This article addresses the silent reading of music notation, combining eye-movement measures with a semantic analysis of readers’ verbal descriptions of the notated music. A group of musical novices (n = 16) and two groups of musical amateurs (less experienced n = 11 and more experienced n = 10) participated in three separate measurement sessions during a nine-month-long university music course designed for future primary-school teachers. In each session they viewed a notated folk song for 30 s and then described what they had seen. Greater musical experience was found to be connected with shorter fixation durations, more linear scanning of the notated music, and more accurate and integrative verbal descriptions. Repeated measurements during the course were connected to more accurate and integrative descriptions as well as the use of longer saccades for all participants. A cluster analysis of the results revealed three separate silent-reading styles: elementary processors, lacking in both accuracy and integration in their verbal reports; accurate analyzers, producing accurate but non-integrative descriptions; and accurate integrators who, besides accurate and integrative descriptions, showed a tendency of using shorter fixation times than the two other groups. The results are discussed with a view to visual processes in other domains. In addition, a question is raised whether educational programs tend to unduly neglect considering music notation as a source of information beyond its role as a performance aid.
BurmanD. D.BoothJ. R. (2009). Music rehearsal increases the perceptual span for notation. Music Perception, 26(4), 303–320.
2.
CastelhanoM. S.MackM. L.HendersonJ. M. (2009). Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3), 1–15.
3.
CharnessN.ReingoldE. M.PomplunM.StampeD. M. (2001). The perceptual aspect of skilled performance in chess: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1146–1152.
4.
DeAngelusM.PelzJ. B. (2009). Top–down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7), 790–811.
5.
DeBellisM. (1995). Music and conceptualization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
De GrootA. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
7.
De GrootA. (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In KleinmuntzB. (Ed.), Problem solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 19–50). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
8.
de GrootA.GobetF. (1996). Perception and memory in chess: Studies in the heuristics of the professional eye. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
9.
FurneauxS.LandM. F. (1999). The effects of skill on the eye-hand span during musical sight-reading. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 266, 2435–2440.
10.
GegenfurtnerA.LehtinenE.SäljöR. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523–552.
11.
GilmanE.UnderwoodG. (2003). Restricting the field of view to investigate the perceptual span of pianists. Visual Cognition, 10(2), 201–232.
12.
GoolsbyT. W. (1994a). Eye movement in music reading: Effects of reading ability, notational complexity, and encounters. Music Perception, 12(1), 77–96.
13.
GoolsbyT. W. (1994b). Profiles of processing: Eye movements during sightreading. Music Perception, 12(1), 96–123.
14.
HansenJ. P. (1991). The use of eye mark recordings to support verbal retrospection in software testing. Acta Psychologica, 76(1), 31–49.
15.
HegartyM.CanhamM. S.FabrikantS. I. (2010). Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 37–53.
16.
HultbergCecilia (2002). Approaches to music notation: The printed score as a mediator of meaning in Western tonal tradition. Music Education Research, 4(2), 185–197.
17.
HyrskykariA.OvaskaS.MajarantaP.RäihäK.-J.LehtinenM. (2008). Gaze path stimulation in retrospective think-aloud. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(4), 1–18.
18.
JarodzkaH.ScheiterK.GerjetsP.van GogT. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 146–154.
19.
KaakinenJ. K.HyönäJ. (2005). Perspective effects on expository texts on text comprehension: Evidence from think-aloud protocols, eye tracking, and recall. Discourse Processes, 40(3), 239–257.
20.
KellmanP. J. (2002). Perceptual learning. In PashlerH.GallistelR. (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 3: Learning, motivation, and emotion, pp. 259–299). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
21.
KendeouP.van den BroekP. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235–245.
22.
KendeouP.van den BroekP. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577.
23.
KinslerV.CarpenterR. H. S. (1995). Saccadic eye movements while reading music. Vision Research, 35(10), 1447–1458.
24.
KozhevnikovM. (2007). Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 464–481.
25.
MadellJ.HébertS. (2008). Eye movements and music reading: Where do we look next?Music Perception, 26(2), 157–170.
26.
ManningD.EthellS.DonovanT.CrawfordT. (2006). How do radiologists do it? The influence of experience and training on searching for chest nodules. Radiography, 12(2), 134–142.
PenttinenM.HuovinenE. (2011). The early development of sight-reading skills in adulthood: A study of eye movements. Journal of Research in Music Education, 59(2), 196–220.
29.
PolankaM. (1995). Research note: Factors affecting eye movements during the reading of short melodies. Psychology of Music, 23(2), 177–183.
30.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.
31.
RaynerK.MillerB.RotelloC.M. (2008). Eye movements when looking at print advertisements: The goal of the viewer matters. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 697–707.
32.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
33.
TanS. L. (2002). Beginners’ intuitions about musical notation. College Music Symposium, 42, 131–141.
34.
TanS. L.WakefieldE. M.JeffriesP. W. (2009). Musically untrained college students’ interpretations of musical notation: Sound, silence, loudness, duration, and temporal order. Psychology of Music, 37(1), 5–24.
35.
TruittF. E.CliftonC.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (1997). The perceptual span and the eye-hand span in sight-reading music. Visual Cognition, 4(2), 143–161.
36.
van GogT.PaasF.van MerriënboerJ. J. G.WitteP. (2005). Uncovering the problem-solving process: Cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(4), 237–244.
37.
WatersA.UnderwoodG. (1998). Eye movements in a simple music reading task: A study of experts and novice musicians. Psychology of Music, 26(1), 46–60.
38.
WatersA.UnderwoodG.FindlayJ. M. (1997). Studying expertise in music reading: Use of a pattern-matching paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(4), 477–488.
39.
WurtzP.MueriR. M.WiesendangerM. (2009). Sight-reading of violinists: Eye movements anticipate the musical flow. Experimental Brain Research, 194(3), 445–450.
40.
YarbusA. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision (HaighB., Trans.). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
