This investigation focused on identifying the determinants of employee benefit preferences in a large New Zealand retail organisation (N = 229). The study delved beyond previous research by examining the role of individual difference variables in explaining employee benefit preferences in addition to commonly studied demographic variables. Specifically, it was hypothesised that work values and the five-factor model traits of personality would explain incremental variance in employee benefit preferences, beyond the effects of demographics. This hypothesis was supported for education-supportive benefit preferences, which were predicted by status and independence work values, extroversion, conscientiousness, age, education, and job category. However, family-supportive benefit preferences appeared to be driven solely by demographics (marital status, number of dependants and employment status). The implications of these findings and possible applied uses are discussed.
Aguinis, H., J.C. Beaty, R.J. Boik, and C.A. Pierce.2005. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review . Journal of Applied Psychology90(1): 94-107.
2.
Barber, A.E., R.B. Dunham, and R.A. Formisano.1992. The impact of flexible benefits on employee satisfaction: A field study. Personnel Psychology45(1): 55-76.
3.
Barringer, M.W., and G.T. Milkovich.1996. Employee health insurance decisions in a flexible benefits environment. Human Resource Management35(3): 293-315.
4.
Cable, D.M., and T.A. Judge.1994. Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person- organisation fit perspective. Personnel Psychology47(2): 317-48.
5.
Costa, P.T., and R.R. McCrae .2003. Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. 2nd edn. New York: Guildford Press.
6.
Frone, M.R., and J.K. Yardley.1996. Workplace family-supportive programmes: Predictors of employed parents' importance ratings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology69(4): 351-66.
7.
Furnham, A.1992. Personality at work: The role of individual differences in the workplace. London: Routledge .
8.
Goldberg, L.R.1992. The development of markers for the big-five factor structure . Psychological Assessment4(1): 26-42.
9.
Goldberg, L.R.1999. A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In Personality psychology in Europe, eds I. Mervielde , I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and F. Ostendorf, vol. 7, 7-28. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
10.
Guenole, N., and O.S. Chernyshenko .2005. The suitability of Goldberg's Big Five personality markers in New Zealand: A dimensionality, bias, and criterion validity evaluation. New Zealand Journal of Psychology34(2): 85-95.
11.
Haslinger, J.A., and D. Sheerin.1994. Employee input: The key to successful benefits programs. Compensation and Benefits Review26(3): 61-70.
12.
Hedge, J.W., W.C. Borman, and S.E. Lammlein.2006. The aging workforce. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
Lawler, E.E.1990. Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
14.
Major, D.A., J.E. Turner, and T.D. Fletcher.2006. Linking proactive personality and the big five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of Applied Psychology91(4): 927-35.
15.
Manhardt, P.J.1972. Job orientation of male and female college graduates in business. Personnel Psychology25(2): 361-8.
16.
Meisenheimer, J.R., and W.J. Wiatroeski .1989. Flexible benefits plans: Employees who have a choice. Monthly Labor Review112(12): 17-23.
17.
Metlife Incorporated.2006. The Metlife study of employee benefits trends: Findings from the 2005 national survey of employees and employers . New York: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company.
18.
Meyer, J.P., N.J. Allen, and C.A. Smith.1993. Commitment to organisations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualisation. Journal of Applied Psychology78(4): 538-51.
19.
Meyer, J.P., P.G. Irving, and N.J. Allen.1998. Examination of the combined effects of work values and early work experiences on organisational commitment. Journal of Organisational Behaviour19 (1): 29-52.
20.
Nealey, S.M.1964. Determining worker preferences among employee benefit programs. Journal of Applied Psychology48(1): 7-12.
21.
Roberts, B.W., O.S. Chernyshenko, S. Stark, and L.R. Goldberg.2005. The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires . Personnel Psychology58(1): 103-39.
22.
Rushton, P.J., C.J. Brainerd, and M. Pressley.1983. Behavioral development and construct validity: The principle of aggregation. Psychological Bulletin94(1): 18-38.
23.
Sinclair, R.R., M.C. Leo, and C. Wright.2005. Benefit system effects on employees' benefit knowledge, use, and organisational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology20(1): 3-29.
24.
Statistics NZ2007. Main indicators. Statistics New Zealand website accessed 24 January 2007 from http://www.statsnz.govt.nz .
25.
White, R.A.1983. Employee preferences for non-taxable compensation offered in a cafeteria compensation plan: An empirical study. Accounting Review58(3): 539-60.
