Reading strategy differences between college choral,band,and jazz musicians: Evidence for musical multiliteracies

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to determine reading strategy differences in completing a notation memorization task between three ensemble music traditions: jazz, choral, and band. The secondary purpose of this study was to assess possible relationships between ensemble affiliation, memorization strategies, and participants’ memorization accuracy. Participants (N = 81) had 75 s to memorize short melody while studying silently, singing, or playing on a keyboard. Participants then notated the each melody using staff notation. After completion of the task, participants ranked reading strategies employed. A Kruskal–Wallis test revealed participants in the three ensemble groups approached the memorization task using significantly different cognitive strategies: the choral group used solfege labeling more than the jazz group, the choral group used whole repetition more than the band group, and the jazz group used harmonic analysis more than the choral group. A Spearman rank correlation revealed significant relationships between stated strategies and memorization accuracy. A significant positive relationship was found between identification of patterns and accuracy on the memorization task. Group differences reveal how the forms of music literacy constructed through different ensemble affiliations may create different approaches to understanding staff notation.

Keywords

music memory music cognition music literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berliner

P. F.

(2009). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. University of Chicago Press.

Bernardi

N. F.

Schories

Jabusch

H. C.

Colombo

Altenmüller

(2012). Mental practice in music memorization: An ecological, empirical study. Music Perception, 30(3), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp2012.30.3.275

Berz

W. L.

(1995). Working memory in music: A theoretical model. Music Perception, 12(3), 353–364.

Broomhead

(2021). A new definition of music literacy: What, why, and how? Music Educators Journal, 107(3), 15–21.

Brown

(2015). We’re playing classical music all wrong—Composers wanted us to improvise. The Conversation, January, 14, 2015. https://theconversation.com/were-playing-classical-music-all-wrong-composers-wanted-us-to-improvise-36090

Brown

R. M.

Palmer

(2012). Auditory–motor learning influences auditory memory for music. Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 567–578.

Burakoff

Hettrick

W. E.

(1980). The sweet pipes recorder book: Adult method book 2. Sweet Pipes.

Byo

J. L.

Cassidy

J. W.

(2008). An exploratory study of time use in the practice of music majors: Self-report and observation analysis. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 27(1), 33–40.

Chaffin

Imreh

(2002). Practicing perfection: Piano performance as expert memory. Psychological Science, 13(4), 342–349.

10.

Chaffin

Logan

T. R.

Begosh

K. T.

(2009). Performing from memory. In Hallam

Cross

Thaut

(Eds.).

11.

Cope

Kalantzis

(2009). “Multiliteracies”: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195.

12.

Demorest

S. M.

(2001). Building choral excellence: Teaching sight-singing in the choral rehearsal. Oxford University Press.

13.

Fujioka

Trainor

L. J.

Ross

Kakigi

Pantev

(2004). Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 1010–1021.

14.

Gee

J. P.

(2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Routledge.

15.

Goolsby

T. W.

(1994). Profiles of processing: Eye movements during sightreading. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 97–123.

16.

Green

(2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Ashgate Publishing.

17.

Hargreaves

D. J.

North

A. C.

(1999). The functions of music in everyday life: Redefining the social in music psychology. Psychology of Music, 27(1), 71–83.

18.

Haslinger

Erhard

Altenmüller

Schroeder

Boecker

Ceballos-Baumann

A. O.

(2005). Transmodal sensorimotor networks during action observation in professional pianists. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 282–293.

19.

Indrisano

Chall

J. S.

(1995). Literacy development. Journal of Education, 177(1), 63–83.

20.

Iorio

Brattico

Munk Larsen

Vuust

Bonetti

(2022). The effect of mental practice on music memorization. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 230–244.

21.

Johnson-Laird

P. N.

(1970). The perception and memory of sentences. New Horizons in Linguistics, 1, 261–270.

22.

Kinsler

Carpenter

R. H. S.

(1995). Saccadic eye movements while reading music. Vision Research, 35(10), 1447–1458.

23.

Kohut

D. L.

(1973). Instrumental music pedagogy: Teaching techniques for school band and orchestra directors. Prentice Hall.

24.

Kohut

D. L.

(1985). Musical performance: Learning theory and pedagogy. Prentice Hall.

25.

Krivec

Bratko

Guid

(2021). Identification and conceptualization of procedural chunks in chess. Cognitive Systems Research, 69, 22–40.

26.

Lehmann

A. C.

Sloboda

J. A.

Woody

R. H.

(2007). Psychology for musicians: Understanding and acquiring the skills. Oxford University Press.

27.

Lim

Lippman

L. G.

(1991). Mental practice and memorization of piano music. The Journal of General Psychology, 118(1), 21–30.

28.

Lohmeyer

(2022). The effect of varying encoding conditions on jazz, instrumental, and choral musicians’ memorization accuracy: Implications for music literacy. Psychology of Music, 50(1), 265–279.

29.

Miller

G. A.

(1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81.

30.

Mills

McPherson

G. E.

(2015). Musical literacy: Reading traditional clef notation. In McPherson

G. E.

(Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 177–192). Oxford University Press.

31.

Mishra

(2002). A qualitative analysis of strategies employed in efficient and inefficient memorization. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 152(Spring), 74–86.

32.

Mishra

(2010). A century of memorization pedagogy. Journal of Historical Research in Music Education, 32(1), 3–18.

33.

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–93.

34.

Palladino

Cornoldi

De Beni

Pazzaglia

(2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 344–354.

35.

Sagrillo

(2016). Solfège and musical sight reading skills in a European context. Leo Kestenberg und Musikalische Bildung in Europa, 8, 115–127.

36.

Schaal

N. K.

Banissy

M. J.

Lange

(2015). The rhythm span task: Comparing memory capacity for musical rhythms in musicians and non-musicians. Journal of New Music Research, 44(1), 3–10.

37.

Sloboda

(1974). The eye-hand span-An approach to the study of sight-reading. Psychology of Music, 2(2), 4–10.

38.

Sloboda

J. A.

(1976). Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28(1), 1–16.

39.

Sloboda

J. A.

Parker

D. H. H.

(1985). Immediate recall of melodies. In Howell

Cross

West

(Eds.), Musical structure and cognition (pp. 143–167). Academic Press.

40.

Smith

Sataloff

R. T.

(2013). Choral pedagogy. Plural Publishing.

41.

Snyder

(2000). Music and memory: An introduction. MIT press.

42.

West

(2015). What research reveals about school jazz education. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 33(2), 34–40.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

10.13 MB