This article reports on initial exploratory trials of a methodological extension of zygonic theory, through which this psychomusicologically-based approach was used to analyse patterns of musical influence within pieces created by groups of primary school children aged 9–11 years in England and Japan. Previously, the theory had been used in educational and therapeutic contexts to gauge the musical impact of each participant on the other in one-to-one musical interactions. The preliminary findings reported here suggest that zygonically-derived analytical techniques may potentially be of value not only in defining children’s musical contributions and patterns of influence as they seek to create pieces in groups, but also in comparative studies that examine the potentially dissimilar improvisatory approaches adopted by different cohorts of pupils. It is further argued that zygonic measures of musical influence may be of value as inverse proxy measures of creativity.
BaarenR.MadduxW.ChartrandT.de BouterC.van KnippenbergA. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1093–1102.
2.
BerkowitzM.GibbsJ.BroughtonJ. (1980). The relation of moral judgement disparity to developmental effects of peer dialogue. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 26(4), 341–357.
3.
BlackingJ. (1973). How musical is man?Seattle: University of Washington Press.
4.
BodenM. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
5.
BondR.SmithP. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137.
6.
BoulezP. (1971). Boulez on music today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
BrayM.AdamsonB.MasonM. (2007). Different models, different emphases, different insights. In BrayM.AdamsonB.MasonM. (Eds.), Comparative education research: Approaches and methods (pp. 363–380). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
8.
BregmanA. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
CrossI. (1998). Music analysis and music perception. Music Analysis, 17(1), 3–20.
10.
FauconnierG. (1994). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
GaltonM. (1997). Group work and co-operative learning. In GaltonM.HastingsN. (Eds.), Effective Primary Teaching (pp. 44–54). London, UK: David Fulton.
12.
GjerdingenR. (1999). An experimental music theory? In CookN.EverestM. (Eds.), Rethinking music (pp. 161–170). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
KağitçibasiÇ. (1997). Individualism and group loyalties: Are they compatible? In KağitçibasiÇ. (Ed.), Growth and Progress in Cross-Cultural Psychology (pp. 94–104). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
15.
KikuchiM. (1981). Creativity and ways of thinking: The Japanese style. Physics Today, 41(September), 42–45.
16.
KrugerA. (1992). The effect of peer and adult-child transactive discussions on moral reasoning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 38(2), 191–211.
17.
KrumhanslC. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
LewinD. (1987). Generalized musical intervals and transformations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
LubartT. (1990). Creativity and cross-cultural variation. International Journal of Psychology, 25(1), 39–59.
21.
MacDonaldR.MiellD.MitchellL. (2002). An investigation of children’s musical collaborations: The effect of friendship and age. Psychology of Music, 30(2), 148–163.
22.
MarkusH.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
23.
MatsumotoD. (2006). Culture and cultural worldviews: Do verbal descriptions about culture reflect anything other than verbal descriptions of cultures?Culture and Psychology, 12(1), 33–62.
24.
MeyerL. (1967). Music, the arts, and ideas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MiellD.MacDonaldR. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348–369.
27.
MillerJ. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(5), 961–978.
28.
MillsJ. (2009). Music in the primary school. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
MorrisM.PengK. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 949–971.
31.
NorthA. C.HargreavesD. J. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32.
OckelfordA. (1991). The role of repetition in perceived musical structures. In HowellP.WestR.CrossI. (Eds.), Representing musical structure (pp. 129–160). London, UK: Academic Press.
33.
OckelfordA. (1993). A theory concerning the cognition of order in music (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of London, UK.
34.
OckelfordA. (1999). The cognition of order in music: A metacognitive study. London, UK: Roehampton Institute.
35.
OckelfordA. (2002). The magical number two, plus or minus one: Some limits on our capacity for processing musical information. Musicae Scientiae, 6(2), 177–215.
36.
OckelfordA. (2005). Repetition in music: Theoretical and metatheoretical perspectives. London, UK: Ashgate.
37.
OckelfordA. (2006). Using a music-theoretical approach to interrogate musical development and social interaction. In LernerN.StrausJ. (Eds.), Sounding off: Theorizing disability in music (pp. 137–55). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
OckelfordA. (2007). Exploring musical interaction between a teacher and pupil, and her evolving musicality, using a music-theoretical approach. Research Studies in Music Education, 28(1), 51–70.
39.
OckelfordA. (2009a). Beyond music psychology. In HallamS.CrossI.ThautM. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of music psychology (pp. 539–551). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40.
OckelfordA. (2009b). Zygonic theory: Introduction, scope, prospects. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie, 6(1), 91–172.
41.
OckelfordA. (2011). Another exceptional musical memory: Evidence from a savant of how atonal music is processed in cognition. In DeliègeI.DavidsonJ. (Eds.), Festschrift for John Sloboda (pp. 237–288). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
OckelfordA. (2012a). Applied musicology: Using zygonic theory to inform music psychology, education and therapy research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
OckelfordA. (2012b). Songs without words: Exploring how music can serve as a proxy language in social interaction with autistic children. In MacDonaldR.KreutzA.MitchellL. (Eds.), Music, Health and Well-being (pp. 289–323). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
OckelfordA.MatawaC. (2009). Focus on music 2: Exploring the musical interests and abilities of blind and partially-sighted children with retinopathy of prematurity. London, UK: Institute of Education.
45.
OysermanD.CoonH.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–73.
46.
RothbaumF.PottM.AzumaH.MiyakeK.WeiszJ. (2000). The development of close relationships in Japan and in the United States: Paths of symbiotic harmony and generative tension. Child Development, 71(5), 1121–1142.
47.
SaekiN.FanX.van DusenL. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 24–36.
48.
SawyerK. (1999). Improvised conversations: Music, collaboration and development. Psychology of Music, 27(2), 192–205.
49.
SharpeR. (1983). Two forms of unity in music. The Music Review, 44, 274–286.
50.
ShibazakiK. (2010). Children’s collaborative creativity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Roehampton, London, UK.
51.
SilversteinM. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In LucyJ. (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SmallC. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
53.
SonnenburgS. (2004). Creativity in communication: A theoretical framework for collaborative product creation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(4), 254–262.
54.
SperberD.WilsonD. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
55.
TobinJ. (2000). Using “The Japanese Problem” as a corrective to the ethnocentricity of western theory. Child Development, 71(5), 1155–1158.
