Beyond ISTJ: A discourse-analytic study of the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as an organisational change device in an Australian industrial firm
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2007
Beyond ISTJ: A discourse-analytic study of the use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as an organisational change device in an Australian industrial firm
Although the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is widely deployed in work organisations, very little is known about how HR practitioners customise it for use, how employees react to being typed, and how (or if) they apply it in their daily work. This article reports the findings of a study that used interviews with HR practitioners and employees to investigate perceptions and uses of the MBTI in an Australian manufacturing site. A variety of interpretations and uses was found, illustrating that the effects of a device like the MBTI cannot simply be read off from the normative claims contained within it. Despite the variety of uses to which the tool was put, employees judged its effects to be moderately beneficial.
Badham, R., K. Garrety, V. Morrigan, M. Zanko, and P. Dawson.2003. Designer deviance: Enterprise and deviance in culture change programmes. Organization10(4): 707—30.
2.
Bridges, W.1992. The character of organizations: Using Jungian type in organizational development. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
3.
Browning, V., and F. Edgar.2004. Reactions to HRM: An employee perspective from South Africa and New Zealand. Journal of the Australian and New ZealandAcademy of Management10(2): 1—14.
4.
Center for Applications of Psychological Type. www.capt.org/The_MBTI_Instrument/Home.cfm. Accessed 2 September 2005.
5.
Fleck, J.1999. Learning by trying: The implementation of configurational technology. In The social shaping of technology, eds D. Mackenzie and J. Wajcman , 244—57. London: Open University Press.
6.
Foucault, M.1982. Afterword: The subject and power. In Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, eds H.L. Dreyfus and P. Rabinow, 208—26. New York: Harverster Wheatsheaf.
7.
Foucault, M.1988. Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault, eds L.H. Martin, H. Gutman, P.H. Hutton, 16—49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
8.
Gardner, W.L., and M.J. Martinko.1996. Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to study managers: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Management22(1): 45—83.
9.
Garrety K.2006. Reflexivity and normative change. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and ChangeManagement5(6): 68—75.
10.
Garrety, K., R. Badham, V. Morrigan, W. Rifkin and M. Zanko.2003. The use of personality typing in organisational change: Discourse, emotions and the reflexive subject. Human Relations56(2): 211—35.
11.
Grant, D., and J. Shields.2002. In search of the subject: Researching employee reactions to human resources management. Journal of Industrial Relations44(3): 313—34.
12.
Grant, D., C. Hardy, C. Oswick, and L. Putnam.2004. Introduction: Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In The Sage handbook of organizational discourse, eds D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, and L. Putnam, 1—36. London: SAGE Publications.
13.
Guest, D.E.1999. Human resource management — the worker's verdict . Human Resource Management Journal9(3): 5—25.
14.
Holmer-Nadesan, M.1997. Constructing paper dolls: The discourse of personality testing in organizational practice. Communication Theory7(3): 189—218.
15.
Jaques, E.1989. Requisite organisation: The CEO's guide to creative structure and leadership. Arlington, VA: Cason Hall and Company.
16.
Jessup, C.M.2002. Applying psychological type and `gifts differing' to organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management15(5): 502—11.
17.
Jung, C.G.1921/1971. Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Maravelias, C.2003. Post-bureaucracy — control through professional freedom. Journal of Organizational Change Management16(5): 547—66.
19.
McLoughlin, I.P., R. Badham, and G. Palmer.2005. Cultures of ambiguity: Design, emergence and ambiguity in the introduction of normative control. Work, Employment and Society19(1): 67—90.
20.
Michael, J.2003. Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a tool for leadership development? Apply with caution. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies10(1): 68—81.
