Abstract
A recent literature in macroeconomics argues that instead of commercial banks taking in deposits from savers to fund loans, lending itself actually creates deposits. This outcome has been interpreted as lending creating deposits out of thin air or merely because of accounting. I argue that neither interpretation satisfactorily explains the outcome. Rather, I show that a hitherto forgotten explanation from two late nineteenth and early twentieth century scholars can easily demonstrate how lending creates deposits.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
