The psychological impact of supervised quarantine facilities for the mitigation of COVID-19: A systematic review

Abstract

Background

Government mandated quarantine outside the home was implemented to mitigate COVID-19 in some countries. Individual studies report that this can result in psychological distress. Investigating levels of distress and associated risk factors across different settings would inform public health models of care during future pandemics. However, no previous systematic reviews have been conducted on the topic. Therefore, we systematically reviewed international research on the prevalence and risk factors of psychological distress within supervised quarantine facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using Medline, Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, Psych Info, Cochrane databases and Google Scholar from January 2020 until June 2023. Relevant quantitative studies published in English were included.

Results

13 studies (pooled participants n = 4366) were included in this review. The prevalence of psychological distress varied widely across the included studies (depression 4%–63%; anxiety 4%–100%; stress 1%–68%). Associated risk factors identified were also heterogeneous between studies and facilities.

Conclusion

In future pandemics, the benefits of infection mitigation need to be weighed against the risk of psychological distress. Models of care utilising specifically designed facilities, with greater freedoms, increased comfort and ease of access to mental health services may limit psychological distress.