This article focuses on the role of accounting in governance arrangements. The French context is marked by the inexistence of external governance mechanisms and by the total lack of effectiveness of independent auditing. Therefore, the objective of this article is to shed light on the internal governance mechanisms implemented by the leading French aluminium producer during the inter-war period and the role played by accounting in this implementation. On the basis of the archives of the Compagnie Alais, Froges et Camargue (AFC) between 1921 and 1939, it appears that in a context marked by very strong external growth, management strengthened financial reporting systems and internal control procedures. In addition, the directors used the financial statements as early as 1923 to determine the financial effort of the AFC group and to measure the flows intended to finance the group’s material and financial investments. Accounting is unquestionably at the heart of AFC’s internal governance mechanisms.
AllaisM (1938) L’unification des bilans. L’Orga. 78: 247–251.
2.
AndersonM (1965) The myth of the two hundred families. Political Studies13(2): 163–178.
3.
AxtellJSmithMTervoW (2017) The advent of accounting in business governance: From ancient scribes to modern practitioners. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics12(1): 21–46.
4.
BarjotD (1999) Les firmes et leur financement: le cas de quatre grandes entreprises de travaux publics entre les deux guerres. Entreprise et Histoire22(2): 104–121.
5.
BarjotD (2016) Existe-t-il un modèle français de la grande entreprise?Revue française d’histoire économique6(2): 90–113.
6.
BensadonD (2010) Les comptes de groupe en France: origines, enjeux et pratiques de la consolidation des comptes. Rennes: PUR.
7.
BensadonD (2015) The adoption of an accounting innovation in France: The case of consolidated financial statements at Pechiney (1956-1971). Accounting History20(3): 288–309.
8.
BerleAMeansG (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: The Macmillan Company.
9.
BoltanskiL (1982) Les cadres. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
10.
BourdieuP (1989) La Noblesse d’État. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
11.
BourguignonFLevy-LeboyerM (1985) L’économie française au XIXe siècle. Analyse macro-économique. Paris: Éditions Economica.
12.
BouvierY (2015) Connexions électriques. Technologies, hommes et marchés dans les relations entre la Compagnie générale délectricité et l’Etat, 1898-1992. Bruxelles: Peter Lang.
13.
BrennanNMSolomonJ (2008) Corporate governance, accountability and mechanisms of accountability: An overview. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal21(7): 885–906.
14.
BuckTTullM (2000) Anglo-American contributions to Japanese and German corporate governance after World War II. Business History42(2): 119–140.
15.
CadburyA (1992) The financial aspects of corporate governance. Cadbury report, The Committee on the Financial Aspect of Corporate Governance (The Cadbury Committee) and Gee and Co, Ltd, London, May.
16.
CailluetL (1995) Stratégies, structures d’organisation et pratiques de gestion de Pechiney des années 1880 À 1971. PhD Thesis, University of Lyon, Lyon.
17.
CailluetL (1997) Accounting and accountants as essential elements in the development of central administration during the inter-war period management ideology and technology at Alais, Froges et Camargue. Accounting, Business & Financial History7(3): 295–314.
18.
CarsonE (2002) Factors associated with the development of board sub-committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review10(1): 4–18.
19.
CartierA (2011) Lafarge: De l’entreprise familiale à la multinationale (1880-1947). PhD Thesis, École nationale des Chartes, Paris.
20.
CattaE (1990) Victor de Metz: De la CFP au groupe total. Paris: Teva.
21.
ChadeauE (1993) The large family firm in twentieth-century France. Business History35(4): 184–205.
22.
ChungKHKimJSParkKSungT (2012) Corporate governance, legal system, and stock market liquidity: Evidence around the world. Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies41(6): 686–703.
23.
CourcierasC (2017) Poliet et Chausson (1901-1971): Ascension et déclin d’une grande entreprise cimentière française. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
24.
