In the late 1970s, the US government’s approval of a program of loan
guarantees on behalf of the Chrysler Corporation was an unprecedented
intervention into the logic of capitalism. The discourse that made this possible
involved a large set of sometimes conflicting rationales. Because the proposed
intervention was intimately connected to the past and future performance of a
single company, accounting information should have been a major element of the
decision making. This paper discusses where accounting information was used,
where it could have been used better and where it would have no role in this
particular historical episode. Whereas accounting could not have been the only
form of information involved in this major decision, it could have been used
more extensively and more imaginatively. The case points out that when
accounting is primarily used as ammunition and rationalisation, individuals do
not necessarily want to explore the limits of its usefulness.