Two studies examined how feedback content and recipients' attributions for supervisor motivations in providing feedback influence Chinese recipients' affective reactions. The results show that fine details in the feedback message are lost, with no perceived differences between objective or subjective feedback elements. Additionally, reactions to feedback were moderated by the recipients' attributions for why the supervisor had provided feedback, and these attributions were strongly influenced by prior relationships. When recipients have poor relationships with the supervisor, feedback is perceived as a message about the relationship rather than about poor performance. It is concluded that the social (non-task) elements of performance feedback are as important as the task-performance-related elements.
Bailey, J.R., C.C. Chen, and S.G. Dou.1997. Conceptions of self and performance-related feedback in the US, Japan and China. Journal of International Business Studies28(3): 605-25.
2.
Bandura, A.1991. Social cognitive theory of self regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 248-87.
3.
Bannister, B.D.1986. Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology71(2): 203-10.
4.
Borman, W.C., and S.J. Motowidlo.1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In Personnel selection in organizations, eds N. Schmitt and W. Borman, 71-98. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
5.
Brief, A.P., and Motowidlo, S.J.1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review11(4): 710-25.
6.
Brockner, J., and Y.R. Chen.1996. The moderating roles of self-esteem and self-construal in reaction to a threat to the self: Evidence from the People's Republic of China and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71(3): 603-15.
7.
Carroll, S.J., and Schneier, C.E.1982. Performance appraisal and review systems: The identification, measurement and development of performance in organizations. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
8.
Chow, I.H.S.1994. An opinion survey of performance appraisal practices in Hong Kong and the People's Republic of China. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources32(3): 67-79.
9.
DeCarlo, T.E., and T.W. Leigh.1996. Impact of salesperson attraction on sales managers' attributions and feedback. Journal of Marketing60(2): 47-66.
10.
Fedor, D.B., and M.R. Buckley.1990. Measuring subordinate perceptions of supervisor feedback intentions: Some unsettling results. Educational and Psychological Measurement50(1), 73-89.
11.
Fedor, D.B., R.W. Eder, and M.R. Buckley.1989. The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes44(3): 396-414.
12.
Hempel, P.S.2001. Differences between Chinese and western managerial views of performance. Personnel Review30(2): 203-26.
13.
Huo, Y.P., and M.A. Von Glinow .1995. On transplanting human resource practices to China: A culture-driven approach. International Journal of Manpower16(9): 3-15.
14.
Hwang, K.K.1995. Modernization of the Chinese family business. In Effective organizations and social values, eds H.S.R. Kao, D. Sinha , and S.H. Ng, 28-36.. London : SAGE Publications.
15.
Ilgen, D.R., C.D. Fisher, and M.S. Taylor.1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology64(4): 349-71.
16.
Ilgen, D.R., and J.R. Hollenbeck .1991. The structure of work: Jobs and roles. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology , eds M. Dunnette and L. Hough, 165-207. 2nd edn. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
17.
Kluger, A.N., and A. DeNisi.1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin119(2): 254-84.
18.
Lam, S.S.K., M.S.M. Yik, and J. Schaubroeck.2002. Responses to formal performance appraisal feedback: The role of negative affectivity. Journal of Applied Psychology87(1): 192-291.
19.
Landy, F.J., and J.L. Farr.1983. The measurement of work performance: Methods, theory, and applications. New York: Academic Press.
20.
Leung, K., S. Su, and M.W. Morris.2001. When is criticism not constructive? The roles of fairness perceptions and dispositional attributions in employee acceptance of critical supervisory feedback. Human Relations54(9): 1155-87.
21.
Leung, K., and S. Su.2004. Experimental methods for research on culture and management. In Handbook for international management research, eds B.J. Punnett and O. Shenkar, 68-95. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
22.
Levy, P.E., and J.R. Williams.1998. The role of perceived system knowledge in predicting appraisal reactions, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment . Journal of Organizational Behavior19(1): 53-65.
23.
Li, L., and B.H. Kleiner.2001. The legacy of `Danwei' and job performance . Management Research News24(3/4): 57-66.
24.
Liden, R.C., G.R. Ferris, and R.M. Dienesch.1988. The influence of causal feedback on subordinate reactions and behavior. Group and Organization Studies13(3): 348-73.
25.
Murphy, K.R., and J.N. Cleveland.1995. Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
26.
Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.Y. Lee, and N.P. Podsakoff.2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879-903.
27.
Silver, W.S., T.R. Mitchell, and M.E. Gist.1995Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes62(3): 286-99.
28.
Smith, C.A., D.W. Organ, and J.P. Near.1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology68(4): 653-63.
29.
Tsui, A.S., and B.A. Gutek.1984. A role set analysis of gender differences in performance, affective relationships, and career success of industrial middle managers. Academy of Management Journal27(3): 619-35.
30.
Varma, A., A.S. DeNisi, and L.H. Peters.1996. Interpersonal affect and performance appraisal: A field study. Personnel Psychology49(2): 341-60.
31.
Walder, A.G.1986. Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley: SAGE Publications.
32.
Watson, D., L.A. Clark, and A. Tellegen.1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54(6): 1063-70.
