The study reported here employed a 2 (wheelchair-bound versus non-wheelchair-bound) x 2 (Caucasian versus Chinese) x 2 (programmer versus computer operator) full factorial experiment design to examine the effects of evaluator biases on the perceived employability of job applicants. Results based on 640 evaluation reports showed that evaluators tended to accord higher employability ratings to job applicants with apparent physical disabilities and those with a higher level of job skill. The positive bias in favor of applicants with disabilities in terms of perceived employability was greater for Caucasian than for Chinese job applicants. These results suggested that there might be race-disability interactions in the evaluation process. Implications for research on employment discrimination were discussed.
Adams, E.F.1978. A multivariate study of perceptions of and attitudes toward minority and majority managers. Journal of Applied Psychology63: 277-88.
2.
Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein.1977. Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychology Bulletin84: 888-918.
3.
Anderson, R.L. and R.F. Antonak.1992. The influence of attitudes and contact on reactions to persons with physical and speech disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin35: 240-7.
4.
Arvey, R.D.1979. Unfair discrimination in the employment interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin86: 736-65.
5.
Barr, S.H. and M.A. Hitt.1986. A comparison of selection decision models in manager versus student samples. Personnel Psychology39: 599-617.
6.
Belgrave, F.Z. and J. Mills.1981. Effect upon desire for social interaction with a physically disabled person of mentioning the disability in different contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology11: 44-57.
7.
Bernstein, V., M.D. Hakel and A. Harlan.1975. The college student as interviewer: A threat to generalizability? Journal of Applied Psychology60: 266-8.
8.
Biogness, W.J.1976. Effect of applicant's race, sex, and performance, on employer's performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology61: 80-4.
9.
Brewer, M.B. and R.M. Kramer.1985. The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Psychology36: 219-43.
Cesare, S.J., R.J. Tannenbaum and A. Dalessio.1988. Contrast effects for black, white, male, and female interviewees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology18: 1261-73.
12.
Cesare, S.J., R.J. Tannenbaum and A. Dalessio.1990. Interviewers' decisions related to applicant handicap type and rater empathy. Human Performance3(3): 157-71.
13.
Christie, R. and F.L. Geis.1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
14.
Cleveland, J.N. and RJLandy.1983. The effects of person and job stereotypes on two personnel decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology68: 609-19.
15.
Colella, A.1996. The organizational socialization of employees with disabilities: Theory and research. In Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 14, ed. G.R. Ferris, 351-417. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16.
Colella, A., A.S. DeNisi and A. Varma.1998. The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability-job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology83(1): 102-11.
17.
Consiggliere, S.1998. Some critical IT skills lacking. Straits Times 11 June: 1.
18.
Crowne, D.P. and D. Marlowe.1964. The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
19.
Czajka, J.M. and A.S. DeNisi .1988. Effects of emotional disability and clear performance standards on performance ratings. Academy of Management Journal31: 394-404.
20.
Dipboye, R.L.1985. Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. Academy of Management Review10: 116-27.
21.
Drehmer, D.E. and J.E. Bordieri.1986. Cause of disability and the selection evaluations of handicapped job applicants. Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, IL.
22.
Edwards, A.L.1957. The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden Press .
23.
Ehrenberg, R.G. and R.S. Smith.1982. Modern Labor Economics. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
24.
Farina, A., M. Sherman and J.G. Allen.1968. Role of physical abnormalities in interpersonal perception and behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology73: 590-3.
25.
Fisher, C.D., L.F. Schoenfeldt and J.B. Shaw.1999. Human resource management, 4th edn. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
26.
Fujimoto, Y., C.E.J. Härtel, G.F. Härtel and N.J. Baker.2000. Openness to dissimilarity moderates the consequences of diversity in well-established groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources38(3): 46-63.
27.
Gibbons, F.X., W.G. Stephan, B. Stephenson and C.R. Petty.1980. Reactions to stigmatized others: Response amplification vs. sympathy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology16:591-605.
28.
Goffman, E.1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
29.
Greenwood, R. and V.A. Johnson.1987. Employer perspectives on workers with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation53: 37-46.
30.