DalmassoA (2010) Les entreprises grenobloises de matériel hydrauliques (1854-1977). Tenure Thesis, University d’Aix-Marseille I, Marseille.
25.
DaumasJC (ed.) (2010) Dictionnaire historique des patrons français. Paris: Flammarion.
26.
DockèsP (1993) Les recettes fordistes et les marmites de l’histoire (formation et transferts des paradigmes socio-techniques). Revue Économique44(3): 485–528.
27.
FabreK (2009) De la diversité des pratiques comptables à l’objet de la comptabilité: le cas de l’Air liquide (1902-1939). Entreprises et Histoire4(57): 96–110.
28.
FabreKNogatchewskyGOxibarB (2015) Modes de financement et comptabilisation des immatériels: une approche historique de la gestion du résultat. Comptabilité – Contrôle – Audit21(3): 149–176.
29.
FearJKobrakC (2006) Diverging paths: Accounting for corporate governance in America and Germany. Business History Review80(1): 1–48.
30.
Fournès-DattinC (2014) The practice of statutory auditing in France (1867-1935): The case of Pont-à-Mousson and Saint-Gobain companies. Accounting History19(3): 351–368.
31.
FortinA (1991) The 1947 Accounting Plan: Origines and influences on subsequent practice. The Accounting Historians Journal18(2): 1–23.
32.
FridensonP (1997) France: The relatively slow development of big business in the twentieth century. In: ChandlerADJrAmatoriFHikinoT (eds) Big Business and the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 207–245.
33.
GégoutM (1929) Filiales et groupements de sociétés. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
34.
GiquelP (2014) La Compagnie des Compteurs: Acteur et témoin des mutations industrielles du XXe siècle (1872-1987). Rennes: PUR.
35.
GomezP-Y (2003) Jalons pour une histoire des théories du gouvernement des entreprises. Finance Contrôle Stratégie6(4): 183–208.
36.
GramlingAAMalettaMJSchneiderAChurchBK (2004) The role of the internal audit function in corporate governance: A synthesis of the extant internal auditing literature and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature23(1): 194–244.
37.
GuestPM (2009) The impact of board size on firm performance: Evidence from the UK. European Journal of Finance15(4): 385–404.
38.
HansmannH (1988) Ownership of the firm. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization4(2): 267–304.
39.
HautcoeurPC (1994) Le marché boursier et le financement des entreprises françaises (1890-1939). PhD Thesis, University Panthéon-Sorbonne, Paris.
40.
HorsthuisL (2019) Internal corporate governance mechanisms and corporate performance: Evidence from Dutch listed firms. PhD Thesis, University of Twente, AE Enschede.
41.
JolyH (2013) Diriger une grande entreprise au XXe siècle: l’élite industrielle française. Tours: Presses universitaires François-Rabelais.
42.
JonesMJ (2008) Internal control, accountability and corporate governance Medieval and modern Britain compared. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal21(7): 1052–1075.
43.
KogutB (1998) Evolution of the large firm in France in comparative perspective. Entreprises et histoire19: 113–152.
44.
La PortaRLópez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance54(2): 471–517.
45.
LemarchandY (1993) The dark side of the result: Self-financing and accounting choices within nineteenth-century French industry. Accounting, Business and Financial History3(3): 303–325.
46.
LemarchandY (1995) 1880-1914, l’échec de l’unification des bilans. Le rendez-vous manqué de la normalisation. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit1(1): 7–24.
47.
Lévy-LeboyerM (1980) The large corporation in modern France. In: ChandlerADJrDaemsH (eds) Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 117–160.
48.
Lloyds-JonesRLewisMMatthewsMDMaltbyJ (2005) Control, conflict and concession: Corporate governance, accounting and accountability at Birmingham small arms, 1906-1933. Accounting Historians Journal32(1): 149–184.
49.
MacLeanM (1999) Corporate Governance in France and UK: Long term perspectives on contemporary institutional arrangements. Business History41(1): 88–116.
