performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 499–512.
19.
ChenJ.ReillyR. R.LynnG. S. (2005). The impacts of speed-to-market on new product success: The moderating effects of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52, 199–212.
20.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Quantitative scales, curvilinear relationships, and transformations. In: CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (eds) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 193–254.
21.
DrnovšekM.WincentJ.CardonM. S. (2010). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and business start-up: Developing a multi-dimensional definition. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16, 329–348.
22.
DuncanR. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313–327.
23.
EckhardtJ. T.ShaneS. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 333–349.
24.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
25.
EngelY.DimitrovaN. G.KhapovaS. N.ElfringT. (2014). Uncertain but able: Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and novices’ use of expert decision-logic under uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 1, 12–17.
26.
FergusonC. J. (2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 532–538.
27.
FisherG. G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1019–1051.
28.
FreseM. (2009). Toward a psychology of entrepreneurship—An action theory perspective. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 5, 435–494.
29.
GeldhofG. J.PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J. (2014). Reliability estimation in a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis framework. Psychological Methods, 19, 72–91.
30.
GielnikM. M.FreseM.GrafJ. M.KampschulteA. (2012). Creativity in the opportunity identification process and the moderating effect of diversity of information. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 559–576.
31.
GielnikM. M.FreseM.Kahara-KawukiA.KatonoI. W.KyejjusaS.NgomaM.DlugoschT. J. (2015). Action and action-regulation in entrepreneurship: Evaluating a student training for promoting entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14, 69–94.
32.
GielnikM. M.KrämerA.-C.KappelB.FreseM. (2014). Antecedents of business opportunity identification and innovation: Investigating the interplay of information processing and information acquisition. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 63, 344–381.
33.
Gonzalez-Uribe, J., & Leatherbee, M. (2017). The effects of business accelerators on new venture performance: Evidence from Start-Up Chile. Review of Financial Studies, Forthcoming.
34.
GrantA. M.AshfordS. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3–34.
35.
GriffinM. A.ParkerS. K.NealA. (2008). Is behavioral engagement a distinct and useful construct. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 48–51.
36.
GruberM.MacMillanI. C.ThompsonJ. D. (2008). Look before you leap: Market opportunity identification in emerging technology firms. Management Science, 54, 1652–1665.
37.
GuptaA. K.SmithK. G.ShalleyC. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.
38.
HarperD. A. (2008). Towards a theory of entrepreneurial teams. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 613–626.
39.
HeckmanJ. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352.
40.
HirshJ. B.MarR. A.PetersonJ. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: A framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychological Review, 119, 304–320.
41.
HmieleskiK. M.BaronR. A. (2008). When does entrepreneurial self-efficacy enhance versus reduce firm performance?Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 57–72.
42.
HmieleskiK. M.CorbettA. C. (2008). The contrasting interaction effects of improvisational behavior with entrepreneurial self-efficacy on new venture performance and entrepreneur work satisfaction. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 482–496.
JexS. M.BlieseP. D.BuzzellS.PrimeauJ. (2001). The impact of self-efficacy on stressor–strain relations: Coping style as an explanatory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 401–409.
45.
JohnsonR. E.LanajK.BarnesC. M. (2014). The good and bad of being fair: Effects of procedural and interpersonal justice behaviors on regulatory resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 635–650. doi:10.1037/a0035647.
46.
KuhlJ. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Interactions of psychological systems], Göttingen: Hogrefe.
47.
LaHuisD. M.HartmanM. J.HakoyamaS.ClarkP. C. (2014). Explained variance measures for multilevel models. Organizational Research Methods, 17, 433–451.
48.
Laureiro-MartínezD.BrusoniS.ZolloM. (2010). The neuroscientific foundations of the exploration−exploitation dilemma. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3, 95–115.
49.
Leatherbee, M., & Eesley, C. E. (2014). Boulevard of broken behaviors: Socio-psychological mechanisms of entrepreneurship policies. Retrieved from SSRN website: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2488712.
50.
Leatherbee, M., & Katila, R. (2017). Stay the course or pivot? Antecedents of cognitive refinements of business models in young firms. Retrieved from SSRN website: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2902869.
51.
LiaoJ.GartnerW. B. (2006). The effects of pre-venture plan timing and perceived environmental uncertainty on the persistence of emerging firms. Small Business Economics, 27, 23–40.
52.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.
53.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405–416.
54.
MarchJ. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
55.
MarkmanG. D.BaronR. A.BalkinD. B. (2005). Are perseverance and self-efficacy costless? Assessing entrepreneurs’ regretful thinking. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 1–19.
56.
MatthewsC. H.ScottS. G. (1995). Uncertainty and planning in small and entrepreneurial firms: An empirical assessment. Journal of Small Business Management, 33, 34–52.
57.
McKelvieA.HaynieJ. M.GustavssonV. (2011). Unpacking the uncertainty construct: Implications for entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 273–292.
58.
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132–152.
59.
MillikenF. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12, 133–143.
60.
MomT. J. M.Van Den BoschF. A. J.VolberdaH. W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 910–931.
61.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
OzgenE.BaronR. A. (2007). Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: Effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 174–192.
64.
PeidroD.MulaJ.JiménezM.del Mar BotellaM. (2010). A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 205, 65–80.
65.
PerrewéP. L.ZellarsK. L. (1999). An examination of attributions and emotions in the transactional approach to the organizational stress process. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 739–752.
66.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
67.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
68.
RamoglouS.TsangE. (2016). A realist perspective of entrepreneurship: Opportunities as propensities. Academy of Management Review, 41, 410–434.
69.
RosnowR. L.RosenthalR. (2003). Effect sizes for experimenting psychologists. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 57(3): 221–237.
70.
RossiterJ. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19, 305–335.
71.
SarasonY.DeanT.DillardJ. F. (2006). Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: A structuration view. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 286–305.
72.
SarasvathyS. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.
73.
SchumpeterJ. A. (1934). The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
ShaneS.VenkataramanS. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.
75.
SiemsenE.RothA.OliveiraP. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 456–476.
76.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, London: Sage.
77.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
SongM.Montoya-WeissM. M. (2001). The effect of perceived technological uncertainty on Japanese new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 61–80.
79.
SonnentagS.ArbeusH.MahnC.FritzC. (2014). Exhaustion and lack of psychological detachment from work during off-job time: Moderator effects of time pressure and leisure experiences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 206–216.
80.
TangJ. (2008). Environmental munificence for entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurial alertness and commitment. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 14, 128–151.
81.
TangJ.KacmarK. M.BusenitzL. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 77–94.
82.
TownsendD. M.BusenitzL. W.ArthursJ. D. (2010). To start or not to start: Outcome and ability expectations in the decision to start a new venture. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 192–202.
83.
TumasjanA.BraunR. (2012). In the eye of the beholder: How regulatory focus and self-efficacy interact in influencing opportunity recognition. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 622–636.
84.
UcbasaranD.WestheadP.WrightM. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: Does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter?Small Business Economics, 30, 153–173.
85.
UyM. A.FooM. D.AguinisH. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 31–54.
86.
VaghelyI. P.JulienP.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed? An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 73–86.
87.
van GelderenM.FreseM.ThurikR. (2000). Strategies, uncertainty and performance of small business startups. Small Business Economics, 15, 165–181.
88.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247–252.
89.
WatsonD.WieseD.VaidyaJ.TellegenA. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.
90.
ZhangS. X.CuetoJ. (2017). The study of bias in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 419–454.
91.
ZhaoH.SeibertS. E.HillsG. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1265–1272.
