School principals’ networking preferences for instructional and administrative advice-seeking relations: Insights from inferential social network analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
School principals’ networking preferences for instructional and administrative advice-seeking relations: Insights from inferential social network analysis
Investigating the social, structural, cognitive and individual enablers of principals’ cross-district professional relations is a challenging yet essential research endeavour. To that end, this study explores principals’ networking preferences for instructional and administrative advice-seeking relations through inferential social network analysis. Data were collected from 62 school principals serving in a large urban district of Istanbul, Türkiye. The study provides significant insights into district-wide advice-seeking relations among the participating school principals. Results highlight the importance of factors such as age, gender, long-serving experience within the same district, school location, school level, joint union membership and mutual friendship ties in shaping principals’ advice-seeking behaviours. Male principals are perceived as more resourceful, older principals are more active in seeking advice and those with less teaching experience tend to seek more instructional advice. Mutual friendships and localised principalship experience encourage principals to engage in both instructional and administrative advice relations. These findings indicate the need for tailored mentorship programmes for novice and moderately experienced older principals, as well as those with less teaching experience. Formalising these programmes ensures consistent support from senior principals in the district, leveraging their experience to help newcomers navigate instructional leadership and promote a holistic approach to school management.
Turkish Ministry of Industry and Technology (2022). SEGE 2022: İlçelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik sıralaması [The socio-economic development ranking of districts]. Development Agency of Turkish Ministry of Industry and Technology. https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/assets/pdf/birimler/2022-ilce-sege.pdf
2.
AbdurrezzakSÜstünerM (2022) Evaluation of school improvement approaches and implementation processes. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences55(3): 957–1004.
3.
AslanHBulucuS (2019) MEB Taşra teşkilatı şube müdürlerinin yaşadığı sorunlar [Problems faced by district managers of the Ministry of National Education]. In: Sosyal adalet için eğitim liderliği [Educational leadership for social justice], 14. International Educational Management Congress (ed KondakçıYEmil veSBeycioğluK), 2–4 May 2019, pp.24–31. PegemA Akademi. https://depo.pegem.net/9786050370126.pdf
4.
AzorínCMMuijsD (2017) Networks and collaboration in Spanish education policy. Educational Research59(3): 273–296.
5.
BakioğluAHacifazliogluOOzcanK (2010) The influence of trust in principals’ mentoring experiences across different career phases. Teachers and Teaching16(2): 245–258.
6.
BakioğluAÖzcanKHacıfazlıoğluÖ (2002) Okul yöneticilerinin mentor yoluyla yetiştirilme ihtiyacı (The need for mentorship in school principal preparation). In: 21th Century Leadership Training Symposium, pp.109–130: Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları.
7.
BeyciogluKKondakciY (2021) Organizational change in schools. ECNU Review of Education4(4): 788–807.
8.
BorgattiSPCarleyKMKrackhardtD (2006) On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks28(2): 124–136.
9.
BorgattiSPFosterPC (2003) The network paradigm in organisational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management29(6): 991–1013.
10.
Bridwell-MitchellENLantTK (2014) Be careful what you wish for: The effects of issue interpretation on social choices in professional networks. Organization Science25(2): 401–419.
11.
CanN (2010) Okul yöneticilerinin yönetimde cinsiyet faktörüne ilişkin görüşleri [The opinions of school principals on gender factor in Administration]. Eğitim ve Bilim33(147): 35–41.
12.
Cansoy R, Gümüş S and Walker A (2024) Challenges in implementing instructional leadership: Insights from Turkish school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership: 17411432241263915.
13.
CansoyRPolatcanM (2018) Examination of instructional leadership research in Türkiye. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences10(1): 276–291.
14.
CarolanBV (2013) Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
15.
Çelik Z, Gümüş S and Gür BS (2017) Moving beyond a monotype education in Turkey: Major reforms in the last decade and challenges ahead. Multicultural Education in Glocal Perspectives: Policy and Institutionalization: 103–119.
16.
ÇeliktenYYıldırımAÇeliktenMAyyıldızK (2019) Profesyonel okul yöneticiliği ve kadın faktörü [Professional school management and female factor]. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi6(12): 123–143.
17.
ChapmanCMuijsD (2014) Does school-to-school collaboration promote school improvement? A study of the impact of school federations on student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement25(3): 351–393.
18.
ColemanPMikkelsonLLaRocqueL (1991) Network coverage: Administrative collegiality and school district ethos in high-performing districts. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L’éducation16(2): 151–167.
19.
CoppleCBredekampS (2009) Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
20.
DalyAJFinniganKS (2011) The ebb and flow of social network ties between district leaders under high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal48(1): 39–79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27975281
21.
