This study investigates how employees craft narratives of organisational change failure through the lens of their work identity. We analysed change recipients’ retrospective sensemaking accounts of an organisational re-structuring in a university, finding these accounts to be filled with widely varying descriptions of failure – of errors, dysfunction, and loss. We explored how employees’ organisational, professional, and work-group identities were intertwined with, and fundamentally challenged by, their sensemaking about the change and its failure. Our inductive analysis revealed four distinct narrative trajectories – Identity Loss, Identity Revision, Identity Affirmation, and Identity Resilience – each characterised by distinct cognitive, affective, and behavioural patterns. We discuss the unique contributions that this study makes to the literatures on organisational change failure, sensemaking, and identity.
BalogunJJohnsonG (2004) Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal47(4): 523–549.
4.
BalogunJJohnsonG (2005) From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies26(11): 1573–1601.
5.
BalogunJBartunekJMDoB (2015) Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organization Science26(4): 960–979.
6.
BartunekJMRousseauDMRudolphJW, et al. (2006) On the receiving end: Sensemaking, emotion, and assessments of an organizational change initiated by others. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science42(2): 182–206.
7.
BattilanaJCasciaroT (2012) Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal55(2): 381–398.
8.
BeerMNohriaN (2000) Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review78(May–June): 133–141.
9.
BindlUK (2019) Work-related proactivity through the lens of narrative: Investigating emotional journeys in the process of making things happen. Human Relations72(4): 615–645.
10.
BordiaPHobmanEJonesE, et al. (2004) Uncertainty during organizational change: Types, consequences, and management strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology18(4): 507–532.
11.
BouckenoogheD (2010) Positioning change recipients’ attitudes toward change in the organizational change literature. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science46(4): 500–531.
12.
CannonMDEdmondsonAC (2001) Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior22(2): 161–177.
13.
CazaBBVoughHPuranikH (2018) Identity work in organizations and occupations: Definitions, theories, and pathways forward. Journal of Organizational Behavior39(7): 889–910.
14.
ConroySAO’Leary-KellyAM (2014) Letting go and moving on: Work-related identity loss and recovery. Academy of Management Review39(1): 67–87.
15.
CordinerMThomasSGreenW (2018) Do labels matter when implementing change? Implications of labelling an academic as a champion − results from a case study. Studies in Higher Education43(3): 484–499.
16.
CorleyKGGioiaDA (2004) Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly49(2): 173–208.
17.
CrosinaEPrattMG (2019) Toward a model of organizational mourning: The case of former Lehman Brothers bankers. Academy of Management Journal62(1): 66–98.
18.
DaskalakiMSimosiM (2018) Unemployment as a liminoid phenomenon: Identity trajectories in times of crisis. Human Relations71(9): 1153–1178.
19.
DuttonJERobertsLMBednarJ (2010) Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of Management Review35(2): 265–293.
20.
ElsbachKD (2009) Identity affirmation through signature style: A study of toy car designers. Human Relations62(7): 1041–1072.
21.
Eriksson-ZetterquistULindbergKStyhreA (2009) When the good times are over: Professionals encountering new technology. Human Relations62(8): 1145–1170.
22.
Fair Work Ombudsman (2014) Best practice guide: Consultation and cooperation in the workplace. Canberra: Australian Government.
23.
FiskeSTCuddyAJGlickP, et al. (2002) A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology82(6): 878–902.
24.
GephartRPSteierLLawrenceT (1990) Cultural rationalities in crisis sensemaking: A study of a public inquiry into a major industrial accident. Industrial Crisis Quarterly4(1): 27–48.
25.
GioiaDAChittipeddiK (1991) Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal12(6): 433–448.
26.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) Ch. 5: The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
27.
HarrisR (1989) How does writing restructure thought?Language & Communication9(2–3): 99–106.
28.
HoggMA (2000) Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology11(1): 223–255.
29.
HoggMATerryDI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25(1): 121–140.
30.
Howard-GrenvilleJMetzgerMLMeyerAD (2013) Rekindling the flame: Processes of identity resurrection. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 113–136.
31.
IbarraH (2003) Working Identity: Unconventional Strategies for Reinventing Your Career. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
JansenKJShippAJ (2019) Fitting as a temporal sensemaking process: Shifting trajectories and stable themes. Human Relations72(7): 1154–1186.
33.
LangleyA (1999) Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review24(4): 691–710.
McKinleyWSchererAG (2000) Some unanticipated consequences of organizational restructuring. Academy of Management Review25(4): 735–752.
