Pythagorean tuning, which derives all musical intervals of a Western chromatic scale from repeated application of a fifth and subsequent reduction (collapse) into a single octave, results in an octave interval slightly larger than 2:1, and the difference between a Pythagorean octave and a 2:1 octave is referred to as the Pythagorean comma. Empirical studies suggest that listeners prefer a stretched octave, that is, an octave interval slightly larger than 2:1. The magnitudes of the Pythagorean comma and of the stretch from a 2:1 ratio in preferred octave tuning are similar, and it is suggested these phenomena might be connected. Implications of such a similarity that are addressed include (a) how the Pythagorean comma predicts preference for a stretched octave, (b) rejection of uncertainties in tuning as a cause of preference for a stretched octave, (c) how the Pythagorean comma and preference for a stretched octave might be related to tension and musical aesthetics, (d) the nature of “scales” and “intervals” in musical and psychophysical senses, (e) the role of motion through auditory pitch space in the Pythagorean comma and preference for a stretched octave, and (f) incorporation of elements of Pythagorean tuning into the representation of the octave.
AldwellE.SchachterC.CadwalladerA. (2019). Harmony & voice leading (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
2.
AmmiranteP.ThompsonW. F. (2012). Continuation tapping to triggered melodies: Motor resonance effects of melodic motion. Experimental Brain Research, 216(1), 51–60.
3.
BairdJ. C.NomaE. (1978). Fundamentals of scaling and psychophysics. Wiley.
4.
BarbourJ. M. (2004). Tuning and temperament: A short historical survey. Dover Publications.
5.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6.
BharuchaJ. J. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist framework. Music Perception, 5(1), 1–30.
7.
BigandE.PoulinB.TillmannB.MadurellF.D’AdamoD. A. (2003). Sensory versus cognitive components in harmonic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 159–171.
8.
BoltzM. G. (1998). Tempo discrimination of musical patterns: Effects due to pitch and rhythmic structure. Perception & Psychophysics, 60(8), 1357–1373.
9.
BoltzM. G. (2011). Illusory tempo changes due to musical characteristics. Music Perception, 28(4), 367–386.
10.
BorupH. (2008). Is that in tune, Mr. Mozart?American String Teacher, 58(2), 32–35.
11.
BrownS.JordaniaJ. (2013). Universals in the world’s musics. Psychology of Music, 41(2), 229–248.
12.
BurnsE. M. (1999). Intervals, scales, and tuning. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 215–264). Academic Press.
13.
CarteretteE. C.KendallR. A. (1999). Comparative music perception and cognition. In DeutschD. (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 725–791). Academic Press.
14.
CartwrightJ. H. E.GonzalezD. L.PiroO.StanzialiD. (2002). Aesthetics, dynamics, and musical scales: A golden connection. Journal of New Music Research, 31(1), 51–58.
15.
CuddyL. L.DobbinsP. A. (1988). Octave discrimination: Temporal and contextual effects. Canadian Acoustics/Acoustique Canadienne, 16(3), 3–13.
16.
DobbinsP. A.CuddyL. L. (1982). Octave discrimination: An experimental confirmation of the “stretched” subjective octave. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72(2), 411–415.
17.
DonahueT. (2005). A guide to musical temperament. Scarecrow Press.
18.
DurfeeD. S.ColtonJ. S. (2015). The physics of musical scales: Theory and experiment. American Journal of Physics, 83(10), 835–842.
19.
GiordanoN. (2015). Explaining the Railsback stretch in terms of the inharmonicity of piano tones and sensory dissonance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), 2359–2366.
20.
HallD. E.HessJ. T. (1984). Perception of musical interval tuning. Music Perception, 2(2), 166–195.
21.
HartmannW. M. (1993). On the origin of the enlarged melodic octave. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(6), 3400–3409.
22.
HellegouarchY. (2002). A mathematical interpretation of expressive intonation. In BruterC. P. (Ed.), Mathematics and Art (pp. 141–148). Springer.
23.
HubbardT. L. (1993). Auditory representational momentum: Musical schemata and modularity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(3), 201–204.
24.
HubbardT. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 822–851.
25.
HubbardT. L. (2017). Momentum in music: Musical succession as physical motion. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 27(1), 14–30.
26.
HubbardT. L. (2018). Influences on representational momentum. In HubbardT. L. (Ed.), Spatial biases in perception and cognition (pp. 121–138). Cambridge University Press.
27.
HubbardT. L.CourtneyJ. R. (2002, November). Does the cognitive representation of melodic interval correspond to an interval scale? [Paper presentation]. First Annual Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Action Meeting, Kansas City, MO, United States.
28.
HubbardT. L.DatteriD. L. (2001). Recognizing the component tones of a major chord. American Journal of Psychology, 114(4), 569–589.
