Developments in History Proper have by-passed accounting history. While
sometimes open to occasional alarm calls such as this, mainstream history has
carried-on regardless behind a defunct methodological shield. Historians have
complacently paraded “interesting” data and evidence without
consideration of its validity or relevance. Philosophical concerns have been
methodically barred from consideration. Despite the Kuhnian Revolution, archival
antiquarianism reigns supreme. This regimen survives in a North-Korean-like
insularity, by combining a self-referential closure using Great Men of
accounting with a refusal to engage a broader literature in social history. This
paper redresses the balance in two ways: First, by using Kuhn’s
critique to show archivalist empiricism as incapable of proving a
paradigm’s truth, and revealing how easily the latter may succumb to
popularist euphoria and ideologies. Second, by sketching a Post-Kuhnian panorama
in terms of a Non-Eurocentric, social, gendered, environmental, public interest
and labour orientation. Ignoring such possibilities condemns accounting history
to more soldiering under impoverished Archivalism.
Armstrong, P.
, (1985),
“Changing Management Control Strategies: The Role of Competition
Between Accountancy and Other Organisational Professions”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.2,
No.2, pp.
129-148
.
2.
Baritz, L.
, (1960), The Servants of Power: A History of the Use of
Social Science in American Industry,
New York: John Wiley & Sons
.
3.
Barnes, B.T.S.
, (1982), Kuhn and Social Science,
New York: Columbia University Press
.
4.
Bernstein, R.J.
, (1987),
“Serious Play: The Ethical Political Horizon of Jacques Derrida”
, a paper presented to the University of Iowa Rhetoric
Seminar, Tuesday, 10 March 1987.
5.
Bogucki, P.
, (1999), The Origins of Human Society,
London: Blackwell
.
6.
Braverman, H.
, (1998), Labor and Monopoly Capital: 25th Year Anniversary
Edition,
New York: Monthly Review Press
.
7.
Bryer, R.
, (1994),
“Why Marx’s Labour Theory of Value is Superior to the
Marginalist Theory of Value: The Case of Modern Financial Reporting”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.5,
No.4, December, pp.
313-340
.
8.
Bryer, R.
, (1999),
“A Marxist Critique of the FASB’s Conceptual Framework”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.10,
No.5, October, pp.
551-589
.
9.
Caldwell, B.
, (1982a), Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the 20th
Century,
London: Allen & Unwin
.
10.
Caldwell, B.
, (1982b), Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the 20th
Century,
London: Allen & Unwin
.
11.
Carmona, S.
, (2004),
“Accounting History Research and its Diffusion in an
International Context”
, Accounting History, Vol.9, No.3,
November, pp.
7-23
.
12.
Carnegie, G.D.
and
Napier, C.
, (2002),
“Exploring Comparative International Accounting History”
, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol.15, No.5, pp.
689-718
.
13.
Cleaver, H.
, (1979), Reading Capital Politically,
Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press
.
14.
Dews, P.
, (1986),
“Adorno, Post-Structuralism and the Critique of Identity”
, New Left Review, Vol.157, No.1,
May-June, pp.
28-44
.
15.
Diop, C.A., (1974), The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or
Reality? Translation of sections of Antériorité des
Civilisations Négres, Mythe ou Vérité
Historique? and Nations Négres et Culture by Mercer Cook,
New York: Westport, Laurence Hill & Company.
16.
translated into English by Yaa-Lengi Meema Ngemi. Edit.: Salemson Harold J.
& De Jager.
17.
Engels, F.
, (1949), The Part Played by Labour in the Transition from Ape
to Man,
Moscow: Progress Publishers
, pp.1-16.
18.
Feyerabend, P.K.
, (1963),
“How to be a good Empiricist - A Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological”
, Philosophy of Science, The Delware Seminar, Vol.2,
Boumrin, B.
, (ed.), New York: Interscience Publishers.
19.
Feyerabend, P.K.
, (1969),
“Science Without Experience”
, Journal of Philosophy, Vol.LXVI.
20.
Feyerabend, P.
, (1970), Consolations for the Specialist, in Criticism and
the Growth of Knowledge,
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
21.
Feyerabend, P.
, (1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific
Research Programmes, in
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
22.
Feyerabend, P.
, (1973), Against Method,
London: New Left Books
.
23.
Feyerabend, P.
, (1975),
“How to Defend Society Against Science”
, Radical Philosophy, Vol.11, No.1, pp.
3-9
.
24.
Firestone, J.M.
and
Chadwick, R.W.
, (1971),
“Remarks on Concept Formation: Theory Building and Theory Testing”
, Philosophy of Science, Vol.38, No.1, pp.
42-91
.
25.
Firestone, J.M.
and
Chadwick, R.W.
