Academic publications on the adoption of accounting innovations, such as consolidated accounts, have primarily focused on countries that use accounting methods developed in the USA, Australia and the UK. This article examines why Pechiney, a French company of international standing, adopted consolidated accounts in France during the 1960s. The findings indicate that Pechiney, aware that the production of consolidated financial statements was one of the criteria for acceptance, opted for consolidation in a bid to ensure that the company would be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. But this was not the only motivation. Firstly, Pechiney’s board of directors wanted to strengthen the parent company’s control over its subsidiaries by imposing consolidation procedures. Secondly, by acquiring expertise in the domain, the board hoped to exert substantial influence over the Conseil national de la comptabilité (French accounting standards authority) as and when this body was ready to introduce financial consolidation regulations.
AkrichMCallonMLatourB (1988) A quoi tient le succès des innovations. Premier épisode: l’art de l’intéressement. Gérer et comprendre11(6): 4–17.
2.
AlcouffeSGuedriZ (2008) The role of communication channels and perceived innovation characteristics within the adoption process of Activity-Based-Costing. Comptabilité-Contrôle-Audit, Special Issue: 39–66.
3.
AlcouffeSBerlandNLevantY (2008) Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study. Management Accounting Research19(1): 1–17.
ArchavlisE (1954) Les bilans consolidés. Bulletin de la Société de Comptabilité de France137: 69–83.
6.
BensadonD (2011) Organisational analysis and management tools at Pechiney Ugine Kuhlmann: The audit and consolidated accounts department’s “grey brochure” (1971–1982). Journal for the History of Aluminium44–45: 121–137.
7.
BircherP (1988) The adoption of consolidated accounting in Great Britain. Accounting and Business Research19(73): 3–13.
8.
BjørnenakT (1997) Diffusion and accounting: The case of ABC in Norway. Management Accounting Research8(1): 3–17.
CailluetL (1997) Accounting and accountants as essential elements in the development of central administration during the inter-war period management ideology and technology at Alais, Froges et Camargue. Accounting, Business & Financial History7(3): 295–314.
11.
CamffermanKZeffSA (2003) The apotheosis of holding company accounting: Unilever’s financial reporting innovations from the 1920s to the 1940s. Accounting, Business & Financial History13(2): 171–206.
12.
CharlesPAlii (1956) Bilans consolidés (généralités, Stocks, Cas concrets). Bulletin de la Société de Comptabilité de France151: 85–111.
13.
ChenhallRHLangfield-SmithK (1998) Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: An Australian study case. Management Accounting Research9(1): 1–19.
14.
ComiskeyEEGrovesRE (1971) The adoption and diffusion of an accounting innovation. Accounting and Business Research2(5): 67–77.
15.
Commission des Opérations de Bourse (COB) (1968) Rapport annuel au Président de la République. Report, Paris, France.
16.
Commission des Opérations de Bourse (COB) (1969) Rapport annuel au Président de la République. Report, Paris, France.
17.
Conseil Economique et Social (1965) Consolidation des bilans, étude présentée par la section des Finances, du Crédit et de la Fiscalité à partir du rapport de François-Maurice Richard. Report, Paris, France.
18.
Conseil National de la Comptabilité (1968), Consolidation des bilans et des comptes. Report, Paris, France.
19.
Conseil National du Patronat Français (1969) Etude sur les comptes consolidés. Report, Paris, France.
20.
CooperR (1998) A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation. Management Decision36 (8): 493–502.
21.
Crédit Industriel et Commercial (CIC) (1968) Note du 15 mars 1968.
22.
DamanpourF (1996) Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: Effects of contingency factors, industrials sectors, and innovations characteristics. Journal of High Technology Management Research7(2): 150–174.
23.
DattinC (2013) Independence and competence, recurring issues in auditing: The French case (1867–1966). In: The Seventh Accounting History International conference, Sevilla, Spain, 25–27 September 2013.
24.
DewarRDDuttonJE (1986) The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science32(11): 1422–1433.
25.
EdwardsJR (1985) The origins and evolution of the double account system: An example of accounting innovation. Abacus31(1): 19–43.
26.
EdwardsJR (1991) The process of accounting innovation: The publication of consolidated accounts in Britain in 1910. The Accounting Historians Journal18(2): 113–132.
27.
EdwardsJRBoynsT (1992) Industrial organization and accounting innovation: Charcoal ironmaking in England 1690–1783. Management Accounting Research3: 151–169.
28.
EdwardsJRWebbK (1984) The development of group accounting in the United Kingdom to 1933. The Accounting Historians Journal11(1): 31–57.
29.
