A two-stage model of performance appraisal is presented which argues that most performance judgments are made at the time performance is observed and therefore manipulations which affect only the rating stage will have little effect on performance judgment. Data indicate that a more useful model of performance appraisal views overt rating as a reconstruction of stored on-line performance judgments influenced by the rater's prior rating experiences reflected in their categorization operations.
Banaji, M., Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. (1993) Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 272-81.
2.
Bargh, J.A. (1984) Automatic and conscious processing of social information . In R. Wyer & T. Srull (eds), Handbook of social cognition, vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Bargh, J.A. (1989) Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J.S. Uleman & J.A. Bargh (eds), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). NY: Guilford.
4.
Bargh, J.A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982) Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 437-49.
5.
Bargh, J.A., & Thein, R.D. (1985) Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49: 1129-46.
6.
Carlston, D.E. (1980) The recall and use of traits and events in social inference processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 16: 303-28.
7.
Carlston, D.E., & Skowronski, J.J. (1986) Trait memory and behavior memory: The effects of alternative pathways on impression judgment response times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 5-13.
8.
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences . 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9.
DeNisi, A.S. & Williams, K.J. (1988) Cognitive approaches to performance appraisal. In G. Ferris and K. Rowland (eds), Research in personnel and human resource management, vol. 6. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
10.
Einhorn, H.J., & Hogarth, R.M. (1985) Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference . Psychological Review, 92: 433-61.
11.
Ericsson, K.A. & Kintsch, W. (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102: 211-45.
12.
Fiske, S.T. (1988) Compare and contrast: Brewer's dual process model and Fiske et al.'s continuum model. In T.K. Srull & R.S. Wyer, Jr (eds), Advances in social cognition, vol. 1 (pp. 65-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Fiske, S.T., & Neuberg, S.L. (1990) A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 23: 1-74.
14.
Gobet, F., & Simon, H.A. (1995) Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Complex information processes, Working Paper #513Pittsburgh, PA: Camegie Mellon University.
15.
Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1): 4-27.
16.
Härtel, C.E.J. (1993) Field independence/dependence as a predictor of attitude toward and psychometric quality of ratings on four different formats . Journal of Applied Psychology, 78: 212-17.
17.
Hartel, C.E.J., Douthitt, S., Hartel, G.F., & Douthitt, S. (1999). Equally qualified but unequally perceived: General cultural openness as a predictor of discriminatory performance ratings. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(1): 79-89.
18.
Härtel, C.E.J., & Härtel, G.F. (1995) Controller resource management- What can we learn from aircrews? (DOT/FAA/AM 95/21). Oklahoma City: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
19.
Härtel, C.E.J., & Härtel, G.F. (1996) Making decision making training work. Training Research Journal, 2: 69-84.
20.
Härtel, C.E.J., & Härtel, G.F. (1997, September) SHAPE-assisted intuitive decision making and problem solving: Information-processing-based training for conditions of cognitive busyness. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1(3): 187-99.
21.
Härtel, C.E.J., Härtel, G.F., & Barney, M.F. (1998) SHAPE: Improving decision-making by aligning organizational characteristics with decision-making requirements and training employees in a metacognitive framework for decision-making and problem-solving. Training Research Journal, 4: 79-101.
22.
Härtel, C.E.J., & Trumble, R.B. (February, 1997) IDADA: The Individual Difference Approach to Diversity Awareness. Management Paper Series #36, Brisbane : University of Queensland, Graduate School of Management.
23.
Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986) The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93: 258-68.
24.
Higgins, E.T., & King, G. (1981) Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J.F. Kihlstrom (eds), Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
25.
Higgins, E.T., King, G.A., & Mavin, G.H. (1982) Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43: 35-47.
26.
Ilgen, D.R. & Feldman, J.M. (1983) Performance appraisal: A process focus. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (eds), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 5. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Leyens, J.P., & Fiske, S.T. (1994) Impression formation: From recitals to symphonie fantastique. In P.G. Devine, D.L. Hamilton, & T.M. Ostrom (eds), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 39-75). Sydney: Academic Press.
29.
Lingle, J.H., & Ostrom, T.M. (1979) Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37: 180-94.
30.
Louis, M.R., & Sutton, R.I. (1991) Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44: 55-76.
31.
Martin, L.L., & Clark, L.F. (1990) Social cognition: Exploring the mental processes involved in human social interaction. In M.W. Eysenck (ed.), Cognitive psychology: An international review (pp. 265-310). New York: John Wiley.
32.
Murphy, K.R. & Cleveland, J.N. (1991) Performance appraisal: An organizational perspective. Sydney: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
Murphy, K.R., & Constans, J.I. (1987) Behavioral anchors as a source of bias in rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 573-9.
34.
Murphy, K.R., & Pardaffy, V.A. (1989) Bias in behaviorally-anchored rating scales: Global or scale-specific?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 343-6.
35.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1990) Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin,107(3): 375-84.
36.
Schwarz, N., Hippler, H.J., Deutsch, B., & Strack, F. (1985) Response scales: Effects of category range on reported behavior and comparative judgments. Public Opinion Quarterly , 49: 388-95.
37.
Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J.J. (1991) The law of cognitive structure activation. Psychological Inquiry, 2: 169-84.
38.
Srull, T.K., & Wyer, R.S., Jr (1989) Person memory and judgment. Psychological Review, 96(1): 58-84.
39.
Tourangeau, R., & Rasinski, K.A. (1988) Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin,103: 299-314.
40.
Uleman, J.S. (1987) Consciousness and control: The case of spontaneous trait inferences. BulletinPersonality and Social Psychology , 13: 337-54.