Gwartney, J.D. and J.E. Long.1978. The relative earnings of blacks and other minorities. Industrial and Labor Relations Review31: 336-46.
31.
Haefner, J.E.1977a. Race, age, sex and competence as factors in employer selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology62: 199-202.
32.
Haefner, J.E.1977b. Sources of discrimination among employees: A survey investigation . Journal of Applied Psychology62: 265-70.
33.
Hahn, H.1988. The politics of physical differences: Disability and discrimination . Journal of Social Issues44: 39-47.
34.
Hamilton, D.L.1976. Cognitive biases in the perception of social groups . In Cognition and social behavior, eds J.S. Caroll and J.W Payne, 81-93. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Hamilton, D.L.1981a. Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
36.
Hamilton, D.L.1981b. Illusory correlation as a basis for stereotyping . In Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior , ed. D.L. Hamilton, 115-44. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
37.
Harasymiw, S.W., M.D. Horne and S.C. Lewis.1976. A longitudinal study of disability group acceptance. Rehabilitation Literature37: 98-102.
38.
Hartel, C.E.J., S. Douthitt, G.F. Härtel, and S. Douthitt.1999. Equally qualified but unequally perceived: General cultural openness as a predictor of discriminatory performance ratings . Human Resource Development Quarterly10(1): 79-89.
39.
Hastorf, A.H., G.B. Northcraft and S.R. Picciotto.1979. Helping the handicapped: How realistic is the performance feedback received by the physically handicapped? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin5: 373-6.
40.
Heilman, M.E. and M.H. Stopeck.1985. Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage? Performance-based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes35: 202-15.
41.
Higgins, E.T. and J.A. Bargh.1987. Social cognition and social perception . Annual Review of Psychology38: 369-425.
42.
Huffcutt, A.I. and PLRoth.1998. Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations . Journal of Applied Psychology83: 179-89..
43.
Johnson, R. and L.W. Heal.1976. Private employment agency responses to the physically handicapped applicant in a wheelchair. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling7: 12-21.
44.
Jones, E.E., A. Farina, A.H. Hastorf, H. Markus, D.T. Miller, R.A. Scott and R. de Sales-French .1984. Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.
45.
Jones, R.L. and S.L. Guskin.1984. Attitudes and attitude change in special education. In Attitude and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice, ed. R.L. Jones, 1-20. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
46.
Katz, I.1979. Some thoughts about the stigma notion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin5: 447-60.
47.
Kim, P.S. and G.B. Lewis.1997. Asian Americans in the federal service: Education, occupational choice, and perceptions of discrimination: A reply . Public Administration Review57(3): 267-9.
Kleck, R.1968. Physical stigma and nonverbal cues emitted in face to face interaction. Human Relations21: 19-28.
50.
Kleck, R.E., H. Ono and A.H. Hastorf.1966. The effects of physical deviance upon face to face interaction. Human Relations19: 44-54.
51.
Kraiger, K. and J.K. Ford.1983. A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, California.
52.
Krefting, L.A. and A.P. Brief.1976. The impact of applicant disability on evaluative judgements in the selection process. Academy of Management Journal19: 675-80.
53.
Lerner, M.J.1980. The belief of a just world: A fundamental delusion . New York: Plenum Press.
54.
Levitan, S.A. and R. Taggart.1977. Employment problems of disabled persons . Monthly Labor Review100: 3-13.
55.
Levitin, T., R.P. Quinn and G.L. Staines.1971. Sex discrimination against the American working women. American Behavioral Scientist15: 238-54.
56.
McDonald, T. and M.D. Hakel.1985. Effects of applicant race, sex, suitability, and answers on interviewer's questioning strategy and ratings. Personnel Psychology38: 321-34.
57.
McGovern, T.V., B.W. Jones and S.E. Morri.1979. Comparison of professional versus student ratings of job interviewee behavior. Journal of Counseling Psychology26: 176-9.
58.
McIntyre, S., D.J. Moberg and B.Z. Posner.1980. Preferential treatment in preselection decisions according to sex and race. Academy of Management Journal23: 738-49.
59.
Miller, M.1992. The effects of disability-related information on employment decisions regarding persons with disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , University of Oregon.
