Between SET and ASP: balancing the scales of student evaluation of teaching (SET) and teachers’ assessments of student performance (ASP) for medical school education in psychiatry
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2018
Between SET and ASP: balancing the scales of student evaluation of teaching (SET) and teachers’ assessments of student performance (ASP) for medical school education in psychiatry
We explore the relative roles of student evaluation of teaching (SET) and teachers’ assessment of student performance (ASP) in medical school education in psychiatry.
Conclusions:
We conclude that SET and ASP need to be better researched as outcome measures, and input from both processes needs to be balanced in evaluating psychiatric medical education.
KatschnigH. Are psychiatrists an endangered species? Observations on internal and external challenges to the profession. World Psychiatry2010; 9: 21–28.
2.
KoganJRSheaJA. Course evaluation in medical education. Teach Teach Educ2007; 23: 251–264.
3.
SpoorenPBrockxBMortelmansD. On the validity of student evaluation of teaching. Rev Educ Res2013; 83: 598–642.
4.
SchiekirkaSFeufelMAHerrmann-LingenCet al. Evaluation in medical education: a topical review of target parameters, data collection tools and confounding factors. Ger Med Sci2015; 13: 1–19.
5.
UijtdehaageSO’NealC. A curious case of the phantom professor: mindless teaching evaluations by medical students. Med Educ2015; 49: 928–932.
6.
De WaalHMalikABhugraD. The psychiatric profession: an expertise under siege?Int J Social Psychiatry2009; 56: 647–656.
7.
EpsteinRMStreetRL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med2011; 9: 100–103.
8.
LemmpHSealeC. The hidden curriculum in undergraduate medical education: qualitative study of medical students’ perceptions of teaching. BMJ2004; 329: 770–773.
9.
HodgesBRegehrGMartinD. Difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Acad Med2001; 76: S87–S89.
10.
SaxD. The revenge of analog: real things and why they matter. New York: Public Affairs, 2016.
11.
LooiJCLYongC-S. The doctor as an expert: apprentice, journeyman or master. Med J Austr2017; 207: 143–144.
12.
SchuwirthLWTVan der VleutenCPM. Programmatic assessment: from assessment of learning to assessment for learning. Med Teach2011; 33: 478–485.
13.
HodgesB. Assessment in the post-psychometric era: learning to love the subjective and collective. Med Teach2013; 35: 564–568.
