The present study examined the Italian version of the Work as Meaning Inventory and Work as Meaning Inventory for University students through a network perspective. Network analysis was applied to 505 Italian workers assessed via the Work as Meaning Inventory and 214 Italian university students assessed via the Work as Meaning Inventory for University students. The comparison between the factor and network model of both Work as Meaning Inventory and Work as Meaning Inventory for University students showed a higher fit for network models. Network analysis revealed that both Work as Meaning Inventory and Work as Meaning Inventory for University students items enclosed in the Positive meaning dimension had the highest centrality; the most connected item with the overall network was the item 2 (work/study that contributes to personal growth) able to link together the three dimensions (positive meaning, meaning-making through work, greater good motivations). Findings suggested that a network approach can provide a promising realm to expand the understanding of meaning at work and meaning at study.
AkinA.HamedogluM. A.KayaÇSarıçamH. (2013). Turkish version of the work as meaning inventory (WAMI): Validity and reliability study. Journal of European Education, 3(2), 11–16. Available at:http://www.eu-journal.org/index.php/JEE/article/view/194
2.
Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., & Duffy, R. D. (2014). Examining social class and work meaning within the psychology of working framework. Journal of Career Assessment, 22(4), 543–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072713514811
3.
AllanB. A.AutinK. L.DuffyR. D. (2016a). Self-determination and meaningful work: Exploring socioeconomic constraints. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00071
4.
AllanB.AutinK.DuffyR.SterlingH. (2020). Decent and meaningful work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(6), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000432
5.
Allan, B. A., Autin, K. L., Duffy, R. D., & Sterling, H. M. (2020). Decent and meaningful work: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(6), 669–679. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000432
6.
AllanB. A.Batz-BarbarichC.SterlingH. M.TayL. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406
7.
AllanB. A.DexterC.KinseyR.ParkerS. (2018a). Meaningful work and mental health: Job satisfaction as a moderator. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 27(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2016.1244718
8.
AllanB. A.DouglassR. P.DuffyR. D.McCartyR. J. (2016b). Meaningful work as a moderator of the relation between work stress and meaning in life. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599357
9.
AllanB. A.DuffyR. D.CollissonB. (2018b). Helping others increases meaningful work: Evidence from three experiments. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000228
10.
Allan, B. A., Duffy, R. D., & Douglass, R. (2015). Meaning in life and work: A developmental perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.950180
11.
AllanB. A.OwensR. L.DuffyR. D. (2017). Generation me or meaning? Exploring meaningful work in college students and career counselors. Journal of Career Development, 44(6), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316667599
12.
ArnoldK. A.WalshM. M. (2015). Customer incivility and employee well-being: Testing the moderating effects of meaning, perspective taking and transformational leadership. Work & Stress, 29(4), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1075234
13.
Arnoux-NicolasC.SovetL.LhotellierL.BernaudJ.-L. (2017). Development and validation of the meaning of work inventory among French workers. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 17(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-016-9323-0
14.
Arnoux-Nicolas, C., Sovet, L., Lhotellier, L., Di Fabio, A., & Bernaud, J.-L. (2016). Perceived work conditions and turnover intentions: The mediating role of meaning of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00704
15.
AutinK. L.HerdtM. E.GarciaR. G.EzemaG. N. (2021). Basic psychological need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, and meaningful work: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211018647
16.
BaileyC.YeomanR.MaddenA.ThompsonM.KerridgeG. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318804653
17.
BeckE. D.JacksonJ. J. (2021). Chapter 14—network approaches to representing and understanding personality dynamics. In WoodD.ReadS. J.HarmsP. D.SlaughterA. (Eds.), Measuring and modeling persons and situations (pp. 465–497). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819200-9.00003-X
18.
BlusteinD. L. (2006). The psychology of working: A new perspective for counseling, career development, and public policy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
BlusteinD. L.KennyM. E.Di FabioA.GuichardJ. (2019b). Expanding the impact of the psychology of working: Engaging psychology in the struggle for decent work and human rights. Journal of Career Assessment, 27(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072718774002
BorsboomD.CramerA. O. J. (2013). Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
22.
