Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-11
Lucien Bailly (1871–1940): An eccentric troublemaker and a real precursor. A short story of shareholders’ activism in France at the beginning of the twentieth century
The article highlights the role of an eccentric troublemaker at the beginning of the twentieth century – Lucien Bailly. The Pont-à-Mousson company’s archives, one of the major joint stock companies in the mining industry at that time, provide a wealth of information about this very interesting character. It is argued that Lucien Bailly paved the way for present-day activism. While the nature of shareholder-activists is far different today, there is a similar dichotomy between private and public or cooperative and hostile actions. This is the true legacy of Lucien Bailly. He was also the pioneer of proxy fights with the creation of the first association defending minority shareholders and the precursor of social activism.
AlbouyMSchattA (2004) Les prises de contrôle par les actionnaires contestataires: le cas André. Finance Contrôle Stratégie7(2): 33–65.
2.
AlbouyMSchattA (2009) Activisme et proxy fight: quand les actionnaires déclarent la guerre au management. Revue Française de Gestion198–199: 297–315.
3.
BaillyL (1930) Défense des actionnaires et finance minière. Nancy: Société Financière de l’Est.
4.
BerleAMeansG (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.
5.
CatasúsBJohedG (2007) Annual general meetings – Rituals of closure or ideal speech situations? A dual analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management23(2): 168–190.
6.
ClémentJC (2006) Le rôle des batailles de procuration. PhD Thesis, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
7.
CrossleyN (2003) Even newer social movements? Anti-corporate protests, capitalist crises and the remoralization of society. Organization10(2): 287–305.
8.
EtzioniA (1988) The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: The Free Press.
9.
Fournès DattinC (2014) The practice of statutory auditing in France (1867–1935): The case of Pont-à-Mousson and Saint Gobain companies. Accounting History19(3): 351–368.
10.
Fournès DattinC (2015) La mise en place d’organes de contrôle dans un environnement non contraint: censeurs, commissaires, contrôleurs et inspecteurs des sociétés anonymes autorisées. Gérer et Comprendre121: 73–86.
11.
GillanSLStarksLT (2007) The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance19(1): 55–73.
12.
GirardC (2001) Une typologie de l’activisme des actionnaires minoritaires en France. Finance, Contrôle, Stratégie4(32): 123–146.
13.
GirardCLe MauxJ (2007) L’activisme et l’engagement actionnarial. Revue Française de Gouvernance d’Entreprise1: 113–132.
14.
GoranovaMVerstegen RyanL (2014) Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management40(5): 1230–1268.
15.
Hardy-HémeryO (2001) Le pouvoir dans l’entreprise: actionnaires et dirigeants dans les sociétés du Nord, 1880–1960. Revue d’Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine4(48–4): 77–101.
16.
HuynhQT (2010) Les déterminants de l’activisme des actionnaires minoritaires: insuffisance de gouvernance affichée ou de résultats financiers ?Finance Contrôle Stratégie13(3): 127–146.
17.
JensenMCMecklingWH (1976) Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics3: 305–360.
18.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance54(2): 471–517.
19.
Le MauxJ (2003) L’activisme: une protection active des actionnaires minoritaires. Recherches Récentes en Finance (CREFIB-SORBONNE) 1: 14–55.
20.
LemarchandYPraquinN (2005) Falsifications et manipulations comptables: la mesure du profit, un enjeu social (1856–1914). Comptabilité Contrôle Audit11: 15–34.
21.
MarensR (2002) Inventing corporate governance: The mid-century emergence of shareholder activism. Journal of Business and Management8(4): 365–389.
22.
MarensR (2003) Evolution du gouvernement des entreprises: l’émergence de l’activisme actionnarial au milieu du XXème siècle. Finance Contrôle Stratégie6(4): 97–131.
23.
MohnT (2017) Shareholder meetings: Unearthing the history. Directors and Boards41(4): 22.
24.
PargendlerMHansmannH (2013) A new view of shareholder voting in the nineteenth century: Evidence from Brazil, England and France. Business History55(4): 582–597.
25.
RehbeinKWaddockSGravesS (2004) Understanding shareholder activism: Which corporations are targeted?Business and Society43(3): 239–267.
26.
RivoliP (1995) Ethical aspects of investor behavior. Journal of Business Ethics14: 265–277.
27.
RowleyTJMoldoveanuM (2003) When will stakeholders groups act? An interest and identity based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review28(2): 204–219.
28.
RutterfordJ (2012) The shareholder voice: British and American accents, 1890–1965. Enterprise and Society13(1): 120–153.
29.
TouchelayB (2005) Les professionnels de la comptabilité vus par les administrations fiscales françaises des années 1920 aux années 1960: Experts, faussaires ou charlatans?Entreprises et Histoire2(39): 59–76.
30.
Verstegen RyanLSchneiderM (2002) The antecedents of institutional investor activism. Academy of Management Review27(4): 554–573.
