Abstract
Objective
This cross-sectional survey aimed to establish the views and intentions of New Zealand (NZ) psychiatrists regarding their role as competence assessors in the NZ End of Life Choice Act (‘Act’). Some questions were replicated from a pre-existing Ministry of Health workforce survey regarding the Act, for comparative analysis between psychiatrists and other health professionals.
Methods
The survey was disseminated via email to all NZ psychiatrists registered with the Royal Australia and NZ College of Psychiatry and promoted by snowballing methods to reach non-members.
Results
There were similar (moderate) levels of understanding of the Act, compared to other health professionals. Psychiatrists show similar levels of support for assisted dying as other health professionals (55% and 47%, respectively), however psychiatrists are significantly less likely to be willing to provide assisted dying services than other health professionals. Concerns were raised regarding the challenges faced by psychiatrists and need for more clarity around the psychiatrist’s role.
Conclusions
Few NZ psychiatrists were willing to be involved with the Act. There was a perceived lack of information around a psychiatrist’s role, responsibilities and legal protections. Further guidance is needed regarding the concept of capacity in assisted dying and the factors that challenge these assessments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