29.
HubbardT. L.RuppelS. E. (2013). A Fröhlich effect and representational gravity in memory for auditory pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1153–1164.
30.
HuronD. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press.
31.
IsacoffS. (2003). Temperament: How music became a battleground for the great minds of Western civilization. Vintage Books/Random House.
32.
JaatinenJ.PätynenJ.AlhoK. (2019). Octave stretching phenomenon with complex tones of orchestral instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(5), 3203–3214.
33.
JohnstonH. M.JonesM. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 2–17.
34.
JordanD. S.ShepardR. N. (1987). Tonal schemas: Evidence obtained by probing distorted musical scales. Perception & Psychophysics, 41(6), 489–504.
35.
JuleszJ. (1971). Foundations of cyclopean perception. University of Chicago Press.
36.
KarrickB. (1998). An examination of the intonation tendencies of wind instrumentalists based on their performance of selected harmonic musical intervals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 112–127.
37.
KennedyM.KennedyJ.Rutherford-JohnsonT. (2013). Oxford dictionary of music. Oxford University Press.
38.
LarsonS. (2012). Musical forces: Motion, metaphor, and meaning in music. Indiana University Press.
39.
LehneM.KoelschS. (2015). Tension-resolution patterns as a key element of aesthetic experience: Psychological principles and underlying brain mechanisms. In HustonJ. P.NadalM.MoraF.AgnatiL. F.Cela-CondeC. J. (Eds.), Art, aesthetics and the brain (pp. 285–302). Oxford University Press.
40.
LoosenF. (1994). Tuning of diatonic scales by violinists, pianists, and nonmusicians. Perception & Psychophysics, 56(2), 221–226.
41.
LoosenF. (1995). The effect of musical experience on the conception of accurate tuning. Music Perception, 12(3), 291–306.
42.
MakeigS.BolzanoG. (1982). Octave tuning—Two modes of perception [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on the Acoustics and Psychoacoustics of Music, Lawrence, KS, United States. https://sccn.ucsd.edu/~scott/pdf/octaves1982.pdf
43.
McDermottJ. H.OxenhamA. J. (2008). Music perception, pitch, and the auditory system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(4), 452–463.
44.
McKinneyM. F.DelgutteB. (1999). A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave enlargement effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), 2679–2692.
45.
MeyerL. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. University of Chicago Press.
46.
OhgushiK. (1983). The origin of tonality and a possible explanation of the octave enlargement phenomenon. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(5), 1694–1700.
47.
ParncuttR.HairG. (2018). A psychocultural theory of musical interval: Bye bye Pythagoras. Music Perception, 35(4), 475–501.
48.
PistonW. (1987). Harmony (5th ed.). W. W. Norton.
49.
PrattJ.SpalekT. M.BradshawF. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(3), 730–746.
50.
RakowskiA. (1990). Intonation variants of musical intervals in isolation and in musical contexts. Psychology of Music, 18(1), 60–72.
51.
RosnerB. S. (1999). Stretching and compression in the perception of musical intervals. Music Perception, 17(1), 101–113.
52.
SavageP. E.BrownS.SakaiE.CurrieT. E. (2015). Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(29), 8987–8992.
53.
ShepardR. N. (1982). Geometrical approximations to the structure of musical pitch. Psychological Review, 89(4), 305–333.
54.
StevensS. S.VolkmannJ. (1940). The relation of pitch to frequency: A revised scale. American Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 329–353.
55.
SundbergJ. (2011). Some observations on operatic singer’s intonation. Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology, 10, 47–60.
56.
SundbergJ.LaF. M. B.HimonidesE. (2013). Intonation and expressivity: A single case study of classical Western singing. Journal of Voice, 27, 391.e1–391.e8.
57.
SundbergJ.LindqvistJ. (1973). Musical octaves and pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(4), 922–929.
58.
SundbergJ.PrameE.IwarssonJ. (1995). Replicability and accuracy of pitch patterns in professional singers. STL-QPST, 36, 51–62.
59.
TerhardtE. (1971). Pitch shifts of harmonics, an explanation of the octave enlargement phenomenon. In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Acoustics Budapest, Akademiai Kiado (Vol. 3, pp. 621–624).
60.
TerhardtE. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(5), 1061–1069.
61.
TrullaL. L.Di StefanoN.GiulianiA. (2018). Computational approach to musical consonance and dissonance. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00381
62.
VurmaA.RossJ. (2006). Production and perception of musical intervals. Music Perception, 23(4), 331–344.
63.
WardW. D. (1954). Subjective musical pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 369–380.
64.
WeardenJ. H.NortonR.MartinS.Montford-BebbO. (2007). Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 716–729.
