We describe a research program to advance youth mental health service research in Australia, addressing two core knowledge gaps: the lack of available routine outcome measures and lack of understanding of how to assess and monitor complexity and heterogeneity in illness presentation and trajectory.
Conclusions
Our research identifies better routine outcome measures (ROM) that are: designed specifically for the developmental nuances of the 12–25-year age range; multidimensional; and meaningful to young people, their carers, and service providers. Alongside much-needed new measures of complexity and heterogeneity, these tools will inform service providers to better meet the needs of young people presenting with mental health problems.
SolmiMRaduaJOlivolaM, et al.Age at onset of mental disorders worldwide: large-scale meta-analysis of 192 epidemiological studies. Mol Psychiatry2022; 27: 281–295. DOI: 10.1038/s41380-021-01161-7
5.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian burden of disease study: impact and causes of illness and death in Australia 2011. Australian Burden of Disease Study series no. 3. BOD 4. Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
6.
GibbSJFergussonDMHorwoodLJ. Burden of psychiatric disorder in young adulthood and life outcomes at age 30. The British Journal of Psychiatry2010; 197: 122–127.
7.
LiSHBeamesJRNewbyJM, et al.The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01790-x
8.
McGorryP. Mental health and COVID-19: are we really all in this together?Med J Aust2020; 213: 454–455.
9.
McGorryPDMeiC. Early intervention in youth mental health: progress and future directions. Evid Based Ment Health2018; 21: 182–184. DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2018-300060.
10.
SawyerMGReeceCESawyerAC, et al.Adequacy of treatment for child and adolescent mental disorders in Australia: a national study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2019; 53: 326–335.
11.
State of Victoria. Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System, Final Report, Summary and recommendations Parl Paper No. 202, Session 2018–21 (document 1 of 6). Melbourne Victoria, 2021.
12.
Australian Government. Productivity commission 2020, mental health. Canberra. 2020.
13.
RickwoodDParaskakisMQuinD, et al.Australia’s innovation in youth mental health care: the headspace centre model. Early Interv Psychiatry2019; 13: 159–166. DOI: 10.1111/eip.12740.
14.
RickwoodDMcEachranJSawA, et al.Sixteen years of innovation in youth mental healthcare in Australia: Outcomes for young people attending headspace centre services. medRxiv2022; 24: 22279102. DOI: 10.1101/2022.08.24.22279102
15.
FiliaKRickwoodDMenssinkJ, et al.Clinical and functional characteristics of a subsample of young people presenting for primary mental healthcare at headspace services across Australia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2021; 56: 1311–1323. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-02020-6.
16.
KwanBRickwoodDJ. A systematic review of mental health outcome measures for young people aged 12 to 25 years. BMC Psychiatry2015; 15: 279–2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-015-0664-x.
17.
CottonSMMenssinkJFiliaK, et al.The psychometric characteristics of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in help-seeking youth: What do you miss when using it as an outcome measure?Psychiatry Res2021; 305: 114182. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114182.
18.
PirkisJBurgessPCoombsT, et al.Routine measurement of outcomes in Australia’s public sector mental health services. Aust New Zealand Health Policy2005; 2: 8. DOI: 10.1186/1743-8462-2-8
19.
HamiltonCFiliaKLloydS, et al.More than just numbers on a page?’ A qualitative exploration of the use of data collection and feedback in youth mental health services. PLoS One2022; 17: e0271023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271023.
20.
GardnerACottonSO’DonoghueB, et al.Preliminary psychometric properties of a measure of social inclusion for young adults aged 18 to 25 with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Rehabil J2020; 43: 156–169. DOI: 10.1037/prj0000382.
21.
FiliaKGaoCXJacksonHJ, et al.Psychometric properties of a brief, self-report measure of social inclusion: the F-SIM16. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci2022; 31: e8. DOI: 10.1017/s2045796021000755
22.
AllottKGaoCXFisherC, et al.The neuropsychological symptoms self-report: psychometric properties in an adolescent and young adult mental health cohort. Child Adolesc Ment Health2021. DOI: 10.1111/camh.12473.
23.
HetrickSEGaoCXFiliaKM, et al.Validation of a brief tool to assess and monitor suicidal ideation: The Youth Suicide Ideation Screen (YSIS-3). J Affect Disord2021; 295: 235–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.053
24.
KwanBRickwoodDJTelfordNR. Development and validation of MyLifeTracker: a routine outcome measure for youth mental health. Psychol Res Behav Manag2018; 11: 67–77. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S152342
25.
RickwoodDJTelfordNRMazzerKR, et al.The services provided to young people through the headspace centres across Australia. Med J Aust2015; 202: 533–536.
26.
RickwoodDJTelfordNRParkerAG, et al.headspace - Australia’s innovation in youth mental health: who are the clients and why are they presenting. Med J Aust2014; 200: 108–111.
27.
Evaluation KPMG. Of the national headspace program. Final report. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care, 2022.
28.
CottonSMHamiltonMPFiliaK, et al.Heterogeneity of quality of life in young people attending primary mental health services. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci2022; 31: e55. DOI: 10.1017/s2045796022000427
29.
FiliaKMenssinkJGaoCX, et al.Social inclusion, intersectionality, and profiles of vulnerable groups of young people seeking mental health support. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2022; 57: 245–254. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02123-8
