Sensorimotor integration tasks, such as body movements in time with music, can foster the experience of flow – a pleasurable state of full engagement and concentration occurring during a seemingly effortless and automatic activity. As it can be argued that both music and flow are embodied phenomena, perception-action coupling might be the core of the intimate relationship between flow and music. The current study examines the relationship between the subjective experience of flow and sensorimotor synchronization accuracy/stability in a finger-tapping task with music. In a between-subjects design, participants tapped in time with the beat of music clips with either low, medium, or high rhythmic complexity. After the tapping task, they rated their flow state on the Flow Short Scale with the two subscales fluency of performance and absorption by activity. Tapping accuracy and stability were assessed by the circular variance and the SD of inter-tap-intervals (ITIs), respectively. Both tapping accuracy and stability were significantly correlated with fluency of performance for music clips with medium and high rhythmic complexity, but not for music clips with low rhythmic complexity. No significant correlations were found between tapping accuracy/stability and absorption by activity. The findings add to evidence that perception-action coupling plays a key role in explaining the relationship between flow experience and musical activities. They also suggest that absorption by activity is not as relevant to the experience of flow during musical activities as one might initially assume.
AranedaR.RenierL.Ebner-KarestinosD.DricotL.De VolderA. G. (2017). Hearing, feeling or seeing a beat recruits a supramodal network in the auditory dorsal stream. European Journal of Neuroscience, 45(11), 1439–1450.
2.
BerensP. (2009). CircStat: A Matlab toolbox for circular statistics. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(10), 1–21.
3.
CameronD. J.GrahnJ. A. (2014). Enhanced timing abilities in percussionists generalize to rhythms without a musical beat. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1003.
4.
ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B.ZatorreR. J. (2008). Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. Cerebral Cortex, 18(12), 2844–2854.
5.
ChiricoA.SerinoS.CipressoP.GaggioliA.RivaG. (2015). When music ‘flows’: State and trait in musical performance, composition and listening: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 906.
6.
ClarkA. (1999). An embodied cognitive science?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351.
7.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
8.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1997). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LeFevreJ. (1989). Optimal experience in work and leisure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 815–822.
11.
CustoderoL. A. (2002). Seeking challenge, finding skill: Flow experience and music education. Arts Education Policy Review, 103(3), 3–9.
12.
DanielsenA. (2006). Presence and pleasure: The funk grooves of James Brown and Parliament. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
13.
de ManzanoO.TheorellT.HarmatL.UllénF. (2010). The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion, 10(3), 301–311.
14.
DietrichA. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 746–761.
15.
DrakeC.PenelA.BigandE. (2000). Tapping in time with mechanically and expressively performed music. Music Perception, 18(1), 1–23.
16.
EngelA. K.MayeA.KurthenM.KönigP. (2013). Where’s the action? The pragmatic turn in cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 202–209.
17.
EngeserS.RheinbergF. (2008). Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 158–172.
18.
EtaniT.MaruiA.KawaseS.KellerP. E. (2018). Optimal tempo for groove: Its relation to directions of body movement and Japanese Nori. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 462.
19.
GabrielssonA.Lindström WikS. (2003). Strong experiences related to music: A descriptive system. Musicae Scientiae, 7(2), 157–217.
20.
GaggioliA.ChiricoA.MazzoniE.MilaniL.RivaG. (2017). Networked flow in musical bands. Psychology of Music, 45(2), 283–297.
21.
GrahnJ. A.BrettM. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(5), 893–906.
22.
HoveM. J.StelzerJ.NierhausT.ThielS. D.GundlachC.MarguliesD. S.… MerkerB. (2015). Brain network reconfiguration and perceptual decoupling during an absorptive state of consciousness. Cerebral Cortex, 26(7), 3116–3124.
23.
JacksonS. A.EklundR. C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
24.
JacksonS. A.MarshH. W. (1996). Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The Flow State Scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18, 17–35.
25.
JanataP.TomicS. T.HabermanJ. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(1), 54–75.
26.
KellerJ.BlessH. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 196–209.
27.
KiversteinJ.MillerM. (2015). The embodied brain: Towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 237.
28.
KoehnS.StavrouN. A. M.CogleyJ.MorrisT.MosekE.WattA. P. (2017). Absorption in sport: A cross-validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1419.
29.
LartillotO.EerolaT.ToiviainenP.FornariJ. (2008). Multi-feature modeling of pulse clarity: Design, validation, and optimization. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 521–526). Philadelphia, PA: ISMIR.