50.
MayerM (1900) Le secret des affaires. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
51.
MurphyAE (2005) Corporate ownership in France: The importance of history. In: MorckRK (ed.) A History of Corporate Governance around the World: Family Business Groups to Professional Managers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 185–222.
52.
OuriemmiO (2014) Formes de problématisation de l’uniformisation des comptabilités (1879-1947): La naissance de la normalisation comptable française. PhD Thesis, University of Nantes, Nantes.
53.
PedersenTThomsenS (2003) Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance7(1): 27–55.
54.
PercerouA (1932) Lois actuelles et projets récents en matière de sociétés par actions (Allemagne, Angleterre, Italie). PhD Thesis, Law University of Paris, Paris.
55.
PraquinN (2012) Commercial legislation and the emergence of corporate auditing in France, 1856-1935. Accounting History Review22(2): 161–189.
56.
RamirezC (2001) Understanding social closure in its cultural context: Accounting practitioners in France (1920 – 1939). Accounting, Organization and Society26(4–5): 391–418.
57.
RichardJ (2012) The victory of the Prussian railway ‘dynamic’ accounting over the public finance and patrimonial accounting models (1838-1884): An early illustration of the appearance of the second stage of capitalist financial accounting and a testimony against the agency and the market for excuses theories. The Accounting Historians Journal39(1): 91–126.
58.
RodriguesLLRicardinoATortelboom Aversari MartinsS (2009) Corporate governance regulations: A new term for an ancient concern? The case of Grão Pará and Maranhão General Trading Company in Portugal (1754). Accounting History14(4): 405–435.
59.
RossetP-R (1933) Traité théorique et pratique des sociétés financières: ‘holdings companies et investment trusts’. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
60.
SaintonP (1938) Sociétés mères et filiales: contribution à l’étude du régime juridique des sociétés de capitaux. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
61.
ShleiferAVishnyRW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of FinanceLII(2): 737–787.
62.
StanworthPGiddensA (1974) An economic elite: A demographic profile of company chairman. In: StanworthPGiddensA (eds) Elites and Power in British Society. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–102.
63.
TchernoffJ (1933) Ententes économiques et financières: Cartels, Syndicats, Trusts, Holding devant les lois. PhD Thesis, University of Paris, Paris.
64.
ThomsenSPedersenT (2000) Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal705(January): 689–705.
65.
TouchelayB (2005) Les professionnels de la comptabilité vus par les Administrations fiscales françaises des années 1920 aux années 1960: Experts, faussaires ou charlatans ?Entreprises et histoire39: 59–76.
66.
TouchelayB (2011) L’État et l’entreprise. Une histoire de la normalisation comptable et fiscale à la française. Rennes: PUR.
67.
ToussaintP (1950) La compagnie de produits chimiques et électrométallurgiques Alais, Froges et Camargues des origines à 1926. Paris: IHA.
68.
Van EesHVan Der LaanGPostmaTJBM (2008) Effective board behavior in The Netherlands. European Management Journal26(2): 84–93.
69.
VuillermotC (2014) Les groupes industriels français: Réalités et représentations (des années 1920 aux années 1980 à partir des exemples de Saint-Gobain, Pont-à-mousson et Schneider). Habilitation à diriger des recherches. University of Paris Sorbonne IV, France.
70.
WalkerSP (2016) Revisiting the roles of accounting in society. Accounting, Organizations and Society Tome49: 41–50.
71.
WhittingtonG (1993) Corporate governance and the regulation of financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research23(9): 311–319.
72.
ZimnovitchH (1997) The development of standard costing at SaintGobain, 1920-60: Forty years of quarantine?Accounting, Business & Financial History7(3): 345–365.
73.
ZimnovitchH (1999) Etat et calcul des coûts par les entreprises françaises: L’exemple de Pechiney 1936-1945. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit5(1): 5–27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
