This paper proposes a framework for the historical analysis of judicial decisions in financial reporting that may provide a basis for comparative research in the historical relation between the law and accounting. It is suggested that contract law may have been the dominant legal domain in which such judicial decisions were taken. To illustrate the approach, an analysis is presented of the development of judicial decisions on financial reporting in the Netherlands from the late nineteenth century to the second half of the twentieth century. It is found that contract law provided the dominant frame of reference for financial reporting cases. The overall development of contract law explains why, in substance, it was difficult for interested parties to challenge accounting policy choice in court. A tentative comparative conclusion is that this substantive position was quite comparable to that arrived at in the UK, despite the different legal setting. Further research should investigate whether the predominance of a contract-law view of financial reporting led to greater similarities in the legal understanding of financial reporting across the civil-law/common-law divide than is commonly supposed.
AdrianiP.J.A. (1948), Het belastingrecht: zijn grondslagen en ontwikkeling, deel I, Amsterdam: Veen.
2.
AlexanderD.ArcherS. (2000), “On the Myth of ‘Anglo-Saxon’ Financial Accounting”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol.35, No.4, pp.539–57.
3.
ArdenM.H. (1992), “Accounting and the Law: A Legal Viewpoint”, in BromwichM.HopwoodA. (eds.), Accounting and the Law, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International, pp.76–82.
4.
ArdernD.AikenM. (2005), “An Accounting History of Capital Maintenance: Legal Precedents for Managerial Autonomy in the United Kingdom”, Accounting Historians Journal, Vol.32, No.1, June, pp.23–60.
5.
AsserC. (1993), Verbintenissenrecht, deel II Algemene Leer der Overeenkomsten, 9th edition, revised by A.S. Hartkamp, Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
6.
BallR. (2001), “Infrastructure Requirements for an Economically Efficient System of Public Financial Reporting and Disclosure”, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, pp.127–69.
7.
BallwieserW. (2010), “Germany”, in PrevitsG.. (eds.), A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp.59–88.
8.
BriefR.P. (1966), “The Origin and Evolution of Nineteenth-Century Asset Accounting”, Business History Review, Vol.40, No.1, pp.1–23.
9.
BryerR.A. (1998), “The Laws of Accounting in Late Nineteenth Century Britain”, Accounting History, Vol.3, No.1, pp.55–9.
10.
CamffermanK. (1994), “Goed koopmansgebruik en maatschappelijk aanvaardbare normen”, in BonecoC.M.T.. (eds.), FMA-Kroniek 1994, Rotterdam: Vakgroep Kosten- en Winstbepalingsvraagstukken, pp.183–98.
11.
CamffermanK. (2000), “Jaarrekeningpublicatie door beursgenoteerde naamloze vennootschappen in Nederland tot 1900”, NEHA Jaarboek, Vol.63, pp.71–103.
12.
CamffermanK. (2010), “The Netherlands” in PrevitsG.. (eds.), A Global History of Accounting, Financial Reporting and Public Policy: Europe, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp.107–37.
13.
ChoiF.D.S.MeekG.K. (2005), International Accounting, fifth (international) edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education International.
14.
ChorusJ.M.J.GerverP.H.M.HondiusE.H.KoekkoekA.K. (eds.) (1999), Introduction to Dutch Law, third edition, Den Haag: Kluwer Law International.
15.
CollinsH. (2003), The Law of Contract, fourth edition, n.p.: LexisNexis.
16.
DineJ. (1995), “Private Property and Corporate Governance Part II: Content of Directors’ Duties and Remedies”, in PatfieldF.M. (ed.), Perspectives on Company Law, Vol. 1, London: Kluwer Law International, pp.115–33.
17.
DingY.JeanjeanJ.StolowyH. (2005), “Why Do National GAAP Differ from IAS? The Role of Culture”, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol.40, pp.325–50.
18.
FarnsworthE.A. (2006), “Comparative Contract Law”, in ReimannM.ZimmermannR. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.899–935.
19.
FriedmanL.M. (1974), “Some General Considerations”, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Volume VII, Contracts in General, Chapter 2, “The Impact of Large Scale Business Enterprises Upon Contracts”, Tübingen: Mohr, pp.3–20.
