Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-9
The profile of music as a creative domain in people’s conceptions: Expanding Runco & Bahleda’s 1986 study on implicit theories of creativity in a conceptual replication
Concepts of creativity in music usually focus on explicit theoretical assumptions based on models from psychology research. In recent years, the fields of psychology and education have become increasingly interested in research on laypersons’ attitudes and assumptions about creativity. These implicit theories may complement or even contradict scholarly conceptualisations of creativity and its domain specificity. As a conceptual replication of the work by Runco and Bahleda (1986), this study aims to explore the dimensionality of subjective conceptions of creativity in different domains (arts, science, everyday life, music) by means of an open-ended questionnaire in an online survey (N = 106). A content analysis of the data yielded 27 meta-categories; a correspondence analysis of their distribution across domains revealed differences between domain-specific conceptions. This indicates stereotypical structures regarding creativity in different domains, as expressed in the associations generated by the participants. Unlike science and the arts, music is described as having distinct aesthetic and emotional qualities. The participants’ musical expertise did not appear to significantly influence the generation of associations. With respect to these characterisations cited by the participants, the domain of everyday life seems to be antipodal to other domains and may therefore have served as a point of reference for the participants’ subjective experience of creativity and creative behaviour. These results confirm the findings of Runco and Bahleda (1986), perhaps even furthering them in terms of the analytical methods applied and the findings on the comparison of domains. Nevertheless, the potential of implicit theories (i.e. laypersons’ mindsets concerning the theoretical conceptualisation of musical creativity and its implications for music education) requires further study.
BackhausK.ErichsonB.PlinkeW.WeiberR. (2006). Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung [Multivariate methods of analysis: An applied introduction] (11th ed.). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
2.
BaerJ. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16–29.
3.
BaerJ. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165–178.
4.
BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2017). The Amusement Park Theoretical Model of Creativity: An attempt to ridge the domain-specificity/generality gap. In KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P.BaerJ. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 8–17). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BalkinA. (1990). What is creativity? What is it not?Music Educators Journal, 76(9), 29–32.
6.
BenedekM.BorovnjakB.NeubauerA. C.Kruse-WeberS. (2014). Creativity and personality in classical, jazz and folk musicians. Personality and individual differences, 63, 117–121.
7.
BlackwellL. S.TrezniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.
8.
BiasuttiM. (2012). Group music composing strategies: A case study within a rock band. British Journal of Music Education, 29(3), 343–357.
9.
BullM. (2000). Sounding out the city: Personal stereos and the management of everyday life. Oxford, UK: Berg.
10.
ClarkeE. F. (2012). Creativity in performance. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 17–30). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
CookN. (2012). Beyond creativity? In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 451–459). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
DüvelN.WolfA.KopiezR. (2017). Neuromyths in music education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers and students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(629). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00629
13.
DweckC. S. (2011). Implicit theories. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 43–61). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage.
14.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995a). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.
15.
DweckC. S.ChiuC.HongY. (1995b). Implicit theories: Elaboration and extension of the model. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 322–333.
16.
DweckC. S.LegettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273.
17.
EysenckH. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147–178.
18.
FeistG. J. (2004). The evolved fluid specificity of human creative talent. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L.SingerJ. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 57–82). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
19.
FrielerK.MüllensiefenD.FischingerT.SchlemmerK.JakubowskiK.LothwesenK. (2013). Replication in music psychology. Musicae Scientiae, 17(3), 265–276.
20.
GlăveanuV. P. (2014). Revisiting the “Arts Bias” in lay conceptions of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 11–20.
21.
GoughH. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405.
22.
GreenacreM. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
23.
HargreavesD. J.HargreavesJ. J.NorthA. C. (2012). Imagination and creativity in music listening. In HargreavesD. J.MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 156–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
HargreavesD. J.MacDonaldR.MiellD. (2012). Explaining musical imaginations: Creativity, performance, and perception. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. 1–14). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. (2012). Preface. In HargreavesD.MiellD.MacDonaldR. A. (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance, and perception (pp. v–vi). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
HassR. W. (2014). Domain-specific exemplars affect implicit theories of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 44–52.
27.
HassR. W.BurkeS. (2016). Implicit theories of creativity are differentially categorized by perspective and exemplar domain. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 219–231.
28.
HassR. W.Reiter-PalmonR.Katz-BuonincontroJ. (2017). Are implicit theories of creativity domain specific? Evidence and implications. In KarwowskiM.KaufmanJ. C. (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 219–236). London, UK: Academic Press.
29.
IvcevicZ. (2007). Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(4), 271–290.
30.
IvcevicZ.BrackettM. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480–487.
31.
IvcevicZ.MayerJ. D. (2006). Creative types and personality. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26(1), 65–86.
32.
IvcevicZ.MayerJ. D. (2009). Mapping dimensions of creativity in the life-space. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 152–165.
33.
JordanousA.KellerB. (2016). Modelling creativity: Identifying key components through a corpus-based approach. PLoS ONE, 11(10): e0162959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162959
34.
JulmiC.SchermE. (2015). The domain-specificity of creativity: Insights from new phenomenology. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 151–159.
35.
