Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-2
Desirable leadership attributes are preferentially associated with women: A quantitative study of gender and leadership roles in the Australian workforce
Women are under-represented globally in leadership roles. One theory suggests that this imbalance is due to a mismatch between the qualities women are perceived to have, and the qualities desired in business leaders. Yet, little is known about whether this incongruence remains prevalent in the Australian business environment. To this end, this study investigated gender stereotypes and desired leadership attributes in 1885 participants from 25 companies using a priopietary measure developed by a local diversity consulting company. Participants ranked the attributes that they believed were most important for leadership and rated the degree to which each attribute was associated with men or women. Men were more strongly associated with some agentic traits, whereas women were more strongly associated with a diverse range of both agentic and communal traits. Desired leadership qualities included both agentic and communal qualities, but generally favoured traits associated with women.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
6.
BaxterDIGoffinKSzwejczewskiM (2014) The repertory grid technique as a customer insight method. Research-Technology Management57: 35–42.
7.
BerkeryEMorleyMTiernanS (2013) Beyond gender role stereotypes and requisite managerial characteristics: From communal to androgynous, the changing views of women. Gender in Management: An International Journal28: 278–298.
8.
BrammerSMillingtonAPavelinS (2007) Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review15: 393–403.
9.
BrescollVL (2016) Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly27: 415–428.
10.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
11.
CramérH (1946) Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
DezsöCLRossDG (2012) Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal33: 1072–1089.
13.
DuehrEEBonoJE (2006) Men, women, and managers: Are stereotypes finally changing?Personnel Psychology59: 815–846.
14.
EaglyAHHeilmanME (2016) Gender and leadership: Introduction to the special issue. The Leadership Quarterly27: 349–353.
15.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109: 573–598.
16.
EaglyAHJohannesen-SchmidtMCVan EngenML (2003) Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin129: 596–591.
17.
EaglyAHMakhijaniMGKlonskyBG (1992) Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin111: 3.
FitzsimmonsTWCallanVJ (2016) Applying a capital perspective to explain continued gender inequality in the C-suite. The Leadership Quarterly27: 354–370.
20.
GalbreathJ (2016) Is board gender diversity linked to financial performance? The mediating mechanism of CSR. Business & Society57: 863–889.
21.
HainesELDeauxKLofaroN (2016) The times they are a-changing… or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly40: 353–363.
22.
HooblerJMLemmonGWayneSJ (2014) Women’s managerial aspirations an organizational development perspective. Journal of Management40: 703–730.
23.
Howe-WalshLTurnbullS (2016) Barriers to women leaders in academia: Tales from science and technology. Studies in Higher Education41: 415–428.
24.
HoytCLBurnetteJL (2013) Gender bias in leader evaluations: Merging implicit theories and role congruity perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin39: 1306–1319.
25.
HoytCLMurphySE (2016) Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership. The Leadership Quarterly27: 387–399.
IsidroHSobralM (2015) The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics132: 1–19.
28.
JianGFairhurstGT (2016) Leadership in organizations. In ScottCRLewisLet al. (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication.Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley & Sons.
29.
KangHChengMGraySJ (2007) Corporate governance and board composition: Diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review15: 194–207.
30.
KarkRWaismel -ManorRShamirB (2012) Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly23: 620–640.
31.
KellyGA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
32.
KlettnerAClarkeTBoersmaM (2016) Strategic and regulatory approaches to increasing women in leadership: Multilevel targets and mandatory quotas as levers for cultural change. Journal of Business Ethics133: 395–419.
33.
KoenigAMEaglyAHMitchellAAet al. (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin137: 616–642.
34.
KrookMLNorrisP (2014) Beyond quotas: Strategies to promote gender equality in elected office. Politicial Studies62: 2–20.
35.
LiW-DArveyRDSongZ (2011) The influence of general mental ability, self-esteem and family socioeconomic status on leadership role occupancy and leader advancement: The moderating role of gender. The Leadership Quarterly22: 520–534.
36.
LoweKBKroeckKGSivasubramaniamN (1996) Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the mlq literature. The Leadership Quarterly7: 385–425.
37.
LynessKSHeilmanME (2006) When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Applied Psychology91: 777–785
Paustian-UnderdahlSCWalkerLSWoehrDJ (2014) Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology99: 1129–1145.
43.
PostCByronK (2015) Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal58: 1546–1571.
44.
PowellGButterfieldDAParentJD (2002) Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed?Journal of Management28: 177–193.
45.
RayJWShadishWR (1996) How interchangeable are different estimators of effect size?Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology64: 1316–1325.
46.
RosetteASKovalCZMaAet al. (2016) Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. The Leadership Quarterly27: 429–445.
47.
ScheinV (1973) The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology57: 95–100.
48.
SchuhSCHernandez BarkASVan QuaquebekeNet al. (2014) Gender differences in leadership role occupancy: The mediating role of power motivation. Journal of Business Ethics120: 363–379.
49.
ŠidákZK (1967) Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association62: 626–633.
50.
SojoVEWoodREWoodSAet al. (2016) Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly27: 519–536.
51.
StokerJIVan der VeldeMLammersJ (2012) Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology27: 31–42.
52.
TanFBHunterMG (2002) The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly26: 39–57.
53.
TerjesenSAguileraRVLorenzR (2015) Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics128: 233–251.
54.
VialACNapierJLBrescollVL (2016) A bed of thorns: Female leaders and the self-reinforcing cycle of illegitimacy. The Leadership Quarterly27: 400–414.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