DalyAJFinniganKS (2012) Exploring the space between social networks, trust, and urban school district leaders. Journal of School Leadership22(3): 493–530.
22.
DalyAJMoolenaarNMCarrierNdel FresnoM (2017) The school district as a complex adaptive system. Exploring a complexity theory perspective on policy. Journal of Research on Organization in Education1: 31–59.
23.
Darling-HammondLMeyersonDLa PointeM, et al (2010) Preparing principals for a changing world: Lessons from effective school leadership programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
DayCGriceC (2019) Investigating the influence and impact of leading from the middle: A school-based strategy for middle leaders in schools. Sydney: The University of Sydney.
25.
DenizÜErdenerMA (2020) Levels of school administrators exhibiting instructional supervision behaviors: Teachers’ perspectives. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership5(4): 1038–1081. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.4.3.
26.
Díaz-GibsonJCivís-ZaragozaMGuàrdia-OlmosJ (2013) Strengthening education through collaborative networks: Leading the cultural change. School Leadership & Management34(2): 179–200.
27.
EhrichLC (1994) Mentoring and networking for women educators. Women in Management Review9(3): 4–10.
28.
EpsteinJL (2018) School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. New York: Routledge.
29.
ErdoğanÇKaramanHG (2016) Türkiye'deki eğitim sendikalarına yönelik bir inceleme: Amaçlar, beklentiler ve sorunlar [An investigation of the education unions in Türkiye: Goals, expectations and problems]. Sakarya University Journal of Education6(2): 123–140.
30.
Farag-DavisSA, 2013. School leaders and networks: Understanding principal peer dialogue as a resource for professional learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lesley University.
31.
FeysEDevosG (2014) What comes out of incentivized collaboration: A qualitative analysis of eight Flemish school networks. Educational Management Administration & Leadership43(5): 738–754.
32.
FidanTÖztürkİ (2015) Perspectives and expectations of union member and non-union member teachers on teacher unions. Journal of Educational Sciences Research5(2): 191–220.
33.
FinniganKDalyA (2010) Learning at the system level: Ties between principals of low-performing schools and central office leaders. In: DalyAJ (ed) Social Network Theory and Educational Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, pp. 179–196.
34.
GarberDH (1991) Networking among principals: A study of established practices and relationships [Conference presentation]. In: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Conference of Professors of Educational Administration, Fargo. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED337915.pdf
35.
GeeraertsKVan den BosschePVanhoofJMoolenaarN (2017) Intergenerational professional relationships in elementary school teams: A social network approach. Frontline Learning Research5(2): 78–98.
36.
GibbonsDE (2004) Friendship and advice networks in the context of changing professional values. Administrative Science Quarterly49(2): 238–262. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4131473
37.
GonzalesMMRobertsMB (2021) Leading multiple schools: An examination of franchise model school principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.2006797.
38.
GreanyTCowhittTDowneyC (2024) Do informal networks become formalised over time? Analysing school networks and multi-academy trust membership in England using ego-centric analysis. Journal of Educational Change25: 151–172.
39.
GreenTL (2018) School as community, community as school: Examining principal leadership for urban school reform and community development. Education and Urban Society50(2): 111–135.
40.
GümüşEAdaS (2017) Okul müdürlerinin katıldıkları mesleki gelişim faaliyetleri hakkındaki görüşleri: Türkiye ve ABD örnekleri [Views of school principals on professional development activities they attended: Examples from Turkey and the USA]. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi43: 176–208.
41.
Gümüş S, Hallinger P, Cansoy R and Bellibaş MŞ (2021) Instructional leadership in a centralized and competitive educational system: A qualitative meta-synthesis of research from Turkey. Journal of Educational Administration 59(6): 702–720..
42.
Gümüş S, Liu Y, Bellibaş MŞ and Lee, M. (2024) A global typology of school principals’ time use: Exploring the effects of contextual and individual factors. International Journal of Educational Research 125: 102343.
43.
HargreavesA (1994) Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.
44.
HargreavesAShirleyD (2020) Leading from the middle: Its nature, origins and importance. Journal of Professional Capital and Community5(1): 92–114.
45.
HargreavesDH (2003) Working laterally: How innovation networks make an educational epidemic. London: DEMOS, Innovation Unit.
46.
HarrisAAzorínCJonesM (2023) Network leadership: A new educational imperative?International Journal of Leadership in Education26(5): 919–935.
47.
HatchTHillKRoegmanR (2016) Investigating the role of instructional rounds in the development of social networks and district-wide improvement. American Educational Research Journal53(4): 1022–1053.
48.