BrigantiG.LinkowskiP. (2019). Item and domain network structures of the resilience scale for adults in 675 university students. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, e33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796019000222
23.
BrigantiG.KempenaersC.BraunS.FriedE. I.LinkowskiP. (2018). Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry Research, 265, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082
24.
BurgerJ.IsvoranuA.-M.LunanskyG.HaslbeckJ. M. B.EpskampS.HoekstraR. H. A.FriedE. I.BorsboomD.BlankenT. F. (2022). Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. Psychological Methods, Advance online publicationhttps://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471
25.
CartwrightS.CooperC.L. (2014). Towards organizational health: Stress, positive organizational behavior, and employee well-being. In Bridging Occupational, Organizational and Public Health: A Transdisciplinary Approach (Vol. 9789400756403, pp. 29–42). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5640-3_3
26.
CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.van der MaasH. L. J.BorsboomD. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09991567
27.
Csordás, G., Matuszka, B., Sallay, V., & Martos, T. (2022). Assessing meaningful work among Hungarian employees: Testing psychometric properties of work and meaning inventory in employee subgroups. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00749-0
28.
DalegeJ.BorsboomD.van HarreveldF.van den BergH.ConnerM.van der MaasH. L. (2016). Toward a formalized account of attitudes: The casual attitude network (CAN) model. Psychological Review, 123(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039802
29.
Di FabioA. (2017). Positive healthy organizations: Promoting well-being, meaningfulness, and sustainability in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(NOV), Article 1938.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01938
30.
Di FabioA. (2018). The work and meaning inventory (WAMI): Primo contributo alla validazione della versione italiana. [the work and meaning inventory (WAMI): First contribution to the validation of the Italian version]. Counseling Giornale Italiano di Ricerca e Applicazioni, 11(1), https://doi.org/10.14605/CS1111808
31.
Di FabioA.BlusteinD. L. (2016). Editorial: From meaning of working to meaningful lives: The challenges of expanding decent work [Editorial]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(JUL), Article 1119.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01119
32.
Di FabioA.KennyM. E. (2018). Intrapreneurial self-capital: A key resource for promoting well-being in a shifting work landscape. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(9), Article 3035.https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093035
33.
Di FabioA.KennyM. E. (2020). The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI) at university: Psychometric properties of the Italian version for university students. Counseling Giornale Italiano di Ricerca e Applicazioni, 13(3), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.14605/CS1332001
34.
DuffyR. D.AutinK. L.BottE. M. (2015). Work volition and job satisfaction: Examining the role of work meaning and person–environment fit. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12009
35.
DuffyR. D.BlusteinD. L.DiemerM. A.AutinK. L. (2016a). The psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000140
36.
DuffyR. D.AutinK. L.DouglassR. P. (2016b). Examining how aspects of vocational privilege relate to living a calling. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1092570
37.
DuffyR. D.DikB. J. (2013). Research on calling: What have we learned and where are we going?Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.06.006
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
43.
EpskampS.FriedE. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
EpskampS.StuberS.NakJ.VeenmanM.JorgensenT.D. (2019). “semPlot”. Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages’ Output (R package version 1.1.2) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semPlot/semPlot.pdf
46.
FeggM. J.KramerM.BauseweinC.BorasioG. D. (2007). Meaning in life in the federal republic of Germany: Results of a representative survey with the Schedule for Meaning in Life Evaluation (SMiLE). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-59
47.
FongW.Cuases ArrietaJ.CabarcasJ. (2018). Academic performance and its relation with intrinsic factors in engineering students. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 11(90), 4473–4481. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2018.88472
48.
FriedE. I. (2020). Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853461
49.
FriedE. I.EidhofM. B.PalicS.CostantiniG.Huisman-van DijkH. M.BocktingC. L. H.EngelhardI.ArmourC.NielsenA. B. S.KarstoftK.-I. (2018). Replicability and generalizability of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) networks: A cross-cultural multisite study of PTSD symptoms in four trauma patient samples. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617745092
50.
