To perform reliably and confidently from memory, musicians must able to recover from mistakes and memory failures. We describe how an experienced singer (the second author) recovered from mistakes and gaps in recall as she periodically recalled the score of a piece of vocal music that she had memorized for public performance, writing out the music six times over a five-year period following the performance. Five years after the performance, the singer was still able to recall two-thirds of the piece. When she made mistakes, she recovered and went on, leaving gaps in her written recall that lengthened over time. We determined where in the piece gaps started (losses) and ended (gains), and compared them with the locations of structural beats (starts of sections and phrases) and performance cues (PCs) that the singer reported using as mental landmarks to keep track of her progress through the piece during the sung, public performance. Gains occurred on structural beats where there was a PC; losses occurred on structural beats without a PC. As the singer’s memory faded over time, she increasingly forgot phrases that did not start with a PC and recovered at the starts of phrases that did. Our study shows how PCs enable musicians to recover from memory failures.
AndersonJ.R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.
2.
BisesiE.WindsorW. L. (2016). Expression and communication of structure in music performance: Measurements and models. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed.; pp. 359–371). Oxford University Press.
3.
BoniniL.ServentiF. U.SimoneL.RozziS.FerrariP. F.FogassiL. (2011). Grasping neurons of monkey parietal and premotor cortices encode action goals at distinct levels of abstraction during complex action sequences. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 5876–5886. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5186-10.2011
4.
BrooksM.E.KristensenK.van BenthemK.J.MagnussonA.BergC.W.NielsenA.SkaugH. J.MaechlerM.BolkerB.M. (2017). glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000240890
BurgessN.HitchG. J. (2006). A revised model of short-term memory and long-term learning of verbal sequences. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(4), 627–652. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.005
ChaffinR.DemosA.P.LoganT. (2016). Performing from memory. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology, 2nd Ed. (pp. 359–371). Oxford University Press.
10.
ChaffinR.ImrehG.CrawfordM. (2002). Practicing perfection: Memory and piano performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11.
ChaffinR.LisboaT.LoganT.BegoshK.T. (2010). Preparing for memorized cello performance: The role of performance cues. Psychology of Music, 38, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608100377
12.
ChristensenW.SuttonJ.McIlwainD. J. (2016). Cognition in skilled action: Meshed control and the varieties of skill experience. Mind & Language, 31(1), 37–66. http://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12094
13.
ChuekeZ.ChaffinR. (2016). Performance cues for music ‘with no plan’: a case study of preparing Schoenberg’s Op. 11, No. 3. In MackieC. (Ed.), New thoughts on piano performance (pp. 255–268). London International Piano Symposium.
14.
CookN. (2013). Beyond the score: Music as performance. Oxford University Press.
15.
CrowderR. G.GreeneR. L. (2010). Serial learning. In TulvingE.CraikF. I. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 125–136). Oxford University Press.
DemosA.P.ChaffinR. (2017). Removing obstacles to the analysis of movement in musical performance: Recurrence, mixed models, and surrogates. In LesaffreM.MaesP-J.LemanM. (Eds). The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction (pp. 341–349). Routledge.
18.
DemosA.P.LisboaTLoganT.BegoshK. T.ChaffinR. (2020). A longitudinal study of the development of expressive timing. Psychology of Music, 48, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735618783563
FarrellS. (2012). Temporal clustering and sequencing in working memory and episodic memory. Psychological Review, 119, 223–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027371
24.
FinneyS. A.PalmerC. (2003). Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect. Memory and Cognition, 31(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196082
25.
FoxJ. (2003). Effect displays in R for Generalised Linear Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v08/i15/
26.
GinsborgJ. (2009). Beating time: The role of kinaesthetic learning in the development of mental representations for music. In MornellA. (Ed.), Art in Motion (pp. 121–142). Vienna: Peter Lang.
27.
GinsborgJ.ChaffinR. (2009). Very long term memory for words and melody: An expert singer’s written and sung recall over six year. In StevensC.KruitofB.BuckleyK.FazioS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Music Communication Science (ICoMCS2; pp 24–28), HCSNet, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, Australia
28.
GinsborgJ.ChaffinR. (2011). Performance cues in singing: evidence from practice and recall. In DeliègeI.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Music and the mind: Investigating the functions and processes of music (a book in honour of John Sloboda) (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
GinsborgJ.SlobodaJ. A. (2007). Singers’ recall for the words and melody of a new, unaccompanied song. Psychology of Music, 35(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607072654
30.
GinsborgJ.ChaffinR.DemosA.P. (2012). Different roles for prepared and spontaneous thoughts: A practice-based study of musical performance from memory. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 6, 201–231. http://doi.org/10.4407/jims.2014.02.005
31.
GinsborgJ.ChaffinR.NicholsonG. (2006). Shared performance cues in singing and conducting: a content analysis of talk during practice. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606061851
32.
GoddenD. R.BaddeleyA. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x
LindseyD. R. B.LoganG. D. (2019). Item-to-item associations in typing: Evidence from spin list sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 397–416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000605
36.
LindseyD. R. B.LoganG. D. (in press). Previously retrieved items contribute to memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
37.
LisboaT.ChaffinR.DemosA.P. (2015). Recording thoughts while memorizing music: a case study. Frontiers in Psychology. 5:1561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01561
38.
LisboaT.ChaffinR.LoganT.R. (2012). An account of deliberate practice: Thoughts, behaviour and the self in learning Bach’s Prelude 6 for cello solo. In CervinoA.LettbergM.LawsC.LisboaT. (Eds.) Practice of Practising (pp. 9–31). Orpheus Research Centre in Music.
39.
LisboaT.DemosA.P.ChaffinR. (2018). Training thoughts and actions for virtuoso performance. Musicae Scientiae, 22, 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918782350
40.
LoganG. D. (2018). Automatic control: How experts act without thinking. Psychological Review, 125, 453–485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rev0000100
MishraJ. (2010). Effects of structure and serial position on memory errors in musical performance. Psychology of Music, 38(4), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735609351919
PageM. P. A.NorrisD. (2009). A model linking immediate serial recall, the Hebb repetition effect and the learning of phonological word forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1536), 3737–3753.
PfordresherP. Q.PalmerC.JungersM. K. (2007). Speed, accuracy, and serial order in sequence production. Cognitive Science, 31, 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210709336985
SchacterD. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501
51.
SchacterD. L.GrafP. (1986). Effects of elaborative processing on implicit and explicit memory for new associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(3), 432–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.3.432
52.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Methods for Studying Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press.
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
55.
WilliamonA.ValentineE. (2002). The role of retrieval structures in memorizing music. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0759
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
