Young adults pursue a career path in the face of many barriers, such as financial worries and parental influences. Engaging in occupational behaviours enables them to know themselves and the world better, and also provides them with opportunities to have experiences that help them decide on a career. This study adapts the Occupational Engagement Scale-Student (OES-S) into Turkish and examines its psychometric properties in a university sample. Participants consisted of 304 university students (149 females and 155 males). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the original unidimensional factor structure of the OES-S. For discriminant and concurrent validity, significant relationships were found between the OES-S and subscales of the Career Decision Scale. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach’s alpha) was .80. The results indicated that the OES-S could be considered as a valid and reliable tool to measure the occupational engagement of young adults.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1984).
The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika,
49, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294170
BacanlıF.EşiciH.ÖzünlüM. B. (2013).
Kariyer karar verme güçlüklerinin çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [Examining career decision making difficulties according to several variables]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal,
4, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.71875
4.
BagozziR. P.YiY. (1988).
On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
16, 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
5.
BaileyT. R.HughesK. L.MooreD. T. (2004). Working knowledge: Work-based learning and education reform.
Rutledge Falmer.
6.
BejerholmU.HanssonL.EklundM. (2006).
Profiles of occupational engagement in people with schizophrenia (POES): The development of a new instrument based on time-use diaries. British Journal of Occupational Therapy,
69, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802260606900203
BozgeyikliH.ErogluS. E.HamurcuH. (2009).
Career decision making self-efficacy, career maturity and socioeconomic status with Turkish youth. Georgian Electronic Scientific Journal: Education Sciences and Psychology,
1, 15–24.
11.
BubanyS. T.KrieshokT. S.BlackM. D.McKayR. A. (2008).
College students’ perspectives on their career decision making. Journal of Career Assessment,
16, 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707313189
12.
BüyüköztürkŞ. (2007). Data analysis handbook for social sciences.
Pegem Publishing.
13.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.).
Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
CasanovaM. L.PachecoL. S.CostaP.LawthomR.CoimbraJ. L. (2019).
Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the uncertainty response scale. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica,
32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-019-0135-2
16.
CoxD. W. (2008). The operationalization of occupational engagement and validation of the occupational engagement scale for students (Publication No. 3330347) [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global]. University of Kansas – Kansas.
17.
CoxD. W.KrieshokT. S.BjornsenA. L.ZumboB. D. (2015).
Occupational engagement scale-student: Development and initial validation. Journal of Career Assessment,
23, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072714523090
18.
CoxW. D.BjornsenA. B.KrieshokT.LiuY. (2016).
Occupational engagement and academic major satisfaction: Vocational identity's mediating role. The Career Development Quarterly,
64, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12049
19.
DuveM. A. (2015). An exploratory study of occupational engagement and career locus of control in sport management students (Publication No. 3709120) [Doctoral dissertation, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global]. Northcentral University.
20.
FraenkelJ. R.WallenN. E.HyunH. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education.
McGraw Hill.
GrevensteinD. (2020).
Factorial validity and measurement invariance across gender groups of the German version of the interpersonal reactivity index. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences,
2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-020-00015-2
23.
GuardadoE. (2019). Career decision self-efficacy and career decision distress: The role of occupational engagement, grit, and future work self salience among recent university graduates [Master’s thesis]. Carleton University Research Virtual Environment, Carleton University.
24.
HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).
Sage Publications.
25.
HeJ.van de VijverF. (2012).
Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural research. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture,
2, 2307–0919. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1111
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999).
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal,
6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
JenkinsL.JeskeD. (2017).
Interactive support effects on career agency and occupational engagement among young adults. Journal of Career Assessment,
25, 616–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716652891
30.
JöreskogK.SörbomD. (1999). Lisrel 8: structural equation modeling with The SIMPLIS command language.
Scientific Software International.
31.
Jung, M. N. (2011). The effects of career decision making style and occupational engagement on career attitude maturity (Unpublished master’s thesis). Korea University.
32.
Jung, M. N., & Yang, E. J. (2012). The mediating effects of occupational engagement on the relationship between career decision making style and career maturity of college students. Korea Youth Research, 19, 47–70.
33.
KhasawnehS. (2011).
Occupational engagement among university students in Jordan: Adaptation to careers in the future. Australian Journal of Career Development,
20, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/103841621102000104
34.
KimH. J.KimS. Y.DuffyR. D.NguyenN. P.WangD. (2019).
A cross-cultural comparison of psychology of working theory among US and Korean college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
67, 568–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000408
35.
KimN. R.KimH. J.LeeK. H. (2018).