FriedE. I.van BorkuloC. D.CramerA. O. J.BoschlooL.SchoeversR. A.BorsboomD. (2017). Mental disorders as networks of problems: A review of recent insights. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1319-z
51.
GoldmanZ. W.GoodboyA. K.WeberK. (2017). College Students’ psychological needs and intrinsic motivation to learn: An examination of self-determination theory. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1215338
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
HaslbeckJ. M. B.WaldorpL. J. (2018). How well do network models predict observations? On the importance of predictability in network models. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 853–861. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0910-x
56.
JohnsonM. J.JiangL. (2017). Reaping the benefits of meaningful work: The mediating versus moderating role of work engagement. Stress and Health, 33(3), 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2710
KashyapV.AroraR. (2022). Decent work and work–family enrichment: Role of meaning at work and work engagement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(1), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0133
59.
KennyM. E.CatraioC.BempechatJ.MinorK.OlleC.BlusteinD. L.SeltzerJ. (2016). Preparation for Meaningful Work and Life: Urban High School Youth’s Reflections on Work-Based Learning 1 Year Post-Graduation [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 286.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00286
LamC. F.WanW. H.RoussinC. J. (2016). Going the extra mile and feeling energized: An enrichment perspective of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000071
62.
LangeJ.DalegeJ.BorsboomD.van KleefG. A.FischerA. H. (2020). Toward an integrative psychometric model of emotions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 444–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619895057
63.
LauritzenS. L. (1996). Graphical models. Clarendon Press.
64.
LeonardoM. D. G. L.PereiraM. M.ValentiniF.FreitasC. P. P. D.DamásioB. F. (2019). Adaptation of work and meaning inventory (WAMI) to the Brazilian context. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 20(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.26707/1984-7270/2019v20n1p79
LysovaE. I.AllanB. A.DikB. J.DuffyR. D.StegerM. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.07.004
67.
MasdonatiJ.MassoudiK.BlusteinD. L.DuffyR. D. (2022). Moving toward decent work: Application of the psychology of working theory to the school-to-work transition. Journal of Career Development, 49(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845321991681
68.
MayD. R.GilsonR. L.HarterL. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
69.
McCreaR.BorehamP.FergusonM. (2011). Reducing work-to-life interference in the public service: The importance of participative management as mediated by other work attributes. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407946
PolletE.SchnellT. (2017). Brilliant: But what for? Meaning and subjective well-being in the lives of intellectually gifted and academically high-achieving adults. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(5), 1459–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9783-4
72.
PraskovaA.HoodM.CreedP. A. (2014). Testing a calling model of psychological career success in Australian young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.04.004
RossoB. D.DekasK. H.WrzesniewskiA. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
75.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23–74.
76.
SchmittmannV. D.CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.EpskampS.KievitR. A.BorsboomD. (2013). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007
77.
ShockleyK. M.UreksoyH.RodopmanO. B.PoteatL. F.DullaghanT. R. (2016). Development of a new scale to measure subjective career success: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), 128–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2046
78.
SimardA. A. P.SeidlerZ. E.OliffeJ. L.RiceS. M.KealyD.WaltherA.OgrodniczukJ. S. (2022). Job satisfaction and psychological distress among help-seeking men: Does meaning in life play a role?Behavioral Sciences, 12(3), 58. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/12/3/58. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12030058
79.
StegerM. F.DikB. J.DuffyR. D. (2012). Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI). Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 322–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160
80.
StegerM. F.Littman-OvadiaH.MillerM.MengerL.RothmannS. (2013). Engaging in work even when it is meaningless: Positive affective disposition and meaningful work interact in relation to work engagement. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(2), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712471517
81.
SvicherA.GoriA.Di FabioA. (2022). Decent work in Italy: A network analysis. Australian Journal of Career Development, 31(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/10384162221089462
van BorkuloC.van BorkR.BoschlooL.KossakowskiJ.TioP.SchoeversR.BorsboomD.WaldorpL. (2021). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychological Methods, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476
