Parallels between language and music are considered as a useful basis for examining possible evolutionary pathways of these achievements. Such parallels become apparent if we compare clauses and syllables in language with phrases and notes in music: Clauses as well as musical phrases typically span about 2 sec and about 5 to 10 pulses, i.e. syllables or notes. The n of syllables per clause or intonation unit also can be used as a measure of tempo across languages and thus also as a means for a better understanding of typological co-variations in the rhythm of speech and music. Further correspondences were found between the size of the sound-relevant inventories, i.e. vowels and musical intervals: a minimum of roughly 3 and a maximum of roughly 12 elements as well as a frequency peak at 5 elements. A link between vowels and musical intervals is also indicated by our findings that in Alpine yodellers the vowels are highly correlated to melodic direction according to their F2 ordering.
These parallels are discussed from an evolutionary perspective that either sees music as a precursor of language or both language and music as descendents of a common, “half-musical” precursor (Jespersen, 1895; Brown, 2000). A rather simple explanation of the parallels is reported: If singing in a broader sense of the word is the most original form of music, then the functionality of any mechanism involved in the programming and the online-control of intonation units will be reflected in language as well as in music.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BickertonD. (2000). How protolanguage became language. In KnightC., Studdert-KennedyM., & HurfordJ. (eds), The evolutionary emergence of language (pp. 264–84). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BrownS. (2000). The “musilanguage” model of human evolution. In WallinN.L., MerkerB., & BrownS. (eds), The origins of music (pp. 271–300). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
BurnsE. M. (1999). Intervals, scales, and tuning. In DeutschD. (ed), The psychology of music (pp. 215–64). 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
5.
ChafeW. (1987). Cognitive constraints on information flow. In TomlinR. S. (ed), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 21–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6.
ChuM., & FengY. (2001). Study on factors influencing durations of syllables in Mandarin. Proceedings of Eurospeech (pp. 927–30). Aalborg.
7.
CrossI. (2003). Music and evolution: causes and consequences. Contemporary Music Review, 22, 79–89.
8.
CowanN. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory. A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.
9.
CrothersJ. (1978). Typology and universals of vowel systems. In GreenbergJ. H. (ed), Universals of human language (pp. 93–152). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10.
CumminsF. (2002). Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. In Proceedings of Prosody (pp. 121–26), Aix-en-Provence.
FenkA., & Fenk-OczlonG. (1993). Menzerath's law and the constant flow of linguistic information. In KöhlerR., & RiegerB.B. (eds), Contributions to quantitative linguistics (pp. 11–31). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14.
FenkA., & Fenk-OczlonG. (2007). Inference and reference in language evolution. In VasniadouS., KayserD., ProtopapasA. (eds), Proceedings of EuroCogSci07 (p. 889). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
Fenk-OczlonG. (1983). Bedeutungseinheiten und sprachliche Segmentierung. Eine sprachvergleichende Untersuchung über kognitive Determinanten der Kernsatzlänge.Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
16.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (1985). The mean length of propositions is 7 plus minus 2 syllables — but the position of languages within this range is not accidental. In d'YdewalleG. (ed), Proceedings of the XXIII International Congress of Psychology: Selected/Revised Papers, Vol. 2: Cognition, information, and motivation (pp. 355–59). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
17.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (1999). Cognition, quantitative linguistics, and systemic typology. Linguistic Typology, 3-2, 151–77.
18.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (2000). The magical number seven in language and cognition: empirical evidence and prospects of future research. Papiere zur Linguistik, 62/63, 3–14.
19.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (2002). The clausal structure of linguistic and pre-linguistic behavior. In GivónT., & MalleB.F. (eds), The evolution of language out of pre-language (pp. 215–29). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (2005). Crosslinguistic correlations between size of syllables, number of cases, and adposition order. In Fenk-OczlonG., & WinklerC. (eds), Sprache und Natürlichkeit. Gedenkband für Willi Mayerthaler (pp. 75–86). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
21.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (2005). Cognitive constraints on the organization of language and music. In BaraB.G., BarsalouL., & BucciarelliM. (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2476). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Fenk-OczlonG., & FenkA. (2006). Speech rhythm and speech rate in crosslinguistic comparison. In SunR., & MiyakeN. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (p. 2480). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
FitchW. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: A comparative perspective. Cognition, 100 (1), 173–215.
24.
FraisseP. (1957). Psychologie du temps.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
25.
FraisseP. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In DeutschD. (ed), The psychology of music (pp. 149–80). New York: Academic Press.
26.
GiglerG. (in preparation). Intonationseinheiten im Kaerntnerischen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Klagenfurt.
27.
GrabeE., & LowE. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In GussenhovenC., & WarnerN. (eds), Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 515–46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28.
GreenbergJ. H. (1968). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction.New York: Random House.
29.
HockettC. F. (1955). A manual of phonology.Baltimore: Waverly Press.
30.
HughesD.W. (2000). No nonsense: the logic and power of acoustic-iconic mnemonic systems. British Journal of Ethnomusicology, 9/ii, 95–122.
31.
HuronD. (1996). The melodic arch in Western folksongs. Computing in Musicology, 10, 3–23.
32.
JespersenO. (1922). Language.London: Allen.
33.
JespersenO. (1983 [1895]). Progress in language. Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics 17.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34.