30.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2007). A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 237–244). Bordeaux, France: DAFX.
31.
LemanM. (2010). An embodied approach to music semantics. Musicae Scientiae, 5, 43–67.
32.
LemanM. (2016). The expressive moment: How interaction (with music) shapes human empowerment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
LemanM.MaesP.-J. (2014). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 9, 236–246.
34.
MadisonG. (2006). Experiencing groove induced by music: Consistency and phenomenology. Music Perception, 24(2), 201–208.
35.
MaesP.-J. (2016). Sensorimotor grounding of musical embodiment and the role of prediction: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 308.
36.
MaherJ. M.MarkeyJ. C.Ebert-MayD. (2013). The other half of the story: Effect size analysis in quantitative research. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 345–351.
37.
ManningF.SchutzM. (2013). ‘Moving to the beat’ improves timing perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 1133–1139.
38.
MatthewsT. E.ThibodeauJ. N. L.GuntherB. P.PenhuneV. B. (2016). The impact of instrument-specific musical training on rhythm perception and production. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 69.
39.
MollerA. C.MeierB. P.WallR. D. (2010). Developing an experimental induction of flow: Effortless action in the lab. In BruyaB. (Ed.), Effortless attention (pp. 191–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40.
MorillonB.SchroederC. E.WyartV. (2014). Motor contributions to the temporal precision of auditory attention. Nature Communications, 5, 5255.
41.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.StewartL.MusilJ. J. (2013). Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) v1.0: Technical report and documentation. Revision 0.3. London: Goldsmiths, University of London.
42.
NakamuraJ.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2002). The concept of flow. In SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
NijsL. (2017). The merging of musician and musical instrument: Incorporation, presence, and levels of embodiment. In LesaffreM.MaesP.-J.LemanM. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction (pp. 49–57). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
NijsL.CoussementP.MoensB.AmelinckD.LesaffreM.LemanM. (2012). Interacting with the music paint machine: Relating the constructs of flow experience and presence. Interacting with Computers, 24(4), 237–250.
45.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2005). Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science, 308, 1430.
46.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2007). Hearing what the body feels: Auditory encoding of rhythmic movement. Cognition, 105, 533–546.
47.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2008). Vestibular influence on auditory metrical interpretation. Brain and Cognition, 67, 94–102.
48.
RheinbergF.VollmeyerR.EngeserS. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens. In Stiensmeier-PelsterJ.RheinbergF. (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (Tests und Trends N.F. 2) (pp. 261–279). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
49.
SalimpoorV. N.ZaldD. H.ZatorreR. J.DagherA.McIntoshA. R. (2015). Predictions and the brain: How musical sounds become rewarding. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(2), 86–91.
50.
SchaalN. K.BauerA.-K. R.MüllensiefenD. (2014). Der Gold-MSI: Replikation und Validierung eines Fragebogeninstrumentes zur Messung musikalischer Erfahrenheit anhand einer deutschen Stichprobe. Musicae Scientiae, 18(4), 423–447.
51.
SchiavioA.MeninD.MatyjaJ. (2014). Music in the flesh: Embodied simulation in musical understanding. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 24(3), 340–343.
52.
StupacherJ.HoveM. J.JanataP. (2016). Audio features underlying perceived groove and sensorimotor synchronization in music. Music Perception, 33(5), 571–589.
53.
StupacherJ.HoveM. J.NovembreG.Schütz-BosbachS.KellerP. E. (2013). Musical groove modulates motor cortex excitability: A TMS investigation. Brain and Cognition, 82(2), 127–136.
54.
StupacherJ.WitteM.HoveM. J.WoodG. (2016). Neural entrainment in drum rhythms with silent breaks: Evidence from steady-state evoked and event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(12), 1865–1877.
55.
SuY.-H.PöppelE. (2012). Body movement enhances the extraction of temporal structures in auditory sequences. Psychological Research, 76(3), 373–382.
56.
ThompsonE. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
VarelaF. J.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58.
VuustP.WitekM. A. G. (2014). Rhythmic complexity and predictive coding: A novel approach to modeling rhythm and meter perception in music. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1111.
59.
WitekM. A. G.ClarkeE. F.WallentinM.KringelbachM. L.VuustP. (2014). Syncopation, body-movement and pleasure in groove music. Plos One, 9, e94446.
60.
ZatorreR. J.ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B. (2007). When the brain plays music: Auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7), 547–558.
61.
ZellE.KrizanZ. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 111–125.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