HeckR (2003) Examining the impact of professional preparation on beginning school administrators. In: HallingerP (ed) Reshaping the Landscape of School Leadership Development: A Global Perspective. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger, pp. 237–256.
49.
HiteJMReynoldsBHiteS (2010) Who ya gonna call? Networks of rural school administrators. The Rural Educator31(1): 11–28.
50.
HiteJMWilliamsEJBaughSC (2005) Multiple networks of public school administrators: An analysis of network content and structure. International Journal of Leadership in Education8(2): 91–122.
51.
HittDHPlayerDW (2019) Identifying and predicting effective leader practices: Examining principal experience and prior roles. Leadership and Policy in Schools18(1): 97–116.
52.
HoyleE (1982) Micro-politics of educational organisations. Educational Management and Administration10: 87–98.
JabbarH (2016) Selling schools: Marketing and recruitment strategies in New Orleans. Peabody Journal of Education91: 4–23.
55.
KalmanMArslanMC (2016) School principals’ evaluations of their instructional leadership behaviours: Realities vs. ideals. School Leadership & Management36(5): 508–530.
56.
KayıkçıK (2013) Türkiye'de kamu ve eğitim alanında sendikalasma ve öğretmen ile okul yöneticilerinin sendikalardan beklentileri [Unionization in the public and education sector in Türkiye, and expectations of school administrators and teachers. Expectations from unions]. Amme İdaresi Dergisi47(1): 99–126.
57.
KelchtermansGBalletK (2002) Micropolitical literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research37(8): 755–767.
58.
KhanalJRanaKSharmaLWhybrowNGhimireS (2023) Context-specific leadership practices: An examination of evidence of successful community school headteachers in Nepal. Leadership and Policy in Schools22(1): 200–224.
59.
KondakciYOrucuDOguzEBeyciogluK (2019) Large-scale change and survival of school principals in Türkiye. Journal of Educational Administration and History51(4): 301–315.
60.
KossinetsG (2006) Effects of missing data in social networks. Social Networks28(3): 247–268.
61.
LimaJA (2010) Thinking more deeply about networks in education. Journal of Educational Change11(1): 1–21.
62.
LiouY-H (2016) Tied to the common core: Exploring the characteristics of reform advice relationships of educational leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly52(5): 793–840.
63.
LiouY-HDalyAJ (2018) Broken bridges: A social network perspective on urban high school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration56(5): 562–584.
64.
LusherDKoskinenJRobinsG (eds) (2013) Exponential random graph models for social networks: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65.
MarzanoRJ (ed) 2013) On excellence in teaching. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press..
66.
MassellDGoertzMEBarnesCA (2015) Engaging practitioners in state school improvement initiatives. Peabody Journal of Education90(1): 113–127. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43909816
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27(1): 415–444.
69.
Mohd TahirLBerhandden MusahMAliMFAbdullahAHHamzahMH (2023) Principals’ views on continuing professional development programmes: Evidence from Malaysia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership51(2): 440–480.
70.
MøllerJEggenAFuglestadOLLangfeldtGPresthusASkrøvsetSStjernstrømEVedøyG (2005) Successful school leadership: The Norwegian case. Journal of Educational Administration43(6): 584–594.
71.
MoolenaarNM (2010). Ties with potential: Nature, antecedents, and consequences of social networks in school teams [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Amsterdam.
72.
MoolenaarNMDalyAJSleegersPJC (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly,46(5), 623–670.
73.
MoolenaarNMSleegersPJC (2015). The networked principal: Examining principals’ social relationships and transformational leadership in school and district networks. Journal of Educational Administration,53(1), 8–39.
74.
MorrisonEW (2002). Information seeking within organizations. Human Communication Research,28(2), 229–242.
75.
MuijsD (2015). Collaboration and networking among rural schools: Can it work and when? Evidence from England. Peabody Journal of Education,90(2), 294–305.
76.
MuijsDWestMAinscowM (2010). Why network? Theoretical perspectives on networking. School Effectiveness and School Improvement21(1), −26.526.
77.
O'DohertyAOvandoMN (2013). Leading learning: First-year principals’ reflections on instructional leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 23(3), 533–561.
78.
OECD (2009). Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from TALIS, TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-en
ÖlmezÖTonbulY (2011). Eğitim yönetiminin yerelleşmesi sürecinde bir uygulama: Eğitim bölgeleri danışma kurulları (An application in the process of educational administration's localization: Educational regions advisory committee). Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 153–179.
81.
OplatkaI (2010). Principals in late career: Toward a conceptualization of Principals’ Tasks and experiences in the Pre-retirement period. Educational Administration Quarterly,46(5), 776–815.
82.