20.
GeuljansK.M.H.L. (1888), “Aanteekening op art. 47, Wetboek van Koophandel”, doctoral thesis University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam: Kervel.
21.
GlennH.P. (2006), “Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions”, in ReimannM.ZimmermannR. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.421–40.
22.
GroenewegenN. (1907), Winstbepaling in het vennootschapsrecht, Amsterdam: M.J. Portielje.
23.
HansmannH.KraakmanR.H. (2000), “The End of History For Corporate Law”, Yale Law School Working Paper No. 235; NYU Working Paper No. 013; Harvard Law School Discussion Paper No. 280; Yale SOM Working Paper No. ICF–00-09. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=204528.
24.
HatfieldH.R. (1920), Modern Accounting: Its Principles and Some of its Problems, New York: D. Appleton & Company.
25.
HesselinkM.W. (1999), De redelijkheid en billijkheid in het Europese privaatrecht, Deventer: Kluwer.
26.
HonéeH.J.M.N. (1989), “De ontwikkeling van het vennootschapsrecht”, in 150 Jaar Wetboek van Koophandel: Het verleden en de toekomst, n.p: Kluwer, pp.35–43.
27.
JohnsonO. (1987), “Common Law Accounting: The Case of Goodwill”, Research in Accounting Regulation, pp.51–77.
28.
KlaassenJ. (1980), “An Accounting Court: The Impact of the Enterprise Chamber on Financial Reporting in the Netherlands”, The Accounting Review, Vol.55, No.2, April, pp.327–41.
29.
KleerekoperS. (1948), Grondbeginselen der Bedrijfseconomie, Vol. I, Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers.
30.
KoelemeijerM. (1999), Redelijkheid en billijkheid in kapitaalvennootschappen: Beschouwingen rond aandeelhouders en bestuurders in rechtsvergelijkend perspectief, Deventer: Kluwer.
31.
LambM. (2002), “Defining ‘Profits’ for British Income Tax Purposes: A Contextual Study of the Depreciation Cases: 1875–1897”, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol.29, No.1, July, pp.105–72.
32.
La PortaR.Lopez-de-SilanesF.ShleiferA.VishnyR.W. (1998), “Law and Finance”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.106, No.6, pp.1113–55.
33.
LimpergTh.L. (1968), Bedrijfseconomie, Vol. II, Leer van de Kostprijs, Deventer: Kluwer.
34.
LöwensteynF.J.W. (1978), Het rechtspersonenrecht, Arnhem: Gouda Quint.
35.
MaeijerJ.M.M. (1976), Vennootschapsrecht in Beweging, Alphen aan den Rijn: Samsom.
36.
MaeijerJ.M.M. (1984), “De corrigerende werking van de goede trouw, in het bijzonder binnen rechtspersonen”, in LuijtenE.A.A.. (eds.), Goed en trouw: Opstellen aangeboden aan Prof. mr. W.C.L. van der Grinten ter gelegenheid van zijn afscheid als hoogleraar aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink, pp.31–44.
37.
MaltbyJ. (2000), “Was the Companies Act 1947 a Response to a National Crisis?”, Accounting History, Vol.5, No.2, pp.31–60.
38.
MeijerG.MeijerS.Y.T. (2002), “Influence of the Code Civil in the Netherlands”, European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.14, pp.227–36.
39.
MillsP.A. (1993), “The Courts, Accounting Evolution and Freedom of Contract: A Comment on the Case Law Research”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.18, No.7/8, pp.765–81.
40.
MolengraaffW.L.P.A. (1912), Leidraad bij de beoefening van het Nederlandsche Handelsrecht, 2nd edition, Haarlem: Bohn.
41.
MorrisR.D. (1986), “Lee v Neuchatel Asphalte Company (1889) and Depreciation: Two Empirical Studies”, Accounting and Business Research, Winter, pp.71–81.
42.
MuellerG.G.GernonH.MeekG. (1991), Accounting: An International Perspective, second edition, Homewood, IL: Irwin.
43.
