In an interview study with 17 music-creating artists (composers of contemporary “classical” music, electronic music, musicals, movie scores, and jazz musicians) from Southern Germany, three types of music-creating artists could be discerned: the avant-gardists, the neo-romantics, and the self-disclosing artists. These types represent social groups that are prone to typical intergroup conflicts.
The different types of music-creating artists adhere to different aesthetic ideals: the avant-gardists emphasize the abstract beauty of musical structures and try to develop their music from within the music itself, the neo-romantics view music as the true language of the heart and try to express something through their music, and the self-disclosing artists feel the drive to express their feelings and sensations by means of music. As a consequence, different dimensions of musical communication are pivotal: formal aspects, the relationship between the musician and the listener, and self-disclosure. The three types of music-creating artists resemble the types of composers analyzed by Julius Bahle in the 1930s (e.g. Bahle, 1930).
Regarding their modus operandi, the musicians differ on a continuum between a purely rational creative work and the creation of music in an unconscious outburst of inspiration. Nevertheless, most musicians experience an alternation between phases of intuitive inspiration and phases of deliberate rational construction during the creative process. Therefore, a typology of musicians based on their modus operandi seems unhelpful.
BahleJ. (1930). Zur Psychologie des musikalischen Gestaltens.Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
2.
BahleJ. (1936). Der musikalische Schaffensprozess: Psychologie der schöpferischen Erlebnis- und Antriebsformen.Leipzig: Hirzel.
3.
BahleJ. (1938). Arbeitstypus und Inspirationstypus im Schaffen der Komponisten. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 142, 313–22.
4.
BennettS. (1976). The process of music creation. Journal of research in music education, 24, 3–13.
5.
BerlinerP.F. (1994). Thinking in Jazz: The infinite art of improvisation.University of Chicago Press.
6.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
7.
BühlerK. (1923). Über den Begriff der sprachlichen Darstellung. Psychologische Forschung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Grenzwissenschaften, 3, 282–94.
8.
CohenA.J. (2005). Music cognition: Defining constraints on musical communication. In MiellD.E.MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD.J. (eds). Musical Communication, (pp. 61–84). Oxford University Press.
9.
GergenK. (1994). Toward transformation in social knowledge (2nd ed). London: Sage.
10.
GrafM. (1947). From Beethoven to Shostakovich: The psychology of the composing process. NewYork: Philosophical Library.
11.
GroebenN.WahlD.SchleeJ.ScheeleB. (1988). Das Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien.Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
12.
GroebenN.ScheeleB. (2001). Dialogue-Hermeneutic Method and the “Research Program Subjective Theories”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2(1). Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00groebenscheele-e.htm [Date of Access: May 14, 2008].
13.
HanslickE. (1854). Vom Musikalisch-Schönem.Leipzig: Rudolf Weigel.
14.
HargreavesD.J.MacDonaldR.A.R.MiellD.E. (2002). What are musical identities, and why are they important? In MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD. J.MiellD.E. (eds), Musical identities (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
15.
HauseggerF. V. (1903). Aus dem Jenseits des Künstlers. In Gedanken eines Schauenden (pp. 363–424). München: Verlagsanstalt Brückmann.
16.
HoltzP. (2002). Subjektive Theorien Musik schaffender Künstler. Unpublished diploma thesis: University of Erlangen.
17.
HoltzP. (2005a). Was ist Musik? Subjektive Theorien Musik schaffender Künstler.Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
18.
HoltzP. (2005b). Textband zu der Dissertation: Was ist Musik? Subjektive Theorien Musik schaffender Künstler. Unpublished appendix to Holtz, 2005a: University of Erlangen.
19.
JonesM. R.HolleranS. (1992). Cognitive bases of musical communication: An overview. In: JonesM. R.HolleranS. (eds). Cognitive bases of musical communication.Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
20.
JuslinP.N. (2005). From mimesis to catharsis: Expression, perception, and induction of emotion in music. In MiellD. E.MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD.J. (eds). Musical communication (pp. 85–115). Oxford University Press.
21.
JuslinP.N.LaukkaP. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotion: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. Journal of New Music Research, 33(3), 216–37.
22.
KellyG.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. I, II). New York: Norton.
23.
KozbeltA. (2008). Gombrich, Galenson, and Beyond: Integrating case study and typological frameworks in the study of creative individuals. Empirical Studies of the Art, 26(1), 51–68.
24.
LindströmE.JuslinP.N.BresinR.WilliamsonA. (2003). “Expressivity comes from within your soul”: A questionnaire study of music students' perspectives on expressivity. Research Studies in Music Education, 20, 23–47.
25.
MacDonaldR.A.R.MiellD.E. (2002). Music for individuals with special needs: A catalyst for developments in identity, communication, and musical ability. In MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD. J.MiellD.E. (eds), Musical identities (pp. 163–78). Oxford University Press.
26.
MacDonaldR.A.R.WilsonG.B. (2005). Musical identities of professional jazz musicians: A focus group investigation. Psychology of Music, 33(4), 395–419.
27.
MacDonaldR.A.R.WilsonG.B. (2006). Constructions of jazz: How jazz musicians present their collaborative musical practice. Musicae Scientiae, 10(1), 59–85.
MiellD.E.MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD.J. (2005). How do people communicate using music? In MiellD.E.MacDonaldR.A.R.HargreavesD.J. (eds) Musical communication (pp. 1–25). Oxford University Press.
30.
MinassianC.GrayfordC.SlobodaJ.A. (2003). Optimal experience in musical performance: A survey of young musicians. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Education, Music, and Psychology Research, London.
31.
MonsonI. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction.University of Chicago Press.
32.
MoscoviciS. (1961). La psychoanalyse son image et son public.Paris: Presses Universitaire de France.
33.
Müller-FreienfelsR. (1912). Die Psychologie der Kunst.Leipzig & Berlin: Teubner Verlag.
34.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987). Discourse and social psychology.London: Sage.
35.
ReitmanW.R. (1965). Cognition and thought.Wiley: New York.
36.
SabaneevL. (1928). The psychology of the musico-creative process. Psyche, 9, 37–54.
37.
SawyerK. (1992). Improvisational creativity: An analysis of Jazz performance. Creativity Research Journal, 5(3), 253–63.
38.
von ThunSchulz F. (1981). Miteinander reden: Störungen und Klärungen.Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Verlag.
39.
SlobodaJ. (1985). The musical mind: The cognitive psychology of music.London: Clarendon Press.
40.
StravinskyI.CraftR. (1962). Expositions and developments.London: Faber & Faber.
41.
TedeschiJ.T.SchlenkerB.R.BonomaT.V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?American Psychologist, 26, 685–95.
42.
Van LangenhoveL.HarréR. (1994). Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal fort he Theory of Social Behaviour, 24(4), 359–72.
43.
WagnerW.HayesN. (2005). Everyday discourse and common sense — The theory of social representation.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
WahlK.HonigM.-S.GravenhorstL. (1982). Wissenschaftlichkeit und Interessen: Zur Herstellung subjektivitätsorientierter Sozialforschung.Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
45.
WatzlawickP.BeavinJ.JacksonD. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study on interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes.W. W. Norton: New York.
46.
WetterstenJ. (1999). The critical rationalists' quest for an effective liberal pedagogy. In ZechaG. (ed). Critical rationalism and educational discourse (pp. 93–113). Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi.