36.
MaitlisS (2009) Who am I now? Sensemaking and identity in posttraumatic growth. In: Morgan RobertsLDuttonJE (eds) Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations: Building a Theoretical and Research Foundation. New York: Psychology Press, 47–76.
37.
MaitlisS (2012) Posttraumatic growth: A missed opportunity for positive organizational scholarship. In: SpreitzerGMCameronKS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 909–923.
38.
MaitlisSChristiansonM (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals8(1): 57–125.
39.
MaitlisSSonensheinS (2010) Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies47(3): 551–580.
40.
MellahiKWilkinsonA (2010) Managing and coping with organizational failure: Introduction to the Special Issue. Group and Organization Management35(5): 531–541.
41.
NagRCorleyKGGioiaDA (2007) The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal50(4): 821–847.
42.
OregS (2006) Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology15(1): 73–101.
43.
OregSBersonY (2011) Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributed and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology64(3): 627–659.
44.
OregSSverdlikN (2011) Ambivalence toward imposed change: The conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent. Journal of Applied Psychology96(2): 337–349.
45.
OregSBartunekJMLeeG, et al. (2018) An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review43(1): 65–86.
46.
OregSMichelAByRT (eds) (2013) The Psychology of Organizational Change: Viewing Change from the Employee’s Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
OregSVakolaMArmenakisA (2011) Change recipients’ reactions to organizational change: A 60-year review of quantitative studies. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science47(4): 461–524.
48.
PazzagliaFFarrellMSonparK, et al. (2018) Keeping up with the Joneses: Industry rivalry, commitment to frames and sensemaking failures. Human Relations71(3): 427–455.
49.
Peticca-HarrisA (2019) Managing compassionately? Managerial narratives about grief and compassion. Human Relations72(3): 588–612.
50.
PetriglieriJL (2011) Under threat: Responses to and the consequences of threats to individuals’ identities. Academy of Management Review36(4): 641–662.
51.
PrattMGRockmannKWKaufmannJB (2006) Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal49(2): 235–262.
52.
RedmanTSnapeEWassJ, et al. (2007) Evaluating the human resource shared services model: Evidence from the NHS. International Journal of Human Resource Management18(8): 1486–1506.
53.
RozinPRoyzmanEB (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review5(4): 296–320.
54.
SandbergJTsoukasH (2015) Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior36(S1): S6–S32.
55.
ShepherdDACardonMS (2009) Negative emotional reactions to project failure and the self-compassion to learn from the experience. Journal of Management Studies46(6): 923–949.
56.
ShepherdDAWilliamsTA (2018) Hitting rock bottom after job loss: Bouncing back to create a new positive work identity. Academy of Management Review43(1): 28–49.
57.
ShippAJColeMS (2015) Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often?Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behaviour2(1): 237–260.
58.
SimpsonAFitzgeraldT (2014) Professional knowledge workers: Tensions and binaries. In: Advancing Knowledge in Higher Education: Universities in Turbulent Times. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 26–43.
59.
SlayHSSmithDA (2011) Professional identity construction: Using narrative to understand the negotiation of professional and stigmatized cultural identities. Human Relations64(1): 85–107.
60.
SonensheinS (2010) We’re changing – or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal53(3): 477–512.
61.
StraussACorbinJM (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
62.
StuttsNBBarkerRT (1999) The use of narrative paradigm theory in assessing audience value conflict in image advertising. Management Communication Quarterly13(2): 209–244.
63.
Van KnippenbergDVan KnippenbergBMondenL, et al. (2002) Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology41(2): 233–252.
64.
Van MaanenJ (1979) The fact of fiction in organizational ethnography. Administrative Science Quarterly24(4): 539–550.
65.
VoughH (2012) Not all identifications are created equal: Exploring employee accounts for workgroup, organizational, and professional identification. Organization Science23(3): 778–800.
66.
VoughHCCazaBB (2017) Where do I go from here? Sensemaking and the construction of growth-based stories in the wake of denied promotions. Academy of Management Review42(1): 103–128.
67.
VoughHCBatailleCDNohSC, et al. (2015) Going off script: How managers make sense of the ending of their careers. Journal of Management Studies52(3): 414–440.
68.
WalshIJPazzagliaFErgeneE (2019) Loyal after the end: Understanding organizational identification in the wake of failure. Human Relations72(2): 163–187.
69.
WeickKE (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations (vol. 3). London: SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