60.
Ministry of Manpower. 2000. http://www.filmo.com/sgwklife.htm#Population :.
61.
Mullins, T.W.1978. Racial attitudes and the selection interview: A factorial experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston.
62.
Mullins, T.W.1982. Interviewer decisions as a function of applicant race, applicant quality and interviewer prejudice. Personnel Psychology35: 163-74.
63.
National Productivity Board and Singapore Institute of Personnel Management.1991.1990 Survey on human resource management practices in Singapore. Singapore: National Productivity Board and Singapore Institute of Personnel Management .
64.
Newman, J.M. and F. Krzystofiak.1979. Self-reports versus unobtrusive measures: Balancing method variable and ethical concerns in employment discrimination research. Journal of Applied Psychology64: 82-5.
65.
Novak, P.W. and M.J. Lerner.1968. Rejection as a consequence of perceived similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology9: 147-52.
66.
Oliphant, V.N. and E.R. Alexander.1982. Reactions to resumes as a function of resume determinateness, applicant characteristics, and sex of raters. Personnel Psychology35: 829-42.
67.
Parsons, C.K. and R.C. Liden.1984. Interviewer perceptions of applicant qualifications: A multivariate field study of demographic characteristics and nonverbal cues. Journal of Applied Psychology69: 557-68.
68.
Pulakos, E.D., L.A. White, S.H. Oppler and W.C. Borman.1989. Examination of race and sex effects on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology74: 770-80.
69.
Rand, T.M. and K.N. Wexley.1975. Demonstration of the effect, 'similar to me', in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports36: 535-44.
70.
Report of the Advisory Council on the Disabled.1988. Opportunities for the disabled. Singapore : Ministry of Community Development.
71.
Rose, G.L. and A.R. Brief.1979. Effects of handicap and job characteristics on selection evaluations. Personnel Psychology32: 385-92.
72.
Satcher, J. and K. Dooley-Dickey .1992. Attitudes of human-resource management students toward persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin35: 248-52.
73.
Scheier, M.F., C.S. Carver, R. Schultz, D.C. Glass and I. Katz.1978. Sympathy, self-consciousness and reaction to the stigmatized. Journal of Applied Social Psychology8: 270-82.
74.
Schein, V.E.1973. The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology57: 95-100.
75.
Schmitt, N. and T.E. Hill.1977. Sex and race composition of assessment center groups as a determinant of peer and assessor ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology62: 428-35.
76.
Schwab, D. and H. Heneman.1978. Age stereotyping in performance appraisal . Journal of Applied Psychology63: 573-8.
77.
Shaw, E.A.1972. Differential impact of negative stereotyping in employee selection. Personnel Psychology25: 333-8.
78.
Sherman, S.J., C.M. Judd and B. Park.1989. Social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 40 (eds M.R. Rosenzweig and L.W. Porter): 281-326.
79.
Stone, D.L. and A. Colella.1996. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Academy of Management Review21: 352-401.
80.
Stone, C. and B. Sawatzki.1980. Hiring bias and the disabled intervierwee: Effects of manipulated work history and disability information of the disabled job applicant. Journal of Vocational Behavior16: 96-104.
81.
Stone, E.F., D.L. Stone and R.L. Dipboye.1992. Stigmas in organizations: Race, handicaps, and physical attractiveness. In Issues, theory, and research in industrial and organizational psychology, ed. K. Kelley, 385-444. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
82.
Straits Times. 1995. Give disabled the chance to contribute to Singapore's future. 16 February: 30.
83.
Straits Times. 1999a. She started it: Letters in Forum page create a stir. 22 February.
Straits Times. 2001. The elderly - As fine as aged wine. 12 January.
95.
Tagalakis, V., R. Amsel and C.S. Fichten.1988. Job interview strategies for people with a visible disability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology18: 520-32.
96.
US Merit Systems Protection Board.1994. Working for America: An update. Washington, DC : US Government Printing Office.
97.
Weigel, R.H. and P.W. Howes.1985. Conceptions of racial prejudice: Symbolic racism reconsidered. Journal of Social Issues41: 117-38.