KegelG. (1990). Sprach- und Zeitverarbeitung bei sprachauffälligen und sprachunauffälligen Kindern. In KegelG., ArnholdT., DahlmeierK., SchmidG., & TischerB. (eds), Sprechwissenschaft und Psycholinguistik, 4.Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
35.
KnöscheT. R., HaueisenJ., NeuhausC., MaessB., AlterK., FriedericiA. D., & WitteO.W. (2003). An electrophysiological marker for phrasing in music. Paper presented at the HFSP Workshop on Music and Language Processing, Sydney, April 2003.
36.
KolinskiM. (1959). The evaluation of tempo. Society of Ethnomusicology, 3, 45–57.
37.
KutasM., & HillyardS. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11, 99–116.
38.
LadefogedP. (2001). Vowels and consonants.Malden: Blackwell.
39.
LavoieP., & GrondinS. (2004). Information processing limitations as revealed by temporal discrimination. Brain and Cognition, 54, 198–200.
40.
LuangthongkumF. (1977). Rhythm in standard Thai. Unpublished Ph. D. thesis. University of Edingburgh.
41.
MäättäT. (1993). Prosodic structure indices in a folk tale. Phonum, 2, 107–20.
42.
MartinJ. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. Psychological Review, 79, 487–509.
43.
McMullenE., & SaffranJ. R. (2004). Music and language: A developmental comparison. Music Perception, 21, 289–311.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
46.
MithenS. (2005). The singing Neanderthals.London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
47.
MeyerJ. (2007). What does the typology of whistled forms of language teach us about prosody? In Book of Abstracts (p. 173), 7th International Conference of the Association for Linguistic Typology, Paris, September 25-28.
48.
MorleyI. (2003). The evolutionary origins and archaeology of music. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cambridge (electronic edition Jan. 2006).
49.
NettlB. (1954). Text-music relationships in Arapaho songs. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 10, 192–99.
50.
NettlB. (1956). Music in primitive culture.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
NettlB. (2000). An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In WallinN.L., MerkerB., and BrownS. (eds), The origins of music (pp. 463–72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
PatelA. D., & DanieleJ. R. (2003). An empirical comparison of rhythm in language and music. Cognition, 87, B35–45.
53.
ParncuttR., & DrakeC. (2001). Psychology: Rhythm. In S. Sadie (ed), New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, 20. London, 535-38, 542–55.
54.
PikeK. L. (1945). The intonation of American English.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
55.
ParncuttR., & PascallR. (2002). Middle-out music analysis and its psychological basis. In StevensC., BurnhamD., McPhersonG., SchubertE., & RenwickJ. (eds), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition.Adelaide: Causal Productions.
56.
PommerJ. (1893). 252 Jodler und Juchezer.Wien: Rebay & Robitschek.
57.
RakowskiA. (1999). Perceptual dimensions of pitch and their appearance in the phonological system of music. Musicæ Scientiæ, 3, 1, 23–29.
58.
RamusF. (2002). Acoustic correlates of linguistic rhythm. In BernardB., & MarlienI. (eds), Proceedings Speech Prosody 2002.Aix-en-Provence.
59.
RamusF., NesporM., & MehlerJ. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–92.
60.
RamusF., HauserM.D., MillerC., MorrisD., & MehlerJ. (2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and by Cotton-top Tamarin Monkeys. Science, 288, 349–51.
61.
SadakataM., OhgushiK., & DesainP. (2004). A cross-cultural comparison study of the production of simple rhythm patterns. Psychology of Music, 32, 389–403.
62.
SchleidtM. (1992). Universeller Zeittakt im Wahrnehmen, Erleben und Verhalten. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, Dezember, 11–115.
63.
SchleidtM., & KienJ. (1997). Segmentation in behavior and what it can tell us about brain function. Human Nature, 8, 77–111.
64.
SlobodaJ.A. (1982). Music Performance. In DeutschD. (ed), The psychology of music. (pp. 479–96) New York: Academic Press.
SteinhauerK., AlterK., & FriedericiA. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. nature neuroscience, 2/2, 191–96.
67.
SternD. N. (2001). Face to face play: its temporal structure as predictor of socioaffective development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66, 144–49.
68.
TemperleyD. (2001). The cognition of basic musical structures.Cambridge/MA, London: MIT Press.
69.
TrevarthenC. (1999). Musicality and the intrinsic motive pulse: Evidence from human psychobiology and infant communication. Musicæ Scientiæ, Special Issue (1999-2000), 155–215.
70.
WenkB. J., & WiolandF. (1982). Is French really syllable-timed?Journal of Phonetics, 10, 193–218.
71.
WhalenD. H., & LevittA. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 349–66.
72.
WhalenD. H., LevittA. G., HsiaoP.-L., & SmorodinskyI. (1995). Intrinsic F0 of vowels in the babbling of 6–, 9– and 12–month-old French-and English-learning infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 2533–39.
73.
WittmannM., & PöppelE. (1999). Temporal mechanisms of the brain as fundamentals of communication — with special reference to music perception and performance. Musicæ Scientiæ, Special Issue (1999-2000), 7–11.
74.
WrayA. (1998). Protolanguage as a holistic system for social interaction. Language and Communication, 18, 47–67.
75.
ZeeE. (1980). Tone and vowel quality. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 247–58.
