Unemployment may be considered a normal, if not likely, experience of a person's lifelong career. This paper is based on a primary, qualitative study that focused on the way mature-aged unemployed citizens experience government unemployment and employment agencies: Centrelink and the Job Network in a large regional city. It contributes to existing research that examines the experiences of particular unemployed groups as they negotiate their journey through these systems. Three themes emerged from the research, which was based on multiple in-depth interviews of 21 participants: the first was participants' experiences of disregard, disrespect and discrimination; the second was the restrictiveness of job information; the third was inappropriate job matching and inadequate employability training. We conclude that the experience of our participants supports criticisms made in other research about the restrictiveness and inadequacy of Job Network services, particularly for disadvantaged job seekers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BogdanR.BiklenS. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
BorlandJ.TsengY. (2004). Does ‘Work for the Dole’ work?Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
3.
CarneyT.RamiaG. (2002). Mutuality, Mead and McClure: More ‘big M's’ for the unemployed. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 37 (3), 277–300.
4.
ConsidineM. (2003). Governance and competition: The role of non-profit organisations in the delivery of public services. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38 (1), 63–77.
Department of Education, Science and Training. (2006). Shaping the future: Connecting career development and workforce development. Australian Journal of Career Development, 15 (3), 25–32.
8.
EardleyT. (2002). Identifying and quantifying the costs of unemployment. In SaundersP.TaylorR. (Eds.), The price of prosperity: The economic and social costs of unemployment (pp. 44–64). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
9.
EardleyT.AbelloD.MacdonaldH. (2001). Is the Job Network benefiting disadvantaged job seekers? Preliminary evidence from a study of non-profit employment services. Social Policy Research Centre, Discussion Paper 111. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
10.
EncelS.StudenckiH. (1997). Gendered ageism: A study of job search experiences of older workers, Sydney: New South Wales Consultative Committee on Ageing.
11.
FowkesL. (2009). Implications of the economic crisis for employment services. Impact, Summer issue, 23–27.
12.
GergenK. (1995). Social construction and the education process. In SteffeL.GaleJ. (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 17–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
GubaE. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In GubaE. (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17–27). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
HammerS. (2003). Mutual obligation: Why reciprocity is an inadequate principle for unemployment programmes. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics, 5 (1), 14–24.
15.
HancockL. (2006). Mature workers, training and using TLM frameworks. Australian Bulletin of Labour, 32 (3), 257–279.
16.
HandyJ.DavyD. (2007). Gendered ageism: Older women's experiences of employment agency practices. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 45 (1), 85–99.
17.
KerrL.CarsonE.GoddardJ. (2002). Contractualism, employment services and mature age job seekers: The tyranny of tangible outcomes. Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3 (2), 83–104.
18.
Van ManenM. (1990). Research lived experience. New York: State University of New York.
19.
MarstonG.McDonaldC. (2008). Feeling motivated yet? Long-term unemployed people's perspectives on the implementation of workfare in Australia. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 43 (2), 255–269.
20.
McDonaldC.MarstonG.BuckleyA. (2003). Risk technology in Australia: The role of the Job Seeker classification instrument in employment services. Critical Social Policy, 23 (4), 498–525.
21.
MendesP. (2000). Reconstituting the public as the private: John Howard on the welfare state. Journal of Economic and Social Policy, 4 (2), 33–47.
22.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
PattonW. (2001). Facilitating career guidance for unemployed workers. In PattonW.McMahonM. (Eds.), Career development programs: Preparation for lifelong career decision-making (pp. 144–151). Melbourne: ACER Press.
24.
PawarM. (2005). Employment officers' views on the operations of Job Network in a non metropolitan area. Rural Society15 (2), 312–329.
25.
QuigginJ. (2001). Active labour market policy and macroeconomic stabilisation. Drawing Board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 2 (2), 51–66.
26.
RapsonM. (2006). The Job Network of ‘supply-side’ profiteering. Dissent, 20 (Autumn/Winter), 40–46.
27.
SchwandtT. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118–137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28.
SheridanT. A. (2008). Career transitions: The experiences of unemployed women managers. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17 (2), 38–46.
29.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
30.
StrombackT. (2008). The Job Network and underemployment. Economic Papers, 27 (3), 286–302.
31.
ThomasM. (2007). A review of developments in the Job Network. Research paper 15. Department of Parliamentary Services, Commonwealth Parliamentary Library. Retrieved 30 April 2009, from http://www.aph.gov.au/library/Pubs/rp/2007-08/08rp15.pdf.