, (1975),
“A New Procedure for Constructing Measurement Models of Ratio
Scale Concepts”
, International Journal of General Systems, Vol.2,
No.1, pp.
35-53
.
26.
Frisby, D.
, (1976), “Introduction to the English
Translation” in The Positivist Dispute in German
Sociology,
Adorno, T.
,
Albert, H.
,
Dahrendorf, R.
,
Habermans, J.
,
Pilot, H
and
Popper, K.
, (eds.),
London: Heinemann
.
27.
Fromm, E.
, (1966), Marx’s Concept of Man,
New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co
.
28.
Fromm, E.
, (1973), The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness,
New York: Fawcett Press
.
29.
Habermas, J.
, (1971), “Technology and Science as
Ideology” in Towards a Rational Society,
London: Heinemann
.
30.
Habermas, J.
, (1976), Legitimation Crisis,
London: Heinemann
.
31.
Hall, S.
, (1982), “The Rediscovery of Ideology: Return of
the Repressed in Media Studies”, in
Gurevitch, M.
,
Bennett, T.
,
Curren, J.
and
Woollacott, J.
(eds.), Culture, Society and Media,
London: Methuen & Co
., pp.56-90.
32.
Hall, S.
, (1983a), “The Great Moving Right
Show”, in
Hall, S.
and
Jacques, M.
(eds.), The Politics of Thatcherism,
London: Lawrence & Wishart
, pp.19-40.
33.
Hall, S.
, (1983b), “The Little Caesars of Social
Democracy”, in Hall, S. and Jacques, M., The Politics of
Thatcherism,
London: Lawrence & Wishart
, pp.309-322.
34.
Harvey, D.
, (1990), The Condition of Post-Modernity,
Oxford: Blackwell
.
35.
Held, D.
, (1980), Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to
Habermas,
London: Heinemann
.
36.
Hoogvelt, A.
, (1975), The Sociology of Developing Societies,
London: Macmillan Press
.
37.
Hoogvelt, A.
and
Tinker, A.M.
, (1978),
“The Role of the Colonial and Post Colonial State in Imperialism”
, The Journal of African Studies, Vol.16,
No.1, pp.
1-13
.
38.
Hopwood, A.G.
, (1985),
“The Tale of a Committee that Never Reported: Disagreements on
Intertwining Accounting with the Social”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.10,
No.3, pp.
361-377
.
39.
Hoskin, K.W.
and
Macve, R.H.
, (1986),
“Accounting and the Examination: A Genealogy of Disciplinary Power”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.11,
No.1, pp.
27-52
.
40.
Jameson, F.
, (1990), Late Capitalism: Adorno, or, The Persistence of the
Dialectic,
London: Verso, New Left Books
.
41.
Jameson, F.
, (1991), Postmodernism: or, The Cultural Logic of Late
Capitalism,
London: Verso
.
42.
Jones, G.S.
, (1972), “History: The Poverty of
Empiricism”, in
Blackburn, R.
(ed.), Ideology in Social Science: Readings in Critical Social
Theory,
Glasgow: Fontana/Collins
.
43.
Keenan, M.G.
, (1998a),
“A Defence of ‘Traditional’ Accounting
History Research Methodology”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.9,
No.6, pp.
641-666
.
44.
Keenan, M.G.
, (1998b),
“Rhetoric, Obfuscation and Genealogies of Calculation: A Reply to
My Critics”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.9,
No.6, pp.
713-719
.
45.
Keynes, J.M.
, (1936), General Theory of Employment, Interest and
Money,
London
.
46.
Kuhn, T.S.
, (1962),
“The Historical Structure of Scientific Discovery”
, Science, Vol.36, pp.
760-764
.
47.
Kuhn, T.S.
, (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,
second edition,
Chicago: University of Chicago
.
48.
Lakatos, I.
, (1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific
Research Programmes, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
49.
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.), (1970), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
50.
Lehman, C.
and
Tinker, T.
, (1987),
“The ‘Real’ Cultural Significance of Accounts”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.12,
No.5, pp.
503-522
.
51.
Littleton, A.C.
, (1933), Accounting Evolution to 1900,
New York: AIA
.
52.
Macve, R.
, (1999),
“Capital and Financial Accounting: A Commentary of
Bryer’s ‘A Marxist Critique of the FASB’S
Conceptual Framework’”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.10,
No.5, October, pp.
591-613
.
53.
Marcuse, H.
, (1964), One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of
Advanced Society,
London, Routledge & Kegan Paul
, pp.1-18.
54.
Marcuse, H.
, (1972), Studies in Critical Philosophy,
London: Verso
.
55.
Marx, K.
, (1990), The 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte,
New York: International Publishers
.
56.
Masterson, M.
, (1970), The Nature of a Paradigm, in Criticism and the
Growth of Knowledge, in
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
57.