JuslinP. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: Towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Physics of Life Reviews, 10, 235–266.
36.
JuslinP. N. (2016). Emotional reactions to music. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed., pp. 197–214). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37.
KaufmanJ. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308.
38.
KaufmanJ. C.BaerJ. (2004). Sure, I’m creative – but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143–155.
39.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.
40.
KaufmanJ. C.BeghettoR. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236.
41.
KempA. E. (1996). The musical temperament: Psychology and personality of musicians. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
KleinenG. (2003). Kreativität jenseits der klassischen Hemisphäre [Creativity beyond the Classical hemisphere]. In KleinenG. (Ed.), Begabung und Kreativität in der populären Musik [Talent and Creativity in Popular Music] (pp. 34–48). Münster, Germany: Lit.
43.
KrauseA. E.NorthA. (2016). Music listening in everyday life: Devices, selection methods, and digital technology. Psychology of Music, 44(1), 129–147.
44.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC. W.TauschA. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS) [Studies with a German version of the “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42(2), 139–156.
45.
KuckartzU. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
46.
LamontA.GreasleyA.SlobodaJ. (2016). Choosing to hear music: Motivation, process, and effect. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music psychology (2nd ed., pp. 711–724). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
LimW.PluckerJ. A. (2001). Creativity through a lens of social responsibility: Implicit theories of creativity with Korean samples. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 115–130.
48.
LothwesenK. (2014). Kreativität in der Musikpädagogik. Anmerkungen zu Begriffsverständnis und Thematisierungskontexten [Creativity in music education: Notes on conceptualisations and contexts of its discussion]. In VogtJ.HeßF.BrenkM. (Eds.), (Grund)Begriffe musikpädagogischen Nachdenkens: Entstehung, Bedeutung, Gebrauch [(Basic)Concepts of music educational reflection: Origins, meanings, applications] (pp. 183–212). Mainz, Germany: Schott.
49.
LothwesenK.LehmannA. C. (2017). Komposition und Improvisation [Composition and improvisation]. In LehmannA. C.KopiezR. (Eds.), Handbuch Musikpsychologie [Handbook of music psychology] (pp. 341–366). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
50.
LüfteneggerM.ChenJ. A. (2017). Conceptual issues and assessment of implicit theories. Zeitschrift für Psychologie [Journal of Psychology], 225(2), 99–106.
51.
MayringP. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative Content Analysis: Foundations and Techniques] (11th ed.), Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
52.
MüllensiefenD.GingrasB.MusilJ.StewartL. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS ONE, 9(2): e89642. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
53.
NiessenA. (2008). Individualkonzepte von Lehrenden: Subjektive didaktische Theorien im Fokus musikpädagogischer Lehr-/Lernforschung [Music teachers’ personal concepts: Qualitative classroom research in music education]. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1), 7. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs080178
54.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
55.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J.HargreavesJ. J. (2004). Uses of music in everyday life. Music Perception, 22(1), 41–77.
56.
OdenaO.WelchG. (2009). A generative model of teachers’ thinking on musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 416–442.
57.
OllenJ. E. (2006). A criterion-related validity test of selected indicators of musical sophistication using expert ratings (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Retrieved from http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1161705351
58.
PaletzS. A.PengK. (2008). Implicit theories of creativity across cultures: Novelty and appropriateness in two product domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(3), 286–302.
59.
PayneE. (2016). Creativity beyond innovation: Musical performance and craft. Musicae Scientiae, 20(3), 325–344.
60.
PluckerJ. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(1), 1–12.
61.
PluckerJ. A.BeghettoR. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L.SingerJ. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
62.
RinkJ. (Ed.) (2002). Musical performance: A guide to understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
RuncoM. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
64.
RuncoM. A. (2011). Implicit theories. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 644–646). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65.
RuncoM. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice (2nd ed.). London, UK: Academic Press.
66.
RuncoM. A.BahledaM. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(2), 93–98.
67.
RuncoM. A.JohnsonD. J. (2002). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3), 427–438.
68.
SawyerR. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165.
69.
SchoberM. F.SpiroN. (2014). Jazz improvisers’ shared understanding: A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(808). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00808
70.
SeddonF. A. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47–61.
71.
SilviaP. J.KaufmanJ. C.PretzJ. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific?: Latent class models creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–148.
72.
SlobodaJ. A. (2010). Music in everyday life: The role of emotions. In JuslinP. E.SlobodaJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications (pp. 493–514). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
SpielC.von KorffC. (1998). Implicit theories of creativity: The conceptions of politicians, scientists, artists and school teachers. High Ability Studies, 9(1), 43–58.
74.
SternbergR. J. (2005). The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it be posed? In KaufmanJ. C.BaerJ. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 299–306). Mahwah, NJ, US: Erlbaum.
75.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607–627.
76.
SternbergR. J.ConwayB. E.KetronJ. L.BernsteinM. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(1), 37–55.
77.
TangC.BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2015). Implicit theories of creativity in computer science in the United States and China. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(2), 137–156.
78.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
79.
WebsterP. R. (2002). Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. In SullivanT.WillinghamL. (Eds.), Creativity and music education (pp. 16–33). Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
