Abstract
Objectives
This study sought to review implementation of a tool designed to standardise emergency assessments of psychiatric patients. Primary objectives were to reduce stay times and increase evidence-based work-up. Secondary objectives were to review triages and analyse confidence.
Methods
A closed loop audit cycle was performed to determine the difference between assessments prior to and after implementation of the tool. A baseline audit was followed by 2 month’s implementation. Emergency staff were then instructed to utilise the tool for psychiatric presentations and complete surveys. A Student’s t-test and two Chi-squared tests were conducted to examine stay time; evidence-based care; and triage, respectively.
Results
For pre-implementation, 355 participants were included with 333 for post-implementation. Stay time decreased by over 10% (p = .067) whilst participants receiving recommended work-up increased by almost 15% (p < .0001). The post-implementation period showed a decrease in triage ≥4 by almost 10% (p = .0004). The survey was unable to be assessed.
Conclusion
The substantial reductions in stay time and triage ≥4, coupled with the increase in appropriate work-up are promising findings. These indicate implementation of a tool designed to standardise emergency assessment of psychiatric patients will reduce care disparity between psychiatric and medical presentations. Further studies are needed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.