NapierC.NokeC. (1992), “Accounting and Law: An Historical Overview of an Uneasy Relationship”, in BromwichM.HopwoodA. (eds.), Accounting and the Law, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International, pp.30–54.
44.
PitloA. (1964), Het Verbintenissenrecht naar het Nederlands Burgerlijk Wetboek, sixth edition, Groningen: Tjeenk Willink.
45.
PontierJ.A. (1998), Rechtsvinding, fourth edition, Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.
46.
RaaijmakersM.J.G.C. (1987), “Rechtspersonen tussen contract en instituut”, inaugural lecture, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant.
47.
ReidJ.M. (1986), Law and Accounting: Pre-1889 British Legal Cases, New York: Garland.
48.
ReidJ.M. (1987), “Judicial Intervention in Accounting Behavior: A Reevaluation of the Nineteenth Century Experience”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol.6, No.1, pp.9–34.
49.
ReidJ.M. (1988), “Legal Acceptance of Accounting Principles in Great Britain and the United States: Some Lessons from History”, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol.15, No.1, Spring, pp.1–27.
50.
ShermanB. (1988), “Hermeneutics in Law”, The Modern Law Review, Vol.51, No.3, May, pp.386–402.
51.
SummersR.S. (2006), Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study, New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
TallonD. (1983), “Civil Law and Commercial Law”, in International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Vol. VIII, Specific Contracts, Tübingen: Mohr.
53.
ValkhoffJ. (1938), Een eeuw rechtsontwikkeling: De vermaatschappelijking van het Nederlandse privaatrecht sinds de codificatie (1838–1938), Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers.
54.
van der GrintenW.C.L. (1965), “Handelen te goeder trouw”, reproduced in JansenC.J.H.. (eds.), Verspreide geschriften van W.C.L. van der Grinten, Deventer: Kluwer, 2004, pp.57–69.
55.
van der GrintenW.C.L. (1969), “Marginale toetsing”, reproduced in JansenC.J.H.. (eds.), Verspreide geschriften van W.C.L. van der Grinten, Deventer: Kluwer, 2004, pp.71–85.
56.
van der HeijdenE.J.J. (1929), Handboek voor de naamlooze vennootschap naar Nederlandsch recht, Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
57.
van der HeijdenE.J.J.van der GrintenW.C.L. (1984) Handboek voor de naamloze en de besloten vennootschap, tenth edition, Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink.
58.
van der SchroefH.J. (1947), De Leer van de Kostprijs, Amsterdam: Kosmos.
59.
van der ZandenP.M. (1991), Maatschappelijk Aanvaardbare Normen voor de Jaarrekening en Goed Koopmansgebruik, Deventer: Kluwer Bedrijfswetenschappen.
60.
van DunnéJ.M. (2001), Verbintenissenrecht, deel 1, Contractenrecht, fourth edition, Deventer: Kluwer.
61.
VisserL.E. (1929), Beginselen van Handelsrecht volgens de Nederlandsche Wet, Vol. III, Supplement, De Naamlooze Vennootschap volgens de wet van 2 juli 1928, Stb. No 216, Den Haag: Belinfante.
62.
VolmerJ.G.Ch. (1894), Handleiding bij het opmaken en controleeren van inventaris en balans, Utrecht: Anton Abels.
63.
VogenauerS. (2001), Die Auslegung von Gesetzen in England und auf dem Kontinent: eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Rechtsprechung und ihrer historischen Grundlagen, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
64.
YoungsR. (1998), English, French and German Comparative Law, London: Cavendish Publishing.
65.
ZeffS.A.van der WelF.CamffermanK. (1992), Company Financial Reporting: A Historical and Comparative Study of the Dutch Regulatory Process, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
66.
ZeffS.A.BuijinkW.CamffermanK. (1999), “‘True and Fair’ in the Netherlands: inzicht or getrouw beeld?”, European Accounting Review, Vol.8, No.3, pp.523–48.
67.
ZweigertK.KötzH. (1998), An Introduction to Comparative Law, third edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Reference is also made to Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts, Band II: Institutionen, second edition, Tübingen: Mohr, 1984.