ÖztürkOM (2024). Okul müdürlerinin yönetsel süreçlere ilişkin öğrenme pratikleri: Nitel bir çözümleme (School principals’ learning practices related to administrative processes: A qualitative analysis). [Unpublished master dissertation]. Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University.
83.
PutnamRD (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
RinglingJJ (2019). Networkings role in the informal learning of elementary principals[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Old Dominion University.
86.
RobinsGLusherD (2013). Illustrations: Simulation, estimation, and goodness of fit. In LusherDKoskinenJRobinsG (eds) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks-Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 167–185.
87.
RobinsGPattisonPKalishYLusherD (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks,29(2), 173–191.
88.
RobinsonG. (2016) A social network analysis of interschool collaboration. Staff relationships in a shared education partnership. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Queen's University Belfast.
89.
RobinsonVMJ (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools,9(1), 1–26.
90.
RoegmanRLeeSHatchTStumbergerNHillK (2018). Responding to state mandates around instruction: The development of administrator social networks in an urban district. Journal of School Leadership,28(5), 672–705.
91.
SakçakAArslanYPolatS (2021). Favouritism behaviours of school principals: Teachers’ perceptions on the causes and consequences of favouritism in Turkey. Educational Studies,49(6), 877–895.
92.
ScottJG (2012). Social network analysis. London: Sage Publications.
93.
ShakedHBenolielPS (2020). Instructional boundary management: The complementarity of instructional leadership and boundary management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership,48(5), 821–839.
94.
ShawRD (2022) Professional interactions and networks of co-teaching music educators. Music Education Research,24(2), 137–151.
95.
SicilianoMD (2017). Ignoring the experts: Networks and organizational learning in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,27(1), 104–119.
96.
SmithA (2016). A management framework for regional and school-based networks for principals in diverse contexts [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. North-West University.
97.
SönmezE (2022). Türkiye'de okullar arası işbirliği uygulamalarına ilişkin bir değerlendirme [A review of school-to-school collaborations in Türkiye]. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,23(3), 2911–2933.
98.
SpillaneJPDiamondJB (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
99.
SpillaneJPHealeyK (2010). Conceptualizing school leadership and management from a distributed perspective: An exploration of some study practices and their implications. Leadership and Policy in Schools,9(3), 1–25.
100.
SpillaneJPHopkinsMSweetTM (2015). Intra- and interschool interactions about instruction: Exploring the conditions for social capital development. American Journal of Education,122(1), 71–110.
101.
SpillaneJPShirrellMAdhikariS (2018). Constructing ‘experts’ among peers: Educational infrastructure, test data, and teachers’ interactions about teaching. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,40(4), 586–612.
102.
SpillaneJPShirrellMSweetTM (2017). The elephant in the schoolhouse: The role of propinquity in school staff interactions about teaching. Sociology of Education,90(2), 149–171.
TeigNVeleticJYeW, etal (2024). Navigating resilient schools: Examining principals’ characteristics and leadership practices in eleven countries. UNESCO 2024/5 Global Education Monitoring Report. https://doi.org/10.54676/JZEG2765
105.
ThomsonSD (1989). Teaching: Foundation for the principalship. NASSP Bulletin,73(513), 36–42.
106.
TokTNYalçınN (2017). Okul yöneticileri gözünden kadın okul yöneticileri [Woman school principals in the eyes of school principals]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28, 353–366.
107.
TomlinsonCA (2014) The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
108.
TuranSŞişmanT (2002). Eğitim ve okul yönetiminde eğitim bölgesi danışma kurullarının işlevi: Kavramsal bir çözümleme (The role of regional advisory committees in education and school management: A conceptual analysis). Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 6, 136–146.
109.
Urban Poverty and Vulnerability in Istanbul Report (2021). İstanbul'da Kentsel Yoksulluk ve Kırılganlık: Covid-19 Salgınının Dar Gelirli Haneler Üzerindeki Etkisi [Urban Poverty and Vulnerability in Istanbul: Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Low-Income Households]. Istanbul Planning Agency.
110.
WangPRobinsGPattisonP (2009). PNet. Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph (p*) models. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
111.
WieczorekDManardC (2018). Instructional leadership challenges and practices of novice principals in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(2), 1–21.
112.
YangSKellerFZhengL (eds) (2017). Data collection. In Social Network Analysis: Methods and Examples (pp. 26–53). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802847
113.
YeşilMŞahin FıratN (2024). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığının taşra teşkilatında görev yapan şube müdürlerinin görev tanımlarına ilişkin görüşleri [The opinions of departmental managers working in ministry of national education’s provincial directorates on their job descriptions]. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,6(1), 141–169.