FainB (1954) Les comptes consolidés des sociétés apparentées. Economie et comptabilité8: 55–95.
30.
FridensonP (1997) France: The relatively slow development of big business in the twentieth century. In: ChandlerADJrAmatoriFHikinoT (eds) Big Business and the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.207–245.
31.
GosselinM (1997) The effects of strategy and organizational structure on the adoption and implementation of Activity-Based-Costing. Accounting, Organizations and Society22(2): 105–122.
32.
GrinbergIMiocheP (1996) Aluminium de Grèce, l’usine aux trois rivages. Grenoble: Grenoble University Press.
33.
HusseinMEA (1981) The innovative process in financial accounting standards settings. Accounting, Organizations and Society6(1): 27–37.
34.
KanamoriE (2007) Some evidences of group accounting practices in the United Kingdom 1927–1951. The Ritsumeikan Business ReviewXLV(6): 41–71.
35.
KawamotoJ (2001) The development of group accounts disclosure system in Japan. Accounting, Business & Financial History11(3): 331–348.
36.
LarrueJ (1994) Fria en Guinée, première usine d’alumine en terre d’Afrique, des stratégies originelles de 1957 aux perspectives de l’an 2000. PhD Thesis, Panthéon-Sorbonne University, France.
37.
LesclousR (1997) Genèse et évolution des sites producteurs d’aluminium, essai d’interprétation des choix stratégiques de Pechiney et de leur mise en œuvre, 1893–1972. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines.
38.
LewisLKSeiboldDR (1993) Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Review18(2): 322–354.
39.
MalmiT (1999) Activity-Based Costing diffusion across organizations: An exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society24(8): 649–672.
40.
MikolA (1993) The evolution of auditing and the independent auditor in France. European Accounting Review2(1): 1–16.
41.
MillerP (1991) Accounting innovation beyond the enterprise: Problematizing investment decision and programming economic growth in the UK in the 1960s. Accounting, Organizations and Society16(8): 733–762.
42.
MoraAReesW (1998) The early adoption of consolidated accounting in Spain. European Accounting Review7(4): 675–696.
43.
Naranjo-GilDHartmannF (2007) Management accounting systems, top management team heterogeneity and strategic change. Accounting, Organizations and Society32(3): 735–756.
44.
Pain-SavanierR (1964) Pour une méthode générale d’établissement des comptes de groupes. unpublished.
45.
PezetA (1997) The development of discounted cash flow and profitability of investment in France in the 1960s. Accounting, Business and Financial History7(3): 367–380.
46.
RamirezC (2007) Exporting professional models: The expansion of the multinational audit firm and the transformation of the French accountancy profession since 1970. Working paper Cahier de Recherche HEC n° 864.
47.
RichardFMVeyrencA (1954) Les bilans consolidés, comptes de groupes d’entreprises: étude présentée au congrès de la Compagnie nationale des experts-comptables. Paris: Durassié et Cie.
48.
RogersEM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition.New York: Free Press.
49.
SchumpeterJA (1926) The Theory of Economic Development, 2nd edition.Cambridge: Harvard University.
50.
SchwingE (1937a) Bilans consolidés. Le Chef de comptabilité146: 188–191.
51.
SchwingE (1937b) Premières conditions pour pouvoir établir des “bilans consolidés”. La Comptabilité216: 558–560.
52.
SnozziE (1933) Le bilan consolidé. Les Affaires24: 497–509.
53.
SnozziE (1935) Le bilan consolidé. Les Affaires48: 404–413.
54.
WalkerRG (1978) Consolidated Statements: A History and Analysis. New York: Arno Press.
55.
WattelB (2001) Who’s Who in 20th-century France. Paris: Éditions Jacques Lafitte.
56.
WhittredG (1986) The evolution of consolidated financial reporting in Australia. Abacus22(2): 103–119.
57.
ZaltmanGDuncanRHolbeckJ (1973) Innovations and Organisations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
58.
001-10-20529: Senior management, finance and taxation, group holdings, 1965 to 1966.
59.
001-10-20530: Senior management, finance and taxation, consolidated balance sheet information, 1964 to 1968.
60.
001-10-20531: Senior management, finance and taxation, meetings w.r.t. consolidated balance sheet, 1961 to 1968.
61.
001-10-24607: Senior management, finance and taxation, consolidation of the balance sheets, 1966 to 1967.
62.
072-10-21968: Head office, senior management meeting minutes, 1954 to 1957.
63.
072-10-21971: Head office, senior management meeting minutes, 1964 to 1967.Doc 5 B 01 to B 20: Pechiney annual reports, 1950 to 1970.