Neimark, M.
, (1990),
“The King is Dead. Long Live the King!”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.1,
No.1, pp.
103-114
.
58.
Novack, G.
, (1971), Empiricism and its Evolution: A Marxist View,
New York: Pathfinder Press
.
59.
Pacioli, L.
, (1984), Particularis de Computis et Scripturis
(1494), in
Brown, E.G.
and
Johnston, K.S.
(eds.), Pacioli on Accounting,
New York and London: Garland Pushlishing Inc.
60.
Petersen, G.
, (1997), “Decolonization: The Highest Stage of
Imperialism?’ in
Denoon, D.
(ed.), Emerging from Empire: Decolonization in the Pacific,
Canberra: Australian National University
, pp.73-89.
61.
Poulantzas, N.
, (1975), Political Power and Social Class,
London: New Left Books
.
62.
Popper, K.
, (1968), The Logic of Scientific Discovery,
London: Hutchinson
.
63.
Popper, K.
, (1970), Normal Science and its Dangers, in Criticism and
Growth of Knowledge,
Lakatos, I.
and
Musgrave, A.
(eds.),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
64.
Quine, W.V.O.
, (1980a), “Two Dogmas of
Empiricism”, in Challenges to Empiricism,
Morick, H.
(ed.),
London: Methuen
.
65.
Quine, W.V.O.
, (1980b), From a Logical Point of View: Nine
Logico-Philosophical Essays,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
66.
Ravetz, J.R.
, (1973), Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems,
Harmondsworth: Penguin University Books
.
67.
Ravetz, J.R
, (1984),
“Ideological Commitments in the Philosophy of Science”
, Radical Philosophy, Summer, Vol.94,
No.1, pp.
5-10
.
68.
Ross, G.
, (1990), “Intellectuals Against the Left: The
Case of France”, in
Milliband, R.
and
Panitch, L.
(eds.), The Retreat of the Intellectuals, socialist Register,
London: Merlin Press
.
69.
Tinker, T.
, (1988),
“The Struggle Over Meaning in Accounting and Corporate Research:
A Comparative Evaluation of Conservative and Critical Historiography”
, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,
Vol.1, No.1, pp.
55-74
.
70.
Tinker, T.
, (1998),
“Hamlet Without the Prince: The Ethnographic Turn in Information
Systems Research”
, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol.11, No.1, pp.
3-33
.
71.
Tinker, T.
, (1999),
“Mickey Marxism Rides Again”
, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol.10,
No.5, October, pp.
643-670
.
72.
Tinker, T.
, (2004),
“The Enlightenment and its Discontents: Antinomies of
Christianity, Islam and the Calculative Sciences”
, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol.17, No.3, pp.
442-476
.
73.
Tinker, T.
and
Gray, R.
, (2003),
“Beyond a Critique of Pure Reason: From Policy to Politics to
Praxis in Environmental and Social Research”
, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol.16, No.5, pp.
727-761
.
74.
Tinker, T.
,
Lehman, C.
and
Neimark, M.
, (1987),
“The Struggle Over Meaning in Accounting and Corporate Research:
A Comparative Evaluation of Conservative and Critical Historiography”
, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol.1, No.1, pp.
55-73
.
75.
Tinker, T.
and
Lowe, E.A.
, (1984),
“One-Dimensional Management Science: The Making of a Technocratic Consciousness”
, Interfaces, Vol.14, No.2, pp.
40-55
.
76.
Tinker, T.
,
Merino, B.
and
Neimark, M.
, (1982),
“The Normative Origins of Positive Theories: Ideology and
Accounting Thought”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.7,
No.2, pp.
167-200
.
77.
Tinker, T.
and
Neimark, M.
, (1986),
“The Social Construction of Management Control Systems at General Motors”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.11,
No.4/5, pp.
369-395
.
78.
Tinker, T.
and
Neimark, M.
, (1987),
“Managing Gender and Class Contradictions at General Motors: 1916-1976”
, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.12,
No.1, pp.
71-88
.
79.
Tyson, T.
, (1987),
“The Nature and Function of Cost Keeping in a Late
Nineteenth-Century Small Business”
, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol.15,
No.1, pp.
29-44
.
80.
Yamey, B.S.
, (1949),
“Scientific Bookkeeping and the Rise of Capitalism”
, The Economic History Review, second series, l, 2 & 3, pp.
99-113
.
81.
Yamey, B.S.
, (1964),
“Accounting and the Rise of Capitalism: Further Notes on a Theme
by Sombart”
, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.2,
No.2, pp.
117-136
.
82.
Yamey, B.S.
, (1975),
“Notes on Double-Entry Bookkeeping and Economic Progress”
, The Journal of European Economic History, Winter,
Vol.7, No.7, pp.
717-723
.