Social support and occupational engagement among Korean undergraduates: The moderating and mediating effect of work volition. Journal of Career Development,
45, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845316682319
36.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.).
Guilford Press.
37.
KohK. H.ZumboB. D. (2008).
Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis for testing measurement invariance in mixed item format data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods,
7, 471–477. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1225512660
38.
Korkut-OwenF. (2008). Mesleki seçimleri etkileyen ana etmenler [The main factors affecting professional choices]. In ÖzyürekR. (Ed.), Kariyer yolculuğu [Carrer Journey] (pp. 1–23).
Ulusal Ajans.
39.
KrieshokT. S.BlackM. D.McKayR. A. (2009).
Career decision making: The limits of rationality and the abundance of non-conscious processes. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
75, 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.006
LeachS.ImmekusJ. C.FrenchB. F.HandB. (2020).
The factorial validity of the Cornell critical thinking tests: A multi-analytic approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity,
37, 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100676
42.
LeongF. T.HartungP. J. (2000).
Cross-cultural career assessment: Review and prospects for the new millennium. Journal of Career Assessment,
8, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270000800408
43.
MalhotraN. K.DashS. (2011). Marketing research and applied orientation.
Pearson Publishing.
ÖzdemirS. (2010). Ön lisans muhasebe öğrencilerinin kariyer planlamasını etkileyen unsurlar: Ege bölgesinde bir araştırma [Factors affecting career planning of accounting and finance management students: A research in the Aegean region] [Master’s thesis]. DSpace, Pamukkale University.
46.
ÖztemelK. (2014).
Duygusal ve kişilik ilişkili kariyer karar verme güçlükleri ölçeği’nin kısa formu [Short form of emotional and personality-related career decision-making difficulties scale]. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal,
5, 244–255. https://doi.org/10.17066/pdrd.17537
47.
ÖzyürekR. (2001).
Global kariyer yetkinlik beklentisi ölçümü ve meslek danışmanlığı uygulamalarında kullanımı [Global career competence expectation measurement and its use in vocational counseling applications]. Journal of Education Management in Theory and Practice,
7, 557–571. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kuey/issue/10368/126904
48.
ŞaraP.KocabaşA. (2012).
Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sınıf öğretmenliğini tercih nedenleri ve aldıkları eğitimle ilgili görüşleri [The reasons for primary school teacher candidates to prefer primary school teaching and their opinions on the education they received]. Turkish International Journal of Special Education and Guidance, & Counselling,
1(2), 8–17.
49.
SarıkayaT.KhorshidL. (2009).
Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçiminini etkileyen etmenlerin incelenmesi: Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi [The investigation of the factors that affect university students’ profession choice: University students’ profession choice.] Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences,
7, 393–423.
50.
SavickasM. L. (2005). The theory and practice of career construction. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 42–70).
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
TabachnickB. G.FidelL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics(6th ed.).
Pearson Publishing.
53.
TavşancılE. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Nobel Publishing.
54.
The Council of Higher Education. (n.d.). 2019–2020 öğretim yılı yükseköğretim istatistikleri [2019–2020 academic year higher education statistics]. https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/
55.
VurucuF. (2010). Meslek lisesi öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi yeterliliği ve meslek seçimini etkileyen faktörler [Vocational and technical high school students’ efficacy of career decision and factors affecting their decision process] (Master’s thesis, Thesis No. 249055). Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Yeditepe University.
56.
VuykM. A.LeiY.KrieshokT. S.CodasG. (2019).
Occupational engagement and positive psychological measures in two collectivistic cultures. Journal of Career Development,
47, 611–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319832668
57.
YıldırımF.BarnettR. V. (2017). Comparing the effects of specific variables on passionate love among young people: A cross-cultural study. In SiltonN. R. (Ed.), Family dynamics and romantic relationships a changing society (pp. 62–83).
IGI Global.
58.
Yılmazİ. A.DursunB.PektaşK.AltayA. (2012).
Üniversite öğrencilerinin kariyer seçimlerinin demografik özellikler açısından incelenmesi: Pınarhisar MYO örneği [Career choices of university students in terms of demographic characteristics: The sample of Pinarhisar Vocational College]. Electronic Journal of Vocational Colleges,
2, 9–21.
59.
YusupuR. (2015). Üniversite öğrencilerinde kariyer kararları ile mükemmeliyetçilik, öğrenme motivasyonu ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkiler [Relationships between career decisions, perfectionism, learning motivation and academic success among universtiy students] (Master’s thesis, Thesis No. 249055). Council of Higher Education Thesis Center, Dokuz Eylul University.
