Electronic dance music (EDM) is music produced with the foremost aim to make people move. While research has revealed relationships between movement features and, for example, musical, emotional, or personality characteristics, systematic investigations of genre differences and specifically of EDM are rather rare. This article aims at offering insights into the embodiment of EDM from three different angles: first from a genre-comparison perspective, then by comparing different EDM stimuli with each other, and finally by investigating embodiments in one specific EDM stimulus. Sixty participants moved freely to 16 stimuli of four different genres (EDM, Latin, Funk, Jazz – four stimuli/genre) while being recorded with an optical motion capture system. Subsequently, a set of movement features was extracted from the motion capture data. Results indicate that participants moved with significantly higher acceleration of torso, head, hands, and feet and more overall movement to the EDM stimuli than to the other genres. Between EDM stimuli, several significant correlations were found, suggesting an increase in acceleration of different body parts with clearer and more percussive rhythmic structures and brighter sounds. Within one EDM stimulus, participants’ movements differed in several movement features distinguishing the break from surrounding sections, showing less acceleration, as well as less overall movement and rotational speed during the break. These analyses propose different ways of studying EDM and indicate distinctive characteristics of EDM embodiment.
AlluriV.ToiviainenP. (2010). Exploring perceptual and acoustical correlates of polyphonic timbre. Music Perception, 27, 223–242.
2.
AromS. (1991). African polyphony and polyrhythm: Musical structure and methodology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BrownS.MerkerB.WallinN. L. (2000). An introduction to evolutionary musicology, in WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BurgerB.LondonJ.ThompsonM. R.ToiviainenP. (2017). Synchronization to metrical levels in music depends on low-frequency spectral components and tempo. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00426–017–0894–2
5.
BurgerB.SaarikallioS.LuckG.ThompsonM. R.ToiviainenP. (2013). Relationships between perceived emotions in music and music-induced movement. Music Perception, 30, 517–533.
6.
BurgerB.ThompsonM. R.SaarikallioS.LuckG.ToiviainenP. (2013). Influences of rhythm- and timbre-related musical features on characteristics of music-induced movement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(183). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00183
7.
BurgerB.ToiviainenP. (2013). MoCap Toolbox – A Matlab toolbox for computational analysis of movement data. In BresinR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 172–178). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
8.
ButlerM. J. (2006). Unlocking the groove: Rhythm, meter, and musical design in electronic dance music. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
9.
CarlsonE.BurgerB.LondonJ.ThompsonM. R.ToiviainenP. (2016). Conscientiousness and Extraversion relate to responsiveness to tempo in dance. Human Movement Science, 49, 315–325.
10.
ChenJ. L.PenhuneV. B.ZatorreR. J. (2009). The role of auditory and premotor cortex in sensorimotor transformations. The Neurosciences and Music III – Disorders and Plasticity: Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1169, 15–34.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.
CollinsN. (2012). Influence in early electronic dance music: An audio content analysis investigation. In GouyonF.HerreraP.MartinsL. G.MüllerM. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 1–6). Porto, Portugal: FEUP Edições.
13.
CrossI. (2001). Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 930, 28–42.
14.
EigenfeldtA.PasquierP. (2013a). Considering vertical and horizontal context in corpus-based generative electronic dance music. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Creativity (pp. 72–78). Sydney, Australia, University of Sydney.
15.
EigenfeldtA.PasquierP. (2013b). Evolving structures for electronic dance music. In Proceedings of the 15th Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (pp. 319–326). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vrije University of Amsterdam.
16.
GodøyR. I.HagaE.JenseniusA. R. (2006). Playing “Air instruments”: Mimicry of sound-producing gestures by novices and experts. In GibetS.CourtyN.KampJ.-F. (Eds.), Gesture in human-computer interaction and simulation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3881 (pp. 256–267). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
17.
GrahnJ. A.BrettM. (2007). Rhythm and beat perception in motor areas of the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 893–906.
18.
HaugenM. R. (2017). Investigating musical meter as shape: Two case studies of Brazilian Samba and Norwegian Telespringar. In van DyckE. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 67–74). Ghent, Belgium: University of Ghent.
19.
KavanaughP. R.AndersonT. L. (2008). Solidarity and drug use in the electronic dance music scene. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 181–208.
20.
KellerP. E.RiegerM. (2009). Special Issue – Musical movement and synchronization. Music Perception, 26, 397–400.
LartillotO.ToiviainenP. (2007). A Matlab toolbox for musical feature extraction from audio. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (pp. 1–8). Bordeaux, France: University of Bordeaux.
23.
LemanM. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24.
LemanM.GodøyR. I. (2010). Why study musical gesture? In GodøyR. I.LemanM. (Eds.), Musical gestures: Sound, movement, and meaning (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
LesaffreM.De VoogdtL.LemanM.De BaetsB.De MeyerH.MartensJ.-P. (2008). How potential users of music search and retrieval systems describe the semantic quality of music. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 695–707.
26.
LittleN.BurgerB.CroucherS. M. (2018). EDM and ecstasy: The lived experiences of electronic dance music festival attendees. Journal of New Music Research, 47, 78–95.
27.
LuckG.SaarikallioS.BurgerB.ThompsonM. R.ToiviainenP. (2010). Effects of the Big Five and musical genre on music-induced movement. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 714–720.
28.
MadisonG.GouyonF.UllénF.HörnströmK. (2011). Modeling the tendency for music to induce movement in humans: First correlations with low-level audio descriptors across music genres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1578–1594.
29.
NavedaL.LemanM. (2010). The spatiotemporal representation of dance and music gestures using Topological Gesture Analysis (TGA). Music Perception, 28, 93–112.
30.
NettlB. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In WallinN. L.MerkerB.BrownS. (Eds.), The origins of music (pp. 463–472). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
PalamarJ. J.AcostaP.ShermanS.OmpadD. C.ClelandC. M. (2016). Self-reported use of novel psychoactive substances among attendees of electronic dance music venues. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 42, 624–632.
32.
Phillips-SilverJ.TrainorL. J. (2008). Vestibular influence on auditory metrical interpretation. Brain and Cognition, 67, 94–102.
33.
RileyS. C. E.GriffinC.MoreyY. (2010). The case for “everyday politics”: Evaluating neo-tribal theory as a way to understand alternative forms of political participation, using electronic dance music culture as an example. Sociology, 44, 345–363.
34.
RochaB.BogaardsN.HoninghA. (2013). Segmentation and timbre similarity in electronic dance music. In BresinR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th Sound and Music Computing Conference (pp. 754–761). Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
35.
SavitzkyA.GolayM. J. E. (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627–1639.
36.
SolbergR. T.JenseniusA. R. (2017). Group behaviour and interpersonal synchronization to electronic dance music. Musicae Scientiae. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1029864917712345
37.
St JohnG. (2006). Electronic dance music culture and religion: An overview. Culture and Religion, 7, 1–25.
38.
StupacherJ.HoveM. J.JanataP. (2016). Audio features underlying perceived groove and sensorimotor synchronization in music. Music Perception, 33, 571–589.
39.
van DyckE.MoelantsD.DemeyM.DeweppeA.CoussementP.LemanM. (2013). The impact of the bass drum on human dance movement. Music Perception, 30, 349–359.
40.
VarelaF. J.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
WesselD. (1979). Timbre space as a musical control structure. Computer Music Journal, 3, 45–52.
42.
YadatiK.LarsonM.LiemC. C. S.HanjalicA. (2014). Detecting drops in electronic dance music: Content based approaches to a socially significant music event. In WangH.-M.YangY.-H.LeeJ. H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 143–148). Taipei, Taiwan.